Zee 2021 Random Meme Thread

Isn't this you?



Maybe try shutting the fuck up.

The sad thing is, he probably believes they're real.

Hey, there's nothing wrong with sexualizing women in ridiculous ways to give men erections. It's only when women sexualize themselves in an empowering fashion that it's disgusting and icky and bad for the children.

Yes, yes, we know female sexual agency is scary.

That isn't "female sexual agency," it's crudity for its own sake with a heaping helping of "sex sells."

Yet you’ve never said anything to T.R. for his choice of avatars.

oh no doubt but the military has some name for it and it would be backwards like "Bag, Sleeping, One Each" or "Assembly, Strap, One Each".

Nor have I said anything to you about yours. Your point?

How is this a problem in this world? I know it is a problem for prudish child Ben Shapiro as it triggers him, but I am not really sure why. For thgat matter I am not sure why the right freaks out over the Mr. not being on a potato head doll.

You seem to have all your priorities mixed up, and despite decades of the right wing being prudish cancel culture I still see them giving their children to priests to molest. which I would actually consider a problem with the world. How has being a bunch of cancel culture prudes made things any better for the world? I know it has perverted society and caused sexual dysfunction and severe mental problems with rape culture and men being able to control themselves around women, but how did it ever improve the world?

Should we donate to TR's safe space so he does not melt like the snowflake he is?

Yea ... that finger ... Goddess only knows how your head might explode if I took a pic of one of my toes.

Is it your favorite finger?

Have you spent hours compiling a top ten list of your favorite fingers, and picked the one you're most proud of to show the world in all your photographs?

Consistency has never been a hallmark of the far left. I'm sure someone will be along shortly to leftsplain this......

Whatever you say chief. Personally I think two nasties grinding on television is a far worse impression for children than a 60 year old cartoon or toy, but to each his own.

It's a pic of a finger. Are fingers now offensive? or just your (general you) arbitrary societal definition of what is or isn't offensive?

Don't answer. I already know.

So, why deem one thing offensive and not another?

Because it's all so fucking arbitrary.

I don't give a fuck if anyone thinks my finger is offensive.

I don't give a fuck if anyone thinks T.R.'s avatar is offensive.

I don't give a fuck if anyone thinks a pic of two women ... dancing(?) is offensive.

But, don't be arbitrary. Be consistent or no one will take you seriously.

What the hell does two cartoons of children's stories have to do with "the left"?

Die in a fire.

I would like to note that we are back to worrying about cartoons which is a huge improvement from our previous administration.

You are going to make @T.R cry with that sexualization of a chicken. It triggers his meltdowns like a wet cat.

Given that the “OK” gesture now apparently means “white power,” yeah, I guess fingers are offensive. Especially one that is almost universally understood to mean “fuck you.”

So, why take offense to a pic of two women dancing (?) but not a pic of my finger?

Here's something I've always found difficult to understand: the medium of communication is, in some cases, supposed to completely eradicate the communication itself.

I've seen it so many times, over the years, with variations: "It's just pixels on a screen" or "It's just words".

But does that actually make any sense? Spoken words are actually just vibrations of air particles. Written words are just ink on paper. So if I call someone a particularly vile racist term, should that not make any difference to him or her, because the medium of communication is just vibrations of air or ink on paper?

This approach seems to negate the whole principle of communication. The medium is not, itself, the communication. The communication is the idea that is transmitted. If I give a "middle finger salute" to someone I meet on the street, I am communicating an idea; the finger is simply the medium by which it is communicated.

To claim otherwise seems highly disingenuous to me. It actually seems more like it is making an argument in bad faith, trying to communicate something offensive, and then pretending the other person didn't have the right to be offended because the medium of communication is not, in itself, offensive.