WTF?

:terrorist911:

Do we really need this one?

It belongs here as much as these do -

I don't think so. I can't see any time a laughing terrorist over the WTC buildings would be needed.

I can't see any time that laughing at Nazism, homosexuality or the persecution of blacks would be needed....



....but it happens.


Too many of the circle jerkers here has double standards. If people want to be able to make racist and homophobic remarks, why is 9/11 out of bounds?

I'm with Chup on this. There's no good reason to disallow this while keeping the others.





I suppose I'm technically also with Clyde.

and are useful.

We have too many fucking smilies.

Well, they don't get used on the board, but I'm sure they're used in PMs, and without irony.

You guys have racist smilies you like, so you have to put up with ones you don't like. Seems fair.

When do you see me using them?

Point them out.

Otherwise don't be a shit and lump everyone in the same "you".

"You guys" suggests Lanzman was speaking generally.

You would think so but he wasn't.

The :terrorist911: emoticon isn't anything special, no reason to treat it otherwise.

OMG! That looks like the prophet Muhammed.

Lanz is gonna die!

Oh no, a jihad against Wordforge. :omg:

Muhammed looked like a round shit coloured basketball?

No wonder he had issues.

Bring it.

But, this thread seems to have run its course, so