The 2024 Omnibus Political Memes Thread

I do not know if I should be doing this, but I will try an explanation for the boy.

It is like when the preacher brings you back for the special prayer session between you and him where he prays with what is between your legs and his legs until what is between his legs gets put in your butt or your mouth until it spits out that creamy goodness. Only this would be between two grown men, and neither of them is a christian preacher, and both of them want to do this. There is probably not a lot of prayer involved, but there may be some shouting to god.

It is so sad when kids like you need to learn this shit online because your mom drank herself to death. Don't you have a foster parent or something that should be telling you this stuff? Can't you ask the kids at school or something?

I think the boy has a more basic question of sexuality. Remember he is in one of those states where the stork brings the baby is sex education.

Assuming this is a good-faith question, determining the sexual orientation of historical figures can involve some guesswork, and is complicated further by changing social norms such as changes in whether a particular action is viewed as romantic or sexual in nature ... but in James I's case, there is a lot of evidence for him having been gay. Every piece of evidence can be interpreted different ways, and any one piece by itself might not seem conclusive, but the sheer volume of evidence for James I makes it pretty fucking likely:

1) As a youth, he displayed little to no interest in women.

2) It wasn't until several years after they were married that he and Anne had their first child; contemporary verses were circulated saying that he was "a bougerer, one that left his wife all night intactam."

3) There were numerous contemporary references alleging his homosexuality. A French poet wrote "It is well known that the King of England / Fucks the Duke of Buckingham," and that's just one of many sources.

4) While showing little interest in women, he had numerous close relationships with men and would often hug and kiss them in front of others. These included the Duek of Lennox, the Earl of Desmond, the Earl of Somerset, and the Duke of Buckingham. In a letter to one of his favorites, James complained about him "withdrawing yourself from lying in my chamber, notwithstanding my many hundred times earnest soliciting you to the contrary," and there was a secret passage linking his bedchamber at Apethorpe Palace to the Duke of Buckingham's.

Any one item by itself would be far from conclusive, but the entire body of evidence taken together says that James I was gay as fuck.

Merely existing asks nothing of anyone else.

How fortunate for you.

For all of us.

Only if you’re completely isolated.

You must be defining "ask" very broadly.

Nah. How do you get your food? Your water? Your clothing? Your shelter? Your education? Your employment?

Public school, and voluntary transactions.

It what way does that compare to a tiny bit of the population expecting validation, affirmation and special treatment at all times? That's not voluntary. I haven't volunteered.

Those all involve someone asking someone for something.

You didn't volunteer to go to public school, either. If I call you a racist prick, did you volunteer for that? How is my calling you a racist prick any different than you saying that trans people are fucked in the head?

It is very much the same, in that both are harmless free speech.

And voluntary transactions are not asking, imposing or coercing anyone.

Ex-Presidents can't incite riots, and Twitter can't get Heather Heyer killed, but trans-positive storybooks can turn cis kids trans, and non-whitewashed history books can make white kids hate themselves.


Jesus, can you imagine UA as a dungeon-master? All the conflicting rules he'd shit out?
It'd be like Calvinball.

All you fucking DO is imagine, you tedious waste of adipose tissue.

Your harmless free speech does nothing.
But I get the sense you were hoping otherwise.

The biggest evidence there is no christian god is the fact that Trump and his people have not been flooded, killed by brimstone, or plague of sky toads.

Covid whittled them pretty good.
It just didn't have the drama of Bible plagues.
Well, it would if our news was as un-sanitized as India or Mexico.

Covid did not come anywhere near wiping out all the life on the planet except for one ship with 2 of every creature. Also, could you imagine what some fire and brimstone could do to the tinderbox of california and australia?

Covid was lame as fuck and had to be exacerbated by MAGA crazy. We need better plagues. How the fuck am I to know my buttsex was good if it doesn't summon a hurricane and wuip out Miami? There are gay dudes every day sucking dick in Ft Lauderdale and we have not had a good hurricane here since I was thirty. That is twenty fucking years.

Harmless to whom? For example, if you were to be fired from your job because I called up your employer and said that you were a racist prick who made them look bad, would you say that you hadn't been harmed by that? And, yeah, people do get fired for things like that.

Can't help but notice that you missed the part about going to school not being voluntary. I will also point out that voluntary transactions involve people asking someone to engage in a transaction. It might be something like, "What would you like to order?" or it could be, "Is this for sale?"

Slander is a very specific concept that does NOT reduce to "all free speech that hurts my feelings."

I've repeated tons of fucking times that the problem with bringing gender politics into public schools is that it's a captive audience.

And there doesn't have to be any overt request for a voluntary transaction. Not sure what point you think that makes.

And all I'm doing is starring at your boobs.