Dayton's Great World

I'm pretty certain, Rick that you've said you would keep the Greatest Hits thread alive no matter what I did or did not post. Mainly because you consider me "dangerous" (your word) for some reason.

So let me understand.

• Dayton’s moo cow daughter slow fucking her boyfriend in missionary position is deviant.
• A married man and wife engaged in S&M bondage, object sodomy, ass to mouth and female degradation is not deviant.

Correct?

No, not "some reason".
I've said that your views are dangerous and repellant and I've told you why, so you are fully aware despite the affectation of ignorance. And obviously if there's no material then I won't be able to post it in the Greatest Hits Thread.

You've rebooted that thread more than once with no new material whatsoever. and in this thread you gave a positive rep to that animal who insults my daughter.

What do you think that makes you?

It's a pretty dangerous situation when people are advocating for control over others' sex lives.

I do have to say though I'm very uncomfortable with insults aimed at your daughter.

I'm hoping you realised that was my point....

I think it makes me someone who considers rep as inconsequential.

And no, I haven't "rebooted the thread with no new material". It never drops below the first couple of pages because you continue to provide more.

I want 7.0 A1c level in my blood.
elective abortions a memory
The Patriots receiving the Lombardi Trophy.
The Cowboys making the playoffs.
The 7th Fleet in the South China Sea.
The Russians in only their country.
A Unified Korea with its capital in Seoul.
Bashir Assad and Kim Jong in hell.
People in church three times a week.
The Dierks Outlaws in War Memorial Stadium in December.
My retirement fund bringing in 7% annual returns.
Plenty of dried, bailed hay in the barns.
Star Trek on network television every year.
Star Trek on the big screen every other Christmas season.
Honor Harrington on the small screen.
sexual deviants in the closet.
Sci Fi Universe, International Combat Arms, Science Digest on the newsstands
Transformers returning to sanity.
Really cool Battletech TROs
B-1B bombers hitting targets on three continents.
Lorraine Bartlett writing some decent Booktown mysteries.
Decent places to buy books and magazines everywhere.
A brand new nuclear powerplant beginning operation every year.
U.S. astronauts on Mars.
U.S. unmanned probes orbiting the outer planets.
Cows grazing in the meadows.
Ships of the U.S. 5th fleet patrolling the Persian Gulf.
A Bush in the White House
NATO in Eastern Europe
new Ford pickup in my driveway
Illegal aliens staying in Mexico
presents under the Christmas Tree
A big fire in the fireplace in January
Liam Neeson in a thriller
Harrison Ford in a space opera
white Christmas only in the movies
Arkansas Razorbacks in a News Years Day Bowl
God in heaven
most businesses closed on Sundays
people staying off their IPhones 90% of the time.
a 9th major planet in the Sol system detected and imaged.
updated
Liberty Hill Church of Christ with 30+ people in attendance every Sunday morning
Harmony Grove, Bissell Chapel, Pleasant Grove & Burg cemeteries well maintained
a nice updated set of World Book Encyclopedias in my living room bookcase
good Star Trek novels six times a year
the Abramsverse & Discovery universes completely forgotten
a good run of Star Trek comic books
same with Transformers comic books
all the issues of Hooten's Arkansas football in my possession.

Two issues here:

1) Why do you care what two consenting adults do? If two people have sex outside of wedlock, how does that affect you personally?

2) What you are essentially saying is that ANYTHING that a married man and woman do together in the bedroom is fair game and is not sexual deviancy. Are you sure you want to stick with that definition?

Liar. Post #3458 where the only thing you posted was "Bump". You are just another wordforge liar Rick. And a cowardly one at that as you won't even admit it.

If what two consenting adults do undermines marriage in general it negatively impacts our society. A society that I and my loved ones have to live in. Thus it is my business.

Post #3458 consists of the word "Bump" along with a quote from you saying "I'm no fan of physical contact with other people".

But thanks for bringing that up - it bears considerable relevance to the topic at hand in this thread.

I'd say that you'd have to provide proof that it does. I rather think that it just undermines your idea of what you think God wants.

They don't have to live in it. They are free to leave any time they want and take up residence in another country that more closely aligns with their values.

How is "I'm no fan of physical contact with other people" significantly controversial or noteworthy for you to mention it? I'm far from the only person who feels like that.

I thought people were often condemned for saying "America: Love it or leave it" when directed at liberals and others who were unhappy with various things here? Why should it be different for me and mine?

You said that your family has to live in it. They don't. Simple matter of fact.

Now, do you have proof that unmarried couples having sex is contributing significantly to the downfall of society, or don't you?

Aside from whether it's consequential, it clearly is present in the post, so there is a liar here and it's not me.

I'd say that feeling like that is fairly uncommon, though I don't doubt that there are others. And they're probably unremarkable. What makes it notable in your case - as shown here - is how it feeds into your general disgust regarding sexuality and your subsequent desire to put limits on how it is expressed, the personal freedoms of everyone else be damned.

A google search has produced a number of links to sources. But everyone I've seen is from a group such as a religious group (varying ones) so I doubt you would accept them. If you agree to accept links to those sources and their conclusions I'll be glad to post them.

But common sense would indicate that if someone has had sex with only one person that they are going to be reluctant to risk their relationship with that one person by being tempted to have sex with someone else.

Sexual exclusiveness is the only thing (aside from a simple piece of paper) that makes a marriage different from prior relationships.

Totally not a warmonger.

And, you don't see how those sources would be biased?

No, actually, it wouldn't. But, do feel free to show your math on this one.

No, it isn't. But, again, feel free to show your math.

Isn't that rather narrow minded on your part? Assuming my beliefs are simply a narrow reflection of my personal preferences? I can give examples. My dad loved being around women and the company of women. He would've gotten married a third time after my stepmother died had his health not declined. Yet despite those personal preferences his moral beliefs about sexuality were essentially identical to mine.

What makes a marriage different than another relationship if not sexual exclusiveness. You show your math. This is my thread. I'm under no obligation to be the one always required to justify their beliefs.

You're the one making baseless claims. And then you ask someone to prove the inverse? Dayton, I thought you claimed to be some sort of high intellectual. Surely you have the resources available to back up the claims you have made. Surely you hold beliefs based upon logical, demonstrable evidence. Surely you don't make claims based simply on your feelings.

But, if that is how we're going to operate: You're a closet homosexual. Prove the inverse and show your math.

Why not?

I don't think they're only reflections of your personal preferences and I didn't say that they were. I said that your personal preference feeds into it. Obviously whatever religious dogma your family subscribed to is another factor.

It has not escaped my notice that you've performed your usual bait-and-switch here, where you've dropped the matter of your being a liar about the Greatest Hits thread and moved onto a tangentical subject.

You're the one who lied. I have no reason to lie to nobodies on the internet.

Hey @shootER, maybe one day you'll learn how to operate a discussion board.

Fool.

If you do, then that's fine. But you can't do so and still claim to be an intellectual with any degree of integrity when it comes to your beliefs. Saying something along the lines of "It's wrong because I feel like it's wrong" is the antithesis to what you have claimed to be.