Reactionary Radical Eliminationists vs. Trans

Yes, it would.

So, now that we have that out of the way...

Tell me more about that pro wrestler that inspired The Fugitive.

I’m out and about now and posting from my phone so linking to a wiki article is going to be easier for you. But if you wait an hour or two, I’ll be back home.

https://www.thesportster.com/wrestl...quitted of the,he innovated The Mandible Claw.

Thank you, that was fascinating.

Don’t even try. You don’t even answer, let alone had someone call you a liar. You’re called a liar when you post contradictory statements, then refuse to comment when asked.

Liar.

by liar you mean she is spouting the truth?

@Jenee is obviously a performance artist hack, but she is right.

Too bad Tamar isn’t still around. I don’t feel like searching for all the posts I’ve asked you for clarification on something and you refused to answer.

HEH-and the shitbrained non sequitors you spew come from a higher source of some sort?

sweetheart, nobody can misrepresent what you say here because it's so fucking oversimplified in the first place. factor in how the moment someone tries to explore the notion in any depth, you turn into an insult machine.

like Crosis says-as an intellectual sparring partner you're basically an inflatable bozo bag.

Hey, the old "libertarian = anarchist" chestnut. Haven't heard that one in awhile.

Still waiting on the inaccuracy.

"Explore the notion in depth."

It's getting sad, the way you think your bullshit bingo is fooling anyone.

Hey, UA is right!
We all hate Spaceturkey now!
Yaayyyy UA!!! Yaaayyy!! Fucking yaaaayyy!!


Speaking of fucking delusions...

This is weird.

Are you saying that when you constantly insult and criticize another poster you are trying to get other posters to also hate that poster?

What are you 8?

Still denying reality, I see.

Dude is WAAAAAAY down the rabbit hold even since I muted him.

WOW.

You can't blame UA for being brainwashed.
I mean, sure, Ben Shapiro was a joke for his rivalry with Cardi B, but he got this guy who puts on a Scottish wrestling persona to shill for him, and now suddenly he makes all kinds of sense.
I mean, who among us could resist that, huh?
It's KGB levels of diabolical, really.

(A chortle slips through )

And a reserve supply in case of emergency. Like some sort of prepper.

Scary buzzwords without actual objective meaning, like "woke" or many others going back to "politically correct"

What they mean by it, or any of them really, is "things which challenge the status quo (which in this case is default to bigotry and bullying) make me scared and so I must fight against them"

And somehow they think calling something an ideology is a slur. But any belief you're willing to campaign for is an ideology. "Be kind to trans people" is no more, OR LESS, an ideology than "Beware the evil groomers trying to trans your kids!"

Oh I'm down the rabbit hole?

Maybe if I go get my hog lopped off it will bring me back to reality.

yes... you are.
and no, probably not. That'd require taking responsibility and possibly even a bit of sacrifice which you've long shown yourself to be incapable of.

Responsibility for the hurt feelings of soft people who think they have a right to never be offended.


What does that responsibility look like, mein fuhrer? Social credit scores? Reeducation camps?

oh, look... self godwinned

why is it always on others?
maybe you don't have the right to go out of your way to be offensive? see here's the thing, our actions have effects and consequences for others.

I mean, sure... being a slightly larger than average white man you have the privilege of being able to do that. But that jsut takes us into "man or bear?" territory...

I absolutely do have the right to say offensive things. That's kind of the point of specifying a right to free speech. There's no need to protect something that would never be challenged. This may be one source of confusion for you.

Actually. The point of specifying a right to free speech was a citizen should have the right to criticize a decision made by the government without being put in prison.

I’m certain the Founding Fathers would have considered the ability to freely say offensive things as childish.

That is true. Considering that in the Founding Father's time it was common to respond to an insult by ritualistically shooting at one another, I imagine many "free speech" advocates don't actually understand what they're asking for.

We all have the right to say offensive things, but we do not have the ability or right to avoid the consequences of the things we say. I have said some offensive things around here, like to @Jenee , and she does not like me along with other people. Lots of people do not respect me or what I say. If I go post some porn, dox someone, or post racist imagery it is my choice, and I might get warned or banned over it as a consequence.

As a schoolteacher you have to respect and not be abusive to the children in your care. That means respecting their chosen gender identity or sexual orientation. The same might go for other government workers or employees of corporations. If you cannot do that then you do not have a right to work there and will be fired or not hired. They do not have to pay a bigot to represent their business or office.

Most of the time this might not be an issue as a welder may have no interraction that requires respecting another person's gender identity. You seem to have chosen employment in a place where none of this is an issue which is your decision. Looking at your goofy ass I am pretty sure your appearance has had it's own consequences on your life. You could look more "professional" and maybe go different (note I said different and not better) places in the world had you chosen to not look like a guy who rapes kids in a shack in the woods.

I'm certain it's fucking irrelevant how anyone perceives it. Being offended is NOT sufficient to infringe on anyone's freedom.