So it is ok for trump to send his son and son in law to talk to the Russians about disrupting our elections, and to ask them directly to do it in a tweet, but Hillary is evil for perhaps doing it? It is ok for trump to grab women by the pussy and force kiss them because they won't object because he is the Donald, but also Franken needs to be stopped according to him? We do need to stop all of these things, and perhaps we should start by locking up our POTUS who seems to do a bunch of bad things. I am pretty sure we can accomplish getting rid of them all, but since trump has saved us the time by confessing repeatedly we should just get rid of him first so we can move onto more complicated issues. Oh and could someone please keep women away from old Bush. Until we get some of these guys who have multiple complaints and admissions of guilt perhaps we should focus on the big problems instead of all Franken who has women coming out to defend him including his one potential victim. Impeach the molester in chief and toss him in a hole with some men who will grab his pussy.
In addition to pretending to grab tits, it seems Franken's not averse to actually groping butts. How long before a pussy-related allegation comes along, completing the trifecta of inappropriately touched womanly body parts?
Repulsive though he is, President Donald Trump has done nothing while he has been in office to justify impeachment. You start throwing an elected official out of office for things they did before taking office and you'll be opening up an entirely new mess in the future.
I'm wondering how long till someone makes some kind of claim regarding John McCain? He used to date strippers and IIRC he attended the wild Naval Aviators (Tailhook) Conventions. Anyone believe he probably grabbed some tits and/or along the way.?
He has potentially obstructed justice which is a crime. Of course he would have to go through the impeachment process and be guilty, but he has done actions that could lead to that. Claiming he has not is just willfully blindness, but you are quite good at that.
Yes, but it doesn't mean it did not happen. Under your logic no one kills anyone until convicted in court. Murder victims are still dead.
You clearly said he has done nothing to justify impeachment proceedings. Are you trying to claim he has never done anything resembling obstruction of justice which would justify impeachment proceedings?
I've seen nothing that resembles obstruction of justice on the part of President Trump. If you are referring to the firing of James Comey, he served at the pleasure of the president and the president was fully entitled to dismiss him at will. That isn't just my opinion but the opinion of Alan Dershowitz who knows quite a bit about the law.
So you are willfully blind and ignorant. Good for you. Not all of us are, nor is Alan the one making such decisions. However, multiple members of congress have called for impeachment and articles of impeachment have been filed, and congress is the ones who do impeachment, not some law hack you pulled out of your ass. At least quote the law hacks in congress.
Alan Dershowitz is widely considered one of the best legal minds in the United States today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Dershowitz And multiple members of Congress also called for President George W. Bush to be impeached as well. It didn't mean anything. Not to mention that the Republicans would never agree to it in sufficient numbers.
Yes, he is often considered wise by the dolts who rely on him to spoon feed them their opinions. Since you have no mind of your own to make an argument with why are you speaking when you should be listening to those who do?
Are you implying you've made up your mind on your own? I don't see that. And I've been repeatedly advised here at wordforge that I should listen to the opinion of professionals who are experts in their fields. By any measure in this case that would be Dershowitz. Though IIRC the equally well regarded Lawrence Tribe has a similar opinion.
Yes, but you ignore the fact lawyers are trained to argue both sides of a story and to defend guilty people because everyone is supposed to get the best defense available. Lawyers support the opinion of the people they are paid to represent. So whoever is paying Alan is the one who has told him the point he makes, not the actual truth. Yes, you are a gullible fool who relies on others to spoon feed you your opinion.
You didn't know I suppose that Dershowitz is a long time political liberal and no friend to Republicans or conservatives. Logically then he would not be skewing his legal opinions in favor of a Republican president.