Anna seems to think preventing people from talking about what John did makes people forget hat John

This bitch fit is very entertaining, though.

No, I think it was clear you should stop pretending to be a caring human being in the red room or anywhere else.

I say we get some scrap lumber and find out.

Few would believe him, anyway. He could start posting about feeding the hungry, encouraging the poor in spirit, and most of us would wonder what angle he was trolling from. If anyone took him seriously, he would push them away from Christianity.

Hey, some of us do actually feed the hungry and homeless on a regular basis and I am not even a Christian. Leftforge still finds time to criticize while doing nothing to help themselves. Such is life.

Unless they're Muslim, and then they're animals, right?

no DUIs or drinking offenses on my record

Congrats on getting your case suspended while you go through the diversion program. I honestly do wish you luck. I think the bike is a great idea.

They don't have a religious test there. I would indeed ban any and all Muslim immigration if given the chance as no muslims equals no Islamic terrorism and more muslims undoubtedly means more likelihood of Islamic terrorism.

It is simply good policy especially as no one has a right to immigrate.

I have never had anything diverted nor any cases suspended but thank you for your concern.

Are you saying that you wouldn't feed the hungry, or help the homeless find shelter if they were Muslim?

What part of they have no religious test/qualifications where I do my volunteer work did you not understand? I said I would not allow Muslim immigration which is a very different thing.

We weren't talking about Muslim immigration, we were talking about feeding the hungry, and finding shelter for the homeless. We have those in the U.S., too.

I'm going to let him split hairs on this one

With that said, @Dinner, may I submit this article for your consideration? (yes, I note it's from 2012) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/20/fbi-informant

I was speaking about first what the charities policy was then my position which always has been about immigration. Maybe I should have been clearer but I have said it dozens of times so I figured people of average intelligence would understand that.

So you didn't answer the question, which was neither about your charity's policy on feeding the hungry nor about your policy on immigration, but about your policy on feeding the hungry.

And that is the problem. Trying to sort out the real terrorists from the big talkers from the normal people. It is virtually an impossible task thus why the FBI felt desperate enough to try almost anything.

That is why I would just skip that whole process and say no to any Muslim immigration thus heading it off before it can get established and make matters worse. There is no law that says q have to let everyone in who wants in. Sure, that means we are still stuck with the current crop of muslims here but at least we are no longer making things worse domesticly by adding more potential terrorists.

I thought this was pretty clear:

No, I would not cut off any citizens from charity. Most of the money for homeless services including feedings comes from government. I would without question require proof of legal status and require arrest and deportation of people not here legally who are seeking to suck at the tax payer's tit. Resources are stretched past breaking without adding in illegals of all types.

A big part of why every shelter in the city has a two month waiting list is because there are so many illegals of all types. Eliminate them and actual citizens who need services can get it more easily. At St Vincent's 80% plus of their budget comes from government sources so the change needs to come at the government level.

Yes, and it seems to me that Paladin said he was going to take a break from here for a while, and it had something to do with that thread.

How'd that work out for him?

You sure are a special kind of stupid, aren't you?

Stupid like a fox.

Warning for revealing personal info of @Volpone. Comments to MA.

Whelp, cowardly @Ancalagon closed it, so there you go.

Yep, all they did is confirm all the negative things about them which we already knew.

Why close it? It's pretty easy to ignore. Closing the thread just makes it look like you guys know you fucked up and banned someone because he hurt your feelings or you didn't like him or something.

Weak.

Because Anc is a tiny person with a big ego who is unable to admit he is wrong?

Except for all the other threads that have gotten locked when nothing is added except flaming and trolling.

What hasn't been said in the last 13 weeks that needs to be said?

The Help Desk just isn't the place for Dinner and Captain X cry-spam.

Most threads in the HD that ran their course but had devolved into just bickering and moaning have been locked.