As you're all so fond of noting, Clinton was impeached for perjury. Which still makes him an accessory after the fact. Not that I'm pro-bj (actually, I am pro-bj. I wish I were getting one right now), but I am more understanding of Clinton's lie and man's evolutionary need to cheat and then to lie to keep from getting caught.
Please, Nixon did a hell of a lot more bullshit than be in office with the scandal of Watergate. He so extremely abused his power that it's incredible he got off as lightly as he did. I'm certain presidents before and after Nixon did the same thing - presidents of all parties, but Nixon was caught. red handed. by his own tape recordings. that he insisted on having. Man has an evolutionary need to cheat?
Negative. That you think this is even more evidence of your idiocy. However, you clearly BACK IT'S SENTIMENTS, ergo, it's makes no difference if you wrote it or not, as you clearly believe it. Therefore, we can attack the positions within as if you did write them.
How can there be an "evolutionary need to get a blow job"? One cannot impregnate a woman that way so there is no evolutionary pressure involved. In fact, one could argue that any sex act that CANNOT result in pregnancy is "counter evolutionary" because it diverts sexual energies away from actual reproductive acts.
Idle parasites like Nutbird are clearly the target audience for that shrill piece of bitter, ignorant fluff, but I can't see rewarding It with the negative attention It craves.
Nutbird is just angry because it knows deep inside that in order to attain happiness one must WORK for it.
Nixon started the hate for the left by constantly referring to Democrats as "Liberals" in a condescending manner. And, I don't know anyone who blames Nixon for Vietnam. While they blame Kennedy for taking us there, the worst criticism goes to LBJ for escalating our involvement.
Well, one good thing about this guy. Anytime the left trots out Glenn Beck and his histrionics as representative of all conservatives, a quick mention of this nimrod should result effectively end the debate....
Works for me! Dear Journal... today I once more agreed with Clyde. I think tonight I'll have a ham sandwich, a dill pickle, and a cold Coke. All my love, amen. XOXO John I don't think it's that big of a deal. Yes, he did lie under oath, and I'd have rather he didn't. Just come clean (no pun intended) and say what you did. Of course, I'd rather it had been between Hillary, Bill, Monica and God to get it all sorted out. There was no business for the nation there, just gossip. As for Nixon, I consider what he did much worse. So both bad, but there is nuance in there. Hey, I can't be expected to keep track of all my wheelings and dealings! J.
Right & Left Left vs Right It's ALL bullshit When I stand directly in front of someone, their left is my right. & my left is their right. 6 are half a dozen of the other Dummy up people
Biological imperative to spread our seed as far as possible. See above. I didn't say how our seed is spread, or that it is logical (see: condoms), but in some men it can be overwhelming. In order to stay monogomous (sp?), men must overcome this. Some are better than others. I don't excuse it, but I understand it.
Well said. I didn't even know Air America was listened to by anyone. Far as that rant goes, it isn't anything different from what the extreme far left has been whining about for years. I don't even know where to begin with that garbage there is so many inaccuracies. Far as me getting angry? Please.There are far more things to worry about than the rantings of an ignorant leftist. It seems to me that the left is getting worried about the sagging approval ratings of their chosen one and the impending failure of their health care plan. If this is how they handle adversity then I can't wait to see their reaction when their party loses control of washington.
A few comments: 1. That chart is insufficient to position the ideologies shown. Are we to be believe that fascists favor even more individual freedom than classical liberals or libertarians? Or that fascists are as far from totalitarianism as it's possible to get? Of course not. That's ridiculous. 2. The Nazis were definitely not communists (and certainly not of the Marxist persuasion), however they WERE socialists. 3. The political compass--where economic and individual liberty are the axes--shows a much better position of relative philosophies. Hitler and the Nazis are more a centrist (economic) totalitarian (individual liberty) phenomenon, but they are definitely to the left of anyone in American politics.
Mike Malloy. Now there is a name I haven't heard in a very long time. In 1993, I had just moved to Atlanta and was working as a courier. I was going through a 'retirement from music' period back then, so instead of listening to music channels, I got turned on to talk radio. In my opinion, that was the heyday of talk radio in Atlanta. On WGST, we had a younger Sean Hannity in the morning opposite Neil Boortz on WSB. Also on WSB in the evening, Mike Malloy was the only liberal talk show guy on the air, but he more than made up for being the only one. You'll note that he was on in the evening. None of his target audience would have been awake if he had a morning show. Mike Malloy is a true piece of shit. The absolute prototype for the angry, bitter, whiney, red-eyed, bed-wetting, sarcastic, name-calling, elitist, self-righteous parasite liberal. From the time his show began until it ended, it was a nonstop stream of name calling and lies. Democratic Underground hasn't got shit on Mike Malloy. Well, around 1994 when things went bad for his masters in Washington, Mike did on air what most emotionally crippled liberals do at some point in their life. He completely snapped. Went absolutely fucking berzerk. After that, Mike disappeared. Years later, I was AM surfing on a long trip and heard a familiar, whiney, condescending bitch on a station and realized that I had found the little bitch again. This time in Chicago. I can't tell you how awesome it is that he hasn't changed a bit. If you've never listened to Mike Malloy, try to sometime. He is every liberal stereotype magnified times 1000.
Nightbird agrees: I'm not here to impress any of you motherfuckers Yet there is a difference between getting our attention and impressing us. You should want to get our attention.
Give us the list of abuses you sorry sack of shit. Oh that's right you CAN'T. Married to women like you? FUCK YEAH.
http://www.amazon.com/Abuse-Power-New-Nixon-Tapes/dp/0684851873 http://www.c-span.org/executive/presidential/nixon.asp http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/23/nixon.tapes/ Among other things on these tapes, you'll hear about his attempt to have John Lenon deported! - a threat to national security for crying out loud. Talk about a waste of presidential resources. The list is incredible. But, you do need to, you know, listen for yourself rather than let Rush or Bill tell ya what it says. :rollseyes: Oh. Ow. I'm really hurt. That's pathetic.
No, but men and women have the evolved the ability to rationalize behavior in themselves that they feel guilty about or find contemptible in others, whether the rationalization be by religion, evolutionary psych nonsense babble, Randian discipleship, racism, or any other similar tool.
Just to point out something, I think the chart works two fold. Like the political compass it goes left to right, but also up and down to indicate libertarian to authoritarian indices as well, with up being authoritarian, and down being more libertarian. At least, that's how I read it.
