UA responsibility tangent from political meme thread

Sadly not, or the fuckers would be dead.

It's meth.

Knock Knock!

Uncle Albert: "Get the fuck off my property!"

You're supposed to say "Who's there?"

"I'll tell you who's gonna be here, the cops, if you don't get the fuck off my porch."

Oh great. Just what I need. Finding angry bodies next time I walk in the woods

I almost started a thread about this, but I had a funny feeling I'd already done so years ago.

How do you know if an Uncle Albert is bullshitting?

His lips are moving.

How do you know if an Uncle Albert disagrees with you?

Don't worry, he'll let you know.

What do you get when you cross an Uncle Albert with a reasonable person?

An explosion similar to what happens when you combine matter with antimatter.

Someone dragged a tooth the other night. I am looking at you @Jenee .

Do you find a lot of happy bodies in the woods?

If a tree fell in the woods, and no one was around except for Uncle Albert, would he still insist that he's not responsible for making it fall?

I would have gone for:

If @Jenee chokes on @Uncle Albert 's dick in the woods and no one is around to hear it does anyone care?

You left out the Jeep again.
Maybe have it sitting in the corner watching?
Little tears coming out of the headlights?
Work on it.

People complain I always mention his brokedick jeep, and then you complain when I just imply it is there because it is the fucking woods and only I would be crazy enough to drive a fucking sedan or car with a sports suspension into the forest to get a car blowjob from some chubby internet slut in private. BTW I am not being sexist because I love my chubby internet sluts with and without nuts.

Is nothing ever good enough!

Fat fingers @Spaceturkey , I think it’s funny.

I'm gonna agree with all of this.
While also noting that a private platform such as Wordforge is still entitled to restrict whatever it likes.
I'm not clear if that still applies to Facebook and Twitter given their status, so there's a trade-off there.
Certainly deciding that some forms of speech should be banned in law because they can lead to incitement of violence is a no-no.

There's a distinction to be made here between freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Some appear to be in favour of the former only. It's actually what applies in some European countries, including Ireland. Freedom of speech is a more expansive concept. It's what's in the US constitution and I think it's one ideal worth realising.

Don’t worry, DHS will be along shortly to tell the owners of Wordforge what counts as disinformation and then they will recommend who to ban.

ahem:

your right to build a fire does not include burning shit to the ground, no matter what your dunning-kreuger dementia says.

How narrow does the wiggle room get?

Is "will no-one rid me of this turbulent priest?" acceptable whilst "whack this priest's bitch ass" isn't?

You’d be singing a different tune if it were Trump doing this, but somehow I knew it would get a pass from Echo ChamberForge.

hmm... if Trump had acted against misinformation and incitement (that is what we're talking about here, right? right.) rather than embracing and encouraging it, why would I complain?

think about this shit before ya speak, a'ight?

“Misinformation.” The Democrats’ big lie.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” Joseph Goebbels.

so you're claiming that misinformation doesn't exist by citing goebels?

.... dude ...

No. No I am not claiming that at all.

ISWYD

Where is that federal farmer's greatest hits thread? That is some dayton level mindrot there.

I thought elon was the great white billionaire job creator republican libertarian wet dream? why is he laying off people? shouldn't he need them to work?

Maybe if we give him some more tax breaks he will make more jobs? I have been told tax breaks make rich people create jobs spontaneously and surely we can fix this by giving him more tax breaks.

Republican/libertarians are so fuckingt stupid and gullible they believe in trump and elon.

I mean, as we learned thanks to Dayton, impersonating a Federal official is a big no-no.