The California Exodus

Keys to UA's personality: He's a ginger (I can say that because someone - probably Tamar-to-whom-the-rules-did-not-apply - posted a photo of him once).

Gingers have our backs up from the get-go because the minute we step outdoors we're attached by (A) direct sunlight and (B) Cartman types.

UA, unlike many of us who have had to swim against the tide and appreciate others who have done so, took the "I GOT MINE AND FUCK THE REST OF YOU" libertopian attitude.

That what he "got" was just a service industry job with no possibility of advancement, as opposed to his libertarian idols (inherited money, nepotism, etc.) only made him angrier. Not at the idols, but at the rest of us who refuse to see the world from his narrow end of the telescope.

UA = chronically angry. /discussion

Indoctrinated and rationalized !="grew up," princess.

Correct.

It's greedy to want to keep more of what you worked for, but not greedy to take what other people worked for. That's considered rational in some corners of the 'verse.

Don't even try to educate them about household income growth the past few years vs the entire preceding decade (those past few years that just happened to coincide with lower taxes and fewer job competitors).

What's correct is =/=. You'll be using it frequently. Practice.

Right there you prove you don't know a goddamn thing about me.

No, I take the "I earned mine and insist my claim to what is mine takes precedence over those who did not earn what is mine." attitude.

Do not presume to know my idols, or that I even have idols, bullshitter.

Another presumption that is not yours to claim.

I know what you post. Unless your posts are all lies, I know you.

Harping on a pedantic point while skirting the substance. Quintessentially you.

You "know" what you filter through your semantical bullshitter beer goggles. You keep trying to attribute your "creative" interpretations to people as though that carries any weight whatsoever.

I would prefer people made better choices, but what I do not view as a valid alternative to that is depriving them of that choice. If we have to resort to that to engineer a prescribed outcome, we don't deserve to exist.

@ the idea of garamet knowing UA.

If I as your neighbour want to burn toxic waste in my backyard after bringing it down the highway on my horse drawn cart it's my damn right.

Right. Nobody will ever make the right choice unless it is forced upon them. The best way to cultivate a better human race is to condition each generation to submit reflexively to that force, and of course, that force would never be abused.

Yeah, doing those things should be my right even if it's better I don't.

I know what you post.

Choice and consequence. Your companions even if your ideology strains to disavow them.

Then here is where you supply verbatim quotes proving exactly what you claim about me, without relying on any sort of interpretation on your part.

https://wordforge.net/index.php?members/uncle-albert.63/

Now, do the Donnie-boy Dance. "I never said that! Why would you say that? Why do you ask such mean questions?"

That's what I thought. You've got nothing, and you articulate it with all the dignity of a 14 year old on twitter.

So you're claiming you never posted all of that? You're an entirely different person? Suspect, given that despite your "Fuck me running" exodus all those years ago, you post exactly the way the original Uncle Albert did. You'll be just as easy pickings as he was.

I'm claiming nothing. You have made the accusation, and now it is your job to prove it.

From your imaginary fuck dolls? Dear god I hope so.

And you will demonstrate that any minute now....

Afraid to reread your own posts? Not surprising.

This is where I do your homework for you. Because I serve at your whims.

Instead, I will adopt your own tactics. I know me, I know my posts and I know I have supplied nothing in support of your bullshit accusations.

No, this is where you either (A) reread your old posts and think "Gee, I was an asshole then; I'm sooo much more mature now; or you say (B) "Fuck you, I'm the same person, I haven't changed my opinions one iota since I ran away and, did I mention, fuck you?"

Or refuse to do your own homework because (B).

No, your highness. You made an accusation, and you get to prove it. I know I'm an asshole, but that doesn't absolve you of the responsibility to support your own assertions. It should be easy on a message board with a search function.

So you're unable to read the link I posted? That's beyond sad.

The link you posted was to my user profile. You're saying "read your 50k posts and prove what I'm saying is not true". You're adopting the Fox News tactic of "I'm just asking questions. Why won't he respond to my questions?"

No. You want me to accuse me of something, you will demonstrate your direct knowledge of that thing with unambiguous evidence, or admit you pulled it out of your ass.

So you feel 50K posts are not insufficient to prove a pattern of behavior? Well, then, just keep posting the way you are right now and in no time at all you can add another 50K more to your profile.

I feel that a half dozen posts would be enough to demonstrate that, if you would bother to supply them. But you won't, because they don't exist, and you goddamn well know it.

So because you're either too lazy or too incompetent to use keywords on your own posts, having demanded I do your homework for you, you are now projecting your accusation on me.

Keep going. I want to see how long you can sustain this before you find something useful to do.

BTW, have you and @Jenee decided to take shifts? Haven't seen her around since you went into Rabid Dog mode.