Banned from the TrekBBS again

Exactly. You blamed it on the doctor. Try rereading my post.

I didn't say anything about Dayton abusing his family.

Dayton comes here and blusters, tells people to fight him in real life. In his actual, every day meat space life, he gets fired for behaviors that indicate he has trouble with people telling him what to do. Here, it's a safety valve. He can be lambasted day and night and feel special from all the attention. I think Wordforge is a crutch for him, that he needs it for validation. It's not about what power Wordforge itself has, but what power Dayton gives it, which is considerable if his posts are any indication.

Try writing coherently. The doctor who (probably) infected my right foot was a surgeon who was cutting off callused material. He had nothing to do with me being a diabetic one way or the other. He didn't even specialize in diabetes treatment.

The initial damage to both feet was due to me trying to prepare for the upcoming football season (for a coaching job I didn't get anyway) by walking three miles a day during the hottest part of the summer to condition myself to the heat.

I checked both feet carefully for damage after each time I went walking. I did not realize that your feet can suffer damage that isn't apparent until later.

I think it was around 2001 when I first started posting over there. I used to really like the board until Christian starting bragging about using ad money to fund his Playstation or PS2 or whatever it was. Plus, I had such a boring job as a programmer for an insurance company that I entertained myself by trolling people. And once I finally got kicked off, I came back as several different people and tried out various personas. Great fun back in the day, but 17 years later? Nah. It got old real fast, especially after I got married and had kids. Kinda puts things in perspective when your kiddo asks you why you're laughing while typing furiously on the computer.

Where did you study medicine doctor? Probably same place as ed369.

Take care of your feet, hands, teeth, and eyes. Those suffer the worst with diabetes.

No kidding.

That is on page one of diabetic care.

You just said you didn't realize that your feet can suffer damage that isn't apparent until later. That, too, is page one of diabetic care. Diabetes and circulation go hand in hand. The smaller the blood vessels, the more likely diabetes will damage them beyond repair. Don't walk around barefoot. I *hate* shoes, but I always wear diabetic socks because they facilitate proper circulation, while keeping your feet dry. If you don't wear them, buy some. You can get them cheaper through a place like Amazon, but even Walmart should carry them.

Honestly, Dayton, your diabetes most likely did play a factor. A normal healthy person most likely would not have had a run away infection or wounds which were extremely slow in healing. Those are both extremely common problems in extremities for folks with diabetes though.

In short, in exact same conditions with the same exposures a non-diabetic most likely wouldn't have had a problem but as you do have diabetes you did have a problem.

Oh, it's "probably" now.

According to Dayton, if he'd have never gone to the doctor, he'd have never contracted the MRSA or whatever in the open sore that he'd let fester for months before he finally saw the doctor.

Gotta keep fact straights

This is what you get when a train wreck meets a dumpster fire that has jumped the shark.

That's what I was wearing when my feet blistered. And once again the circulation in my feet are fine. If it means anything I've having that specifically rechecked on Wednesday.

That is what my surgeon (who did all three operations on my right foot) said.

Good. You annoy the shit out of me. A lot. A whole lot. Still, I don't want anything bad to happen to you.

You can go to Tumblr and post things like "fiction isn't reality" and "Lance and Keith will never be canon" and you'll be entertained for days.

But trolling TBBS? Yeah, that's just too much work for too little payoff. All the people I personally took issue with have long since fucked off and I'm the old Fandom Mom of ENT forum regaling stories about Morpheous, the $corp/Storm Rucker cancellation troll, the over the top reaction to This Ain't the Valentine ande Great Ship War of 2004-05 which is 75 percent of the reason I stayed here after Stewey who I followed here left.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

From what I've read, there were no witnesses. How convenient. Plus, she's a hate Trumper. So I'm not buying it.

I must confess, the Dems have concocted a brilliant plan. It's a pity they don't govern as well as they plot.

Innocent until proven guilty. With some, it's guilty unless proven to be Democrat.

I wonder if its time American society simply dispenses with the idea of sexual assaults being treated differently than other crimes.

A Supreme Court nomination hearing is not a court of law.

Yeah, it’s a job interview. Worst case scenario, he goes back to his lifetime appointment on a lower court. The accuser is the one with everything to lose. This constant victim complex gets tiring.

Did you figure that out all by yourself? You still have the presumption of innocence, it's a basic guaranteed right regardless of whether you're in court or not.

If this nomination doesn't go through, Trump should just nominate one of the women on the short list.

Go back and read the constitution and see exactly what that amendment says, then come back and and try talking with the adults again.

No shit sherlock. You still have the presumption of innonence until proven otherwise. Not the presumption of guilt. That's not how it works.

I've heard Amy Barrett is next on the list for a Trump Supreme Court appointment.

Wonder what they will accuse her of? Making homemade porn while in high school?

How it works where? Can you cite a source that says that the presumption of innocence exists outside of a court of law?

So you're perfectly fine with Kavanaugh losing the nomination based solely on accusations alone?

Did I say that? I don't think so.

Can you provide a citation indicating that the presumption of innocence exists outside of a court of law or not?