No, ur actually not, you sociopath. Trampling human rights based on shoddy policy which is itself based on shaky pseudoscience is not the opposite of "crackpot paranoia", it's the opposite of conscientious policy. So which one are u promoting? Conscientious policy or trampling human rights?
And that's how science works. But when you start crafting legislative policy on that, and then using legislative policy as the onus for refusing to debate it or test it or examine it further or acknowledge where the preliminary theories have failed and require revision, that's where it stops being science and starts being religion. And that is exactly what has happened.
Precisely. Whenever someone wants to stop gathering more data, they're standing against science, and probably know that they're standing against truth. (source) That's the difference between lies and the scientific consensus. The consensus never says, 'we know this, so let's stop research'. It will always say, 'we think this might be true, so let's continue research.'
Oh? The consensus never says "we know this so let's stop research"? Looks to me like that is exactly what the consensus says and has been saying for a while now.
And u dismissed the source without reading the claim let alone evaluating it. Fail indeed, but it's ur fail, not theirs. Closed minded bigot retard.
Just to preserve the joke for anyone who didn't follow Castle's link: It was a list of bing search results that he hoped might substantiate his claim if he chose the right search terms.
I see a lot of mockery, but it's a lot of nothing. Just gas. Just... nothing, and gas, and mockery, and pseudoscience. I'd have got the same thing from trying to debate Creationists. That's what u all are. Creationists. No better.
I believe you. But you should really stop faulting your eyes for that; it's your brain that refuses to see.
Oh wot's next, u going to tell me I would understand all if only I would accept Jesus Gore as my lord and savior? How do u not see the parallels between ur retarded religion and theirs by the way?
You know what else consensus is? In science just as in high school: worthless. Popular opinion. Garbage. Trash. Useless.
Standard Situation #322: Castle has fallen through a time hole and is pretending the last two pages didn't happen, and I lose interest.
Pfff copout And u wonder why people doubt this pseudoscience poop? Because this is how u defend it: lazily. With copouts and evasions and fallacies and anything except actual science. It should not surprise u that so many people disbelieve u.
Anyone who thinks they know more about science than scientists, then mocks scientific theory, has no business discussing science.
"Derrrr herrrr! Give up civilization because its hurting the pwecious pwecious gaia! We don't have anything to back that up with, u should just take our word for it and live like primitives while the rest of the world lives like it's the 21st century, don't ask y because u dont need to know, just do as we say herrrr herrrr durrrr!" NO. How's that? NO. This isn't science, it's just another grab for control and money, and the answer is NO.
Okay, let's do science without it. Let's have every crackpot come out of the woodwork and say "I discovered a thing! ", and then without tests, or trials, cram it right onto store shelves, and force doctors to use it, and then we can watch the corpses pile up. But hey, at least they can look down from Quackery Heaven, and know they cacked it in the name of some incoherently framed notion of "liberty". I'm sure we won't end up in "Idiocracy", at all. Because reasons.
And anyone who thinks that science is unquestionable doesn't know the difference between science and religion.
Anyone who doesn't know the difference between scientific method and "oh, I gotta have my car!!!" has no business discussing science.
That's "anthropogenic" climate change in a nutshell. Every prediction based on it has fallen flat on its face. Every single prediction based on it has *falsified* it. Every time you apply the actual scientific method to it, it gets *falsified.* Which is why all you have left to defend it with is religion-like *dogma* and religion-like *shunning* for those who question the dogma. And u, who pretends to be smart enough to not fall for religious BS, u fall for *this* religious BS. And u don't even notice it, let alone laugh at it. U *fail* at being u.
I'm not this 'John Castle' ur on about, and I haven't seen any 'John Castle' in here. I'd notice if some emaciated speed freak was in here, and there isnt one. Unless it's u. If u know how to spot one, presumable it's coz u are one.
A copout is a copout, no matter how you try to stylize it. And that was a copout. Now can u argue the point or not?
You know what's weird, when a poster comes back as a dual and everyone knows who it is, the dual always acts stupid. Or is it just Castle every time he comes back?
Am I to understand that u hate NOT being stolen from and bossed around by unelected shitheads? I mean, if u want to be bullied and shat on, that's fine, but why can't u get that for urself and leave the rest of us free of it who arent into that? Why do u have to cheer for the rest of us being fuckt with?
Oh, look at all the emoticons with no substantive arguments to support them. Cowards. Spineless, mewling cowards.