Is the future bright for Russian space?

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Midnight Funeral, Feb 3, 2010.

  1. Midnight Funeral

    Midnight Funeral Cúchulainn

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    8,622
    Location:
    Portadown, North Armagh
    Ratings:
    +1,693
    Very soon they will become the only remaining nation on earth with a mature, tried-and-true, humans-to-space capability.

    Thanks to Obama's jackassery, this will be the case for maybe 10 years or more.

    What does this mean for the Russian space industry? Is it on the verge of boom times?
  2. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,338
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,816
    Have the Chinese secretly shot everyone involved with their space program and you're the only Westerner to know about it?

    The Russian program is only able to function because of the money the rest of the world is pouring into it (since that's less worrisome than having a bunch of unemployed rocket scientists). Unlike NASA (for now) and China, the Russians can't afford to send people up into space unless they're going to the ISS.
  3. Midnight Funeral

    Midnight Funeral Cúchulainn

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    8,622
    Location:
    Portadown, North Armagh
    Ratings:
    +1,693
    That's why I said mature and tried-and-true.

    The Chinese space program is still pretty much a startup. They've had one or two manned launches for a few spins around the earth and then down again. Yuri Gagarin type stuff.

    The Russian manned launch systems have been used hundreds of times over four decades. Their reliability is second to none. If you climb into a soyuz capsule in Baikonur you can be pretty sure you're going to get into space and that you're going to come down again in one piece. They're the Toyota Hilux of manned launch vehicles.

    And finally the Chinese aren't renting out their space program to the west AFAIK. Nor are they partners in the ISS.
  4. Forbin

    Forbin Do you feel fluffy, punk?

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    43,616
    Location:
    All in your head
    Ratings:
    +30,537
    I suspect they'll be using it for political leverage eventually.
    "You vant your crew to come home from the station? Here's vat ve vant you to do..."
  5. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    I didn't know a donkey, a cart, and some old Soviet-era punch card computers could be described in such glowing terms.
  6. Muad Dib

    Muad Dib Probably a Dual Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    53,665
    Ratings:
    +23,779
    At least the Russians are still using their donkey, cart, and punch cards.
  7. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    How very green of them.
  8. Captain J

    Captain J 16" Gunner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    11,019
    Location:
    Taking a dump
    Ratings:
    +5,144
    While Obama has fucked this up, it's not in the way you are thinking. At this point in time all LEO other than military should be turned over to commercial enterprise. He is doing that.

    Where he has fucked the chicken in the ass is by killing the programs designed to get us to the moon and mars. That is what NASA should be doing, not taxi service to LEO.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Doctor Manhattan

    Doctor Manhattan Fresh Meat

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,052
    Location:
    Upstate New York
    Ratings:
    +433
    Yes.

    A somewhat pessimistic acquaintance once told me that after the great disaster, the Cadillac owners would bow before the horse owner.

    It would seem that America has become the Cadillac owner.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Lt. Mewa

    Lt. Mewa Rockefeller Center

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    50,129
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +9,404

    D'UR!!!! :ramen:
  11. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,141
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,709
    Those programs were already dead, best case scenario was an Apollo style landing happening at the earliest by 2028.
  12. Captain J

    Captain J 16" Gunner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    11,019
    Location:
    Taking a dump
    Ratings:
    +5,144
    The Constellation project was the backbone of both. No reason to kill the bird with over 5 years development and billions in it already. All that money is now gone and useless.
  13. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    I heard a few years ago that the Russians were going to take the space tourism thing one step further.

    They already offer orbital flights to people with 20 million dollars to pay.

    I heard they were going to modify the Soyuz capsules to sustain three cosmonauts for flights around the moon (no landing), which is what the Soyuz was originally designed for anyway, and sell one of the seats to anyone who wants to put up 120 million dollars.
  14. Forbin

    Forbin Do you feel fluffy, punk?

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    43,616
    Location:
    All in your head
    Ratings:
    +30,537
    A familiar condition to those of us following the F-22, the A-12, the F-20 (private funds there)...
  15. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    Or Zumwalt class destroyers.
  16. Captain J

    Captain J 16" Gunner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    11,019
    Location:
    Taking a dump
    Ratings:
    +5,144
    The Barry plan. Although the A-12 was ridiculous from the get go IMO.
  17. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,141
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,709
    Sunk cost fallacy. That money is spent and gone now either way, so you base decisions based on what the cost and time needed from this point on is.

    I'm no rocket scientist, but the Augustine Commission spent a lot of time running all the numbers and came to the conclusion that Constellation was not going to come close to meeting any of its targets, and with the way things were going would never make it to Mars.
  18. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,338
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,816
    The Chinese have done more in space than Yuri did. While the Chinese have had fewer launches at this point in their program, compared to where the US and the Soviets were at the same number of years after they sent the first astronaut up, the Chinese have done more in each launch than either the US or the USSR did for the comparable launch. The Chinese also don't have to figure shit out from scratch like the US or the USSR did. You can bet that the Chinese have scraped ever last piece of data from NASA's servers that they possibly can. And unlike the US or Russia, the Chinese are aiming for the Moon.
    I know they've done the space walk already, and I think they've done the docking as well. One other thing:
    Anyone who dismisses the Chinese does so at their peril.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Muad Dib

    Muad Dib Probably a Dual Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    53,665
    Ratings:
    +23,779
    Looks like we're gonna wind up sleeping under the light of a Communist Moon after all.
  20. Captain J

    Captain J 16" Gunner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    11,019
    Location:
    Taking a dump
    Ratings:
    +5,144
    With Barry as Pres we might be doing that even if we landed on the moon. :bergman:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  21. Starguard

    Starguard Fresh Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,402
    Location:
    Midwest
    Ratings:
    +766
    This reminds me of an old war story I head once, about these WWII era fighter pilots that were just entering Korea and the cold war

    I dont know if you all understood that analogy, and for those that dont, Obama and the Govt have to start looking towards our Future, and he's not going to get us there by living in the past

    We've already been to the moon. We were the FIRST ones there.. remember?

    Our Space Shuttles are all as old as dirt, they are falling apart, and are no longer reliable.


    We need NEW GOALS, along with NEW TECHNOLOGY to reach them if we are to stay ahead of the rest of the world.

    If I remember correctly, I believe Obama's scientist all have their sights on building manned missions to Mars pretty soon!
  22. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,338
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,816
    Yes, we do, unfortunately, we haven't been given any.

    You don't remember correctly. Bolden's said he'd be upset if we don't go to Mars within his lifetime, but the path Obama's put us on, even in the most optimistic scenario does not lead to Mars. It does not automatically rule that out, but it by no means makes it even remotely assured, and given the way NASA tends to get fucked over by Congress, makes it more likely that the entire agency will get flushed down the crapper in a few years.
  23. Starguard

    Starguard Fresh Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,402
    Location:
    Midwest
    Ratings:
    +766
    I believe Obama killed the moon mission so he could use the money to build better spacecraft and technology for deep space exploration. Instead of focusing on going back to the moon where we've already been (several times), He wants us to focus more on unchartered territories. I can't find the article I read this in, but when I do I'll post it here!

  24. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,141
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,709
    Actually in the most optimistic scenario it leads to Mars faster, although I don't expect to see that happen.

    The idealistic outcome of this situation is that private industry starts worrying about all the headaches of how to get into and operate in LEO, and NASA's heavy lift development will enable them to put together vehicles that can explore beyond LEO.
  25. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,338
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,816
    Not true. It leads to a rocket which could deliver a manned mission to Mars or a Near Earth Asteroid being started on a year or so sooner, but it does not have any kind of final destination in mind. Its as if we built a Saturn V, but didn't bother with a lunar lander or Skylab. We can do either, and it won't necessarily take us a long time once we make up our minds, but it in no way says that we're gonna do anything more than build a big ass rocket.