Dayton3/Tracker/Dayton Kitchen’s Greatest Hits

@Dayton3, reporting a post from 2013 is a misuse of the report post function. Penalties can include warnings or loss of the function.

Is that written in the rules somewhere?

Yes, it's under the common sense clause, and as a matter of fact, you are about to lose that function. I already told you to knock it off, and now you've reported something that is ten years old? If you insist on crying wolf, then we will remove that option for you.

Then please give me a hard time frame cut off for using the report function on a post.

I actually hit that last one before reading your warning. I had been searching for it though for some time.

No.

If you lack the common sense to know that two years is well beyond the realm of reason, you probably shouldn't be allowed to report posts.

Why not? Since when is rules clarification an unreasonable request?

Why? Such posts are still viewable by everyone here. Why shouldn't they be treated as any other?

Be honest about why you really don't want that done gul.

Common sense dipshit. Giving a warning for a post that 2 years or older is ridiculous. Because if it was given, then the warning would be retroactive to the time period of the post. Meaning it would be long expired by now, dipshit.

Wait, he reported this one, too?

Let me state for the record that the last BR post you reported, that I just saw five minutes before posting this reply, that I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

This is why you can't have nice things.

Dayton why not answer a simple question in order to better advocate for your position.

Why did you report the post in the first place?

Maybe if you could provide a coherent and compelling reason your argument with the mods would go farther.

No u.

We're not doing Enterprise rules here. We're not punishing posts for thing that happened four owners ago, and neither would any other message board.

You do realise that people can and do change in the space of two years, let alone ten, yes?

Do you deny this?

See third paragraph from the bottom.

http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/immunity-from-attack/

That's an exception, as it states. The circumstance in which it can arise was quoted in the other thread, and you don't seem to care whether that circumstance applies or not.

Nothing outrageous, but I thought this was funny

Word of the day "filthy".

If you study your phonics and work hard, one day you can spell it all on your own.........

Is that what they told you about your analytical analysis ability?

My analytical analysis ability is just fine.

Prove it.

You prove it is lacking.

Something about positive statement.... something about burden of proof up to you.

I wasn't the one to bring it up. Thus the burden is on you.

​

Your Englishy English ability sucks. Hiring you as a teacher is child abuse.

He never was good about the details.

Your Praxis score proves it.

Dude can't even get xenophobia right....