Trump encourages Putin to continue hacking the US.

The Clintons frequently funneled their contributions through third parties so they drew less scrutiny. That's now drawing some attention, and just yesterday the IRS launched an investigation into the Clinton Foundation's finances. What they were doing is having some large corporation, foreign government, or millionaire with business before the State Department to donate to an otherwise innocent looking charity, and then that charity would turn around and either pay Bill a huge speaking fee for an appearance or make a large cash donation to the Clinton Foundation. Other times the Clintons would just funnel the payoffs through a shell corporation and not report it.

I have no doubt that the Clintons are corrupt, and that things like that happened. It doesn't change that post #28 is a lie and that your two-step routine to evade that is all too familiar.

Why are you even engaging him?

He's just trying to shift the conversation away from his anointed lord and savior Donald "Judas" Trump.

Would that be the same Donald that utterly destroyed Hillary in front of her press lackies yesterday? Donald didn't hack her e-mails. He didn't help Putin hack her e-mails. Hillary did that all by herself by refusing to use systems protected by the NSA, and then moving the jewels of the kingdom onto those servers, a crime for which she and her staff should face the electric chair like the Rosenbergs. Hillary and her lackies should spend the rest of their lives in jail or be put to death for what they did. She sold us out for her own personal gain. She needs to die. Bush and Cheney didn't make a dime off the Iraq War, but the Clintons were using it as an opportunity to enrich themselves, and they enriched themselves in the aftermath, and then they dialed enriching themselves to eleven. The Middle East is burning and hundreds of thousands of people are dead so Hillary can make more illegal money of the worst rulers and corporate oligarchs on the face of the planet, and the left is cheering it on.

The only people on the left with any morals or standards at all are the Bernie supporters who want to see Hillary rot in federal prison. The rest are for unlimited greed, corruption, and power to be given to the all-powerful, unaccountable ruling class who can't be held to answer by plebes. Mentally, you are not fit to live in the United States because you belong in a third world hellhole under the thumb of whatever corrupt caudillo controls your police and military to keep you and your family scrounging for a living in a trash dump. You look down on Filipinos and Guatemalans, but you are worse than them because you should know better than support our very own Imelda Marcos.

So now you want to execute political opponents?

No, I just want them to get the death penalty they deserve for thousands of felony offenses that resulted in the death of countless US government officials for hundreds of millions of dollars in personal profits. Her e-mails with Huma mostly have her bitching about which corporate jet to fly as she rakes in more money speaking about the people she let die so she could make more money in her quest for more power to make illegal money.

That's a yes - you want to execute political opponents.

Well yes, when they've racked up enough felonies to give someone a 14,000 year sentence in federal prison as Hillary has. How do you sentence a person to 14,000 years in prison? You can't. There is no punishment that can match her admitted crimes because there are simply too many of them. The entire black community combined can't even compare. Simply rotting in prison isn't sufficient punishment for a level of blatant corruption a thousand times worse than what sends legislators to jail for a decade or more. And that's not even getting to her husband, a serial rapist on par with Bill Cosby.

Yet she is apparently the most moral and electable candidate in the entire Democrat party, which says a lot.

Actually, he said that he hopes they find the deleted emails, which is a bit ambiguous. It could mean that they already have them, or that he wants them to go looking for them. And anyone who thinks Trump put a lot of thought into the comments doesn't understand Trump.

Just highlighting the interesting bit.
Take that in for a bit....memorize it for later....
Okay, now your day can continue.

Maybe not yet, but give him time. So far, he's only exposed himself as Putin's boy. What he actually does in that role remains to be seen, but it's up to the rest of us to make sure we don't find out.

Yup.When you publicly or privately encourage a hostile foreign power to interfere in our internal or external practices and policy's, that's treason by any measure.

The Smith Act:

U.S. Code § 2381

Throw him in jail. He can bunk with Bradley Manning.

I've been asking that question ever since the gtard bot showed up here.

I don't think he's committing treason or a traitor or anything ridiculous like that, but that's arguably the least presidential/diplomatic thing I've ever heard a candidate say. I mean it's pretty embarrassing.

Thus his adulation for Der Drumpfenführer.

So . . . Hillary breaks national security laws by having/using a private email server to conduct official business, but that's fine. Trump points out that Russia took advantage of this arrangement and that's where you find a problem?

I have literally never said anything of the sort and in fact I am on the record here repeatedly saying Hillary is a corrupt, untrustworthy elitist. Go ahead and search it.

Thanks for proving that you're the simple minded, binary fucking American I always knew you were tho.

Even if he's being sarcastic, which I think he probably is - or just stupid - that's an embarrassing, amateur hour comment to make considering what Putin and Russia have been doing over the past few years. I would expect better from my leaders. I get the feeling you set a pretty low bar in life though.

Looks like we know who you're voting for though, Mr Independent.

No, you apparently don't.

Well I'm convinced.

Let's assume any of that has basis in truth (which if you're posting it, we can easily dismiss for the low rent fan fiction your posts usually are ):

Do two wrongs make a right?

No, but three rights make a left.

It's not another wrong. When America's security agencies found out about Hillary's secret e-mail server, they needed to know what classified documents it had stored so they could evaluate which US intelligence programs and assets had been compromised. But what did Hillary do? She wiped the servers to try and destroy all the evidence, evidence that was needed for United States national security. That was another felony, by the way. If Russia can provide us with the evidence she tried to destroy, it would be a good thing if we got to see it.

Except for the part about that not being against the law at the time when she did it.

It was against the law when she did it, as was destruction of evidence, evidence tampering, and perjury, all of which she committed willfully and knowingly. The only reason she's not rotting in prison is that the Administration is completely corrupt.

You see, after Bill left office, he and Hillary turned public service into a lucrative cash for favors scheme that grossed them over $2 Billion dollars. Obama won't dare shut that down because if he does, then he and Michelle won't be able to parlay his stint in the White House into a $3 to $10 Billion dollar personal fortune.

It was sarcasm. Ya ya that's the ticket. And he is going to change his running mate to Morgan Fairchild.

Once again, list those felonies, the actual charges, and the sentences please.