Just to clear things up...

I read it all. Lanzman made a remark, Sokar asked him about it, Lanzman didn't respond...probably because he is wise, and he doesn't want to troll up threads like you do.

Sokar asked him about it again, Lanzman AGAIN didn't take bait, AGAIN because he's not a troll like you....and here we are.

You read this thread, period. You're completely oblivious to a pattern of posting, and now you're going to spend the whole afternoon OCDing on this until Sokar comes around and tells *me* to STFU.

Or not. Of course, you could solve this VERY quickly by pointing out what I missed in the course of the conversation between Lanzman and Sokar.

You're right, I could.

Sigh.

I will gladly admit that I was wrong about it too.

It's really not that big a deal. Tell you what...just watch how Sokar and Lanz - or Sokar and anybody - interact in the future.

Actually, it IS a big deal. So come on, post the conversation history so I know what I missed.

You weren't trolling again, were you?

Ah, so now you're narrowing the parameters to make it impossible to answer.

If you were actually interested in an answer, you'd realize that Lanzman didn't make this post in a vacuum.

You might also have noticed the little border of skulls at the bottom of all of Sokar's posts and wondered what they meant.

Then you might remember reading some of Sokar's posts OUTSIDE OF THIS ONE THREAD.

From all of that, you might be able to reach a conclusion.

But I think you're more interested in playing General Chang again. Maybe 14thDoctor will be willing to go a few more rounds with you. I'll pass.

Tamar, pretty please???????

Sorry - didn't get further down until after this posted

Thank you

Two posts.

That IS the conversation.

Whilst sucking upon your teets, Lanzman remarked about a poster 'that gloats in his sig about people he has run off'.

I was waiting for an opportunity to point this shrill little fella to the discussion a few weeks ago where the facts behind my sig were detailed. However, I wanted to allow him plenty of space to further jam his foot down his mouth.

He knows what was said there. That's why he scampered away when I called him on his incorrect statement.

For someone who claims to be a writer, I find your lack of reading comprehension... disturbing...

^See, Azure. This is what I'm talking about.

Sokar is The Authority.

Anyone who criticizes him is a flying monkey.

OK, this is spooky..... I was just looking at those skulls and wondering what they meant JUST before I decided to catch up on this thread. Am I reading your mind?


mm

I can feel the sexual tension in this thread.

Great minds *do* think alike. Of course now you realize that to be consistent Sokar will have to call you a flying monkey?

He's risked enough in slamming Lanzman. May as well go for the whole suicide run.

Or else Tamar will intervene and explain how it's Not the Same Thing.

This thread just got interesting again.

ok tamar garamet havign affair.

...You watching the same soap I am?

Si with fan parody actually sorta like fanparody subs of anime

Goddamn right.

Now RESPECT MY FUCKING AUTHORIT-AAH!













(P.S. - Please stop taking yourself so seriously. None of us do. K? Thanks.)

Sokar also speaks for All of Wordforge!!!11!!

A flying monkey, like in TWoO? Minions of the Wicked Witch?


mm

Why the hell would I call her a flying monkey? I like MM.

You? Not so much.

Risked? Suicide?


Haven't we talked to you about missing your meds before?

Exactly.

Mewa, give him a

I have to say: some good did come out of this shitstorm - I was able to repair a few database artifacts caused by a software bug. For instance, our 3 April Fools moderators were still listed in the moderator table until last night, though without any authority. That has been corrected, so that they can be banned or deleted.

How can a thread entitled 'Just to clear things up...' make things so much more complicated?

You ruined my plan of a takeover of wordforge.

You don't post here often enough.

Wordforge has one outstanding talent. I call it "preemptive labeling." It's really just a slightly - emphasis on the word "slightly" - more sophisticated version of "I know you are, but what am I?"

In other words, someone will take their own behaviors and claim that *you're* the one doing it, not them.

Thus, I have been labeled the WWotW because *they* troll me, and I'm supposed to just remain the passive victim. Anyone who refuses to troll me is labeled one of my "flying monkeys."

In fact, IIRC, that's Sokar's true claim to fame. I do believe he was the first one to stick the label on people who are perceived to be "on garamet's side."

That's the short version of it, anyway.

Now watch the reaction.

You really aren't 'passive', even by a very generous redefinition of the word.

Passive-aggressive, perhaps.

Huh.

No spelling or punctuation errors.

One very common capitalization error.

Oh shit, I think he was serious.

It's complicated. I'd explain, but I'd need to use charts and stuff. Possibly a dry-erase board.

Here ya go.

http://www.wordforge.net/showpost.php?p=1518371

I thought I would save you some time rather than watch you try for hours to get a straight answer from people who live and die by their righteous preconceived
opinions.