http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/13/muellers-team-interviewed-priebus-on-friday-243765 Pribus is squeeling on Donnie Small Hands. This is why you don't fire your senior staff and instead always show loyalty to them. If you want loyalty back then you have to show it.
They’ve interviewed Spicer too. Seems it took most of a day. Even if we assume Spicer and Priebus are doing their best to shield Trump (which is far from certain), getting them on record now could lay the foundation for charges of perjury or lying to investigators later on. http://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/17/sean-spicer-mueller-russia-probe-243882
That's pretty funny I guess, Mueller questioned a guy that was hired by a man who claimed to be a Trump guy but who's now dead, and, hint hint, probably killed himself because of the Ruskies? Oh, what, not claimed he was a Trump guy, but implied it? That's the latest layer of collusion the country's great investigative minds have uncovered and revealed through leaks? More thousands of taxpayer dollars spent as down payments toward what still sounds so far like a bad joke. [Hope to god they find some cum on the shorts or whatever it is at the end of this rainbow.]
And news is starting to break that Obama covered up Russian bribery during his administration. Obama again covered for the Clinton's. Perhaps we should get a new special counsel to investigate this.
Trump's big problem is going to be if he is ever put under oath. Trump lies so often and so casually that it would be almost impossible for him to do a lengthy deposition without committing perjury.
When and if we do, go ahead and start your own thread about it. Since it’s not a part of this investigation all it can be here is a distraction, which is if course exactly what you intended.
Actually, very likely a distraction will be all we are given at the end of Mueller's 'rainbow.' Unless of course it turns out there was actually some actionable collusion between Trump campaign and Russia, but so far that still seems about as remote as the odds of growing the next generation of liberals with belief in responsibility and accountability for all.
Given that they’ve already admitted to attempting to collude with the Russian government, that shouldn’t be too hard. Then of course there are the numerous financial crimes potentially committed by Flynn, Manafort, Kushner, or even Trump himself. And don’t forget the big O.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.nati...oof-trump-campaign-attempted-collusion-russia Even the National Review has admitted that Trump sure tried hard to collude. From the evidence we know tge Russians did exactly what they were asked to do as well.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...d-russian-propaganda-days-before-the-election Just about everyone in the Trump campaign was in lock step trying to prompt Kremlin fake news stories during the election. Gee, it was almost like collusion.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/10/18/donald-trump-gop-tax-reform-mcconnell-215723 Congressional Republicans just want to pass the tax cuts, the kick back they have promised to all their lobbyist donors, then it will likely be open season on Trump. The sad fact is their giant tax give away will explode the national debt but ever hypocrites they won't say a peep. They only pretend to care when a Democrat is in office.
That's revolting ! particularly when a quintessential nutjob liberal sees no irony in suddenly raising concerns about the national debt today, but couldn't be troubled about it yesterday.
From your article: As I recall, the folks at Enron one day just up and said, "Yeah, we're really worth nothing" and the whole thing just imploded, wrecking the lives of a lot people not directly connected with the company. I've no idea what Mueller's doing with the investigation, and I am curious about the broad tentacles it is spreading. Does that mean there's a lot of dirt? Or is he pulling a Ken Starr and just going after anything and everything which he thinks might lead to some kind of conviction for people in the Administration? I don't know.
Kent Starr, Rob Mueller, Pat Fitzgerald: overpaid hatchet men giving out costly sinecures to cronies, while they grind out any axes accumulated over a lifetime in government. All these fuckers ever crave is a chance to be in spotlight again, thirst for power if not more money, it's a pity government-paid lawyers can never seem to behave without the burden of their baggage and biases, even while pretending they're "independent." Next time politics demands another 'special investigator' to run a third porkfest for lawyers (with both houses of Congress already borrowing more money from China to run parallel investigations on related topics), I hope they only pick someone who, if asked, would refuse the job. *That's* the kind of person we really need.
The Hill is not a right wing rag. Also that was an opinion piece, probably a paid opinion piece, so it is no doubt from an interested party.
There is absolutely nothing in Mueller's past to suggest he is a hachet man as Tuttle claimed. That is just a smear Trumpanzees invented to try to excuse Donald's criminality.
Fake news, all debunked. Hillary not involved in the decision, uranium that was sold is not the grade they make bombs out of.
Tony Podesta, brother of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman and pizza aficionado John Podesta, is reportedly under investigation for possible violations of the Foreign Agent Registration Act. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...ting-democratic-lobbyist-tony-podesta-n812776 So Mueller is investigating a Democrat. That seems like an odd thing for a biased, conflicted, politically-motivated hatchet man to do.
