UA responsibility tangent from political meme thread

That's the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard. I hope someone rapes you to death for being so stupid, then kills your whole family for allowing you to be born in the first place. They'd be doing the world a favour, and I'm sure the cops would give them a medal instead of pressing charges. I might even send them $50 for their heroism.

Well! Since UA's back on clinicians, here's a guy with a PHD after his name who's written a book called "Laziness Does Not Exist".
I'm sure he'll gleefully accept its conclusions with a song in his heart.

Do you ever listen to yourself? Shut the fuck up asshole.

I hereby combat you with good speech.
Hey. Don't do that.
Hugs instead.

Someone's actions causing harm does not necessarily mean that said actions are wrong.

You implied that my position is "hurt feelings is harm, therefore I get to curb free speech if it harms me." That is not a position I hold, and I presented more extreme examples illustrating that I do not necessarily believe that no one should be harmed. Yes, hurting someone's feelings is harm, but limiting free speech is a greater harm.

Yes, people exist who believe that hurt feelings are more important than free speech. Those people are wrong.

I also created a fictional version of you who is a stabbing and sodomy enthusiast because it amused me to do so.

How many Uncles Albert does it take to change a light bulb?

Oh no, it's not my responsibility to go around changing light bulbs. Sure is dark in here. Goddamn welfare queens need to get off their asses and do their job so I don't have to sit here in the dark.

Obviously.

You could have made that a MUCH shorter journey, for fuck's sake.

See, that's free speech. Good job, sport!

Congratulations on finding the stupidest fucking thing I've heard in a long time.

So you're back off clinicians?
Or do you just cherry pick them?

Oh nice you updated your signature.

If it's obvious, why did you accuse me of believing otherwise?

I could have. You could have as well. Let's just call this one a tie and move on.

I wouldn't exactly call your "social psychologist professor" a clinician, but if you insist on it, then not all clinicians are equal, and the bottom of the heap would be idle academic bullshitters who are probably also socialists.

No, that is not a blanket dismissal of all acadamia, so don't fucking start with me.

who the fuck used google? let alone a self diagnosis?

are you fucking schizophrenic? (much like depression, that's long proven to be a bio chemical imbalance)

But I get it, you're adverse to any info that doesn't fit your misperceptions and so project delusions onto others.


Seriously dude, get help.

which one are you talking to?

And, you just went full Federal Farmer.

Pretty sure "noted" clinical psychiatrist Jordan Peterson isn't a fan of socialism.

Quite big on the whole manly man, rugged individual image though.

The one actually using hate speech and calling for violence.

You chimed in on exactly THAT conversation. If you want an irrelevant fucking tangent, state it up front.

Most people who invoke their "condition" when trying to avoid accountability for their choices, silence differing opinions, or both.

I don't know. Let's ask Google!

gotcha, you don't recognize medical conditions-including your own paranoid delusions.
da fuq are you on about with google?

well, I'm seeing one who's saying that it's okay to heap abuse on whomever he pleases and accepts no responsibility for the hatred he encourages and another ridiculing him with an absurdist reflection of the results.

I think you’re reading into what he’s saying. And, because you’re intentionally being intellectually dishonest, he’s continuing to say exactly what he has been saying just so he can watch your head explode. the other one is explicitly encouraging violence.

Who decides?

Who decides what?

Which is which?

I do. I am never to be questioned. Merely obeyed.

Well …, if you read my post, I said “I think …”, so .., I guess, I decide.

For yourself or everyone?