Potential NSFW (Classical painting of nude woman) http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/ar...y-strong-sex-drives-can-men-handle-it/276598/ There is also an interview with the author of the book at the Salon review; that can be found here: http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/the_truth_about_female_desire_its_base_animalistic_and_ravenous/ A couple of the more interesting (to me) questions and answers: Kelly, can you handle this? Michelle, can you handle this? Beyoncé, can you handle this? I don't think they can handle this! I think this is true. If I were a woman, I'd play with my tits and ass all day! Also, regarding rape fantasies, Rapey McCreppypuff would've loved this thread. How has Ted Wolf been these days?
I have no doubt that women naturally hunger for sex just as much as men. The problem is that they've been socially conditioned that they have value only when they're conservative about it. Which is a huge shame for both genders. It's an equal shame when men are stigmatized for not having the stereotypically dominant sex drive.
social conditioning. A. she doesn't want to seem a slut or B. you met her and rejected her because you considered her a slut.
I may have rejected girls in the past for being ugly,fat, obnoxious, mean, smelly, dull, dangerous, high maintenance, etc..., but I can guarantee you that I've never personally rejected a girl because I thought I might get some!
So you fucked each and every ugly,fat, obnoxious, mean, smelly, dull, dangerous, high maintenance, etc woman that offered?
Not that you thought you might - that you thought everyone else had. You might be the exception. But I've known plenty of girls with high sex drives, and they often WERE - in fact - sluts (understand that I do not consider that a bad thing) and the guys divided neatly into those who said "who cares? i'm getting laid" and the ones who didn't want to travel such a well worn path. Girls on the other hand are conditioned, beyond the whole BS of "good girls don't" to believe that a lot of guys might want to have sex with you but none of them will want to marry you if you have that kind of reputation...so even if they do WANT to get laid early and often, they restrain themselves because they have been taught guys don't want that sort of girl for a relationship. Which is often true. Essentially, a contest of mind games based on a series of false or misleading impressions feeding off each other.
Personally, the world would probably be a better place if most peoples sex drives were considerably weaker.
Well, when people stop expecting the public to pay for their birth control and abortions I will agree with that 100%.
I can understand where you're coming from, but from the way I see it, pills are far cheaper to taxpayers than the care of a child for eighteen years (usually more since many perpetuate the cycle rather than get out of it).
Bullshit. Nobody rejects a bed-hopper, unless it's a marriage situation. I don't want a virgin. Let Captain Kirk go "where no man has gone before."
Hardly a surprise, after my last major relationship break up I spent a year cultivating a nice array of fuck buddies - all aware of each other, and we all knew it was companionship and sex, with no promise of it being anything other than that. Great sex, no relationship bullshit getting in the way, just fun, laughter and orgasms. They were eager, and no small amount of experimentation went on, and by and large they came on to me. Tragically I went and fucked things up by falling in love with someone a couple of months back!
Is it so much a matter of taxpayer-funded contraception, or private insurers cherry-picking what medical services to offer based on archaic moral standards?
The result of which would mean that there would certainly be less people in the world, which would be a great thing.