Do we want to talk about no-fault divorce?

I have made it as clear as I can. Re-read what you just quoted, and COMPREHEND it this time.

Dicky successfully avoids distraction and finishes his deranged cackle spell for 15 points of damage to the UA.

Okay, I do think there should be consistency required there. If you file for a faster, cheaper no-fault stating that your partner didn't do anything awful enough to justify a fault divorce, you shouldn't get to change your tune later and claim they were so awful during your marriage that it should give you an upper hand in later negotiations.

the secret word has been uttered, everyone must drink.

Tererune failed her boredom check and must move on.

A conversation was started, and I contributed. You might try THAT for a change if you're feeling left out.

Either remove the financial incentives, or remove the no-fault option. That will be my position.

In the sense that the cat jumping in the grocery bag is "helping with the groceries".

Had a few drinks lol. Welp, now I'm going to have to go beat my wife to help cope with my embarrassment

Facts you can't refute. Your turd flinging routine is irrelevant.

I can, but I'm not gonna play a rabbit-hole game you really don't give a fuck about.
You're just here to troll.

UA wants the state as involved as possible in people's personal lives, including forcing them to stay together apparently.

If men are so worried about women fucking them over, they should be more circumspect in where they CHOOSE to stick their dick.

Period.

End of discussion.

Quit blaming women for your own poor choices.

Boom. Lock the thread.

But I haven't run out of popcorn yet!

I'm sorry but that ridiculous. So if she cheated on you then you get the house and she gets only weekend visitation? What if you had a side-chick and a secret bank account? Does she get 1 dinner a week on Wednesdays you forfeit the car?

The exact opposite. I don't want them indentured into financially supporting ex spouses.

Bullshit. Bull fucking shit. Quit pretending men are mind readers or women are incapable of being duplicitous.

Then use LegalZoom to draft an airtight prenup, and stop begging the government to legislate it for you.
Socialist pinko.

What if some other silly fucking example?

No such thing. She can claim she was coerced, or the judge can just set it aside for bullshit reasons.

Nice bullet dodge, Remo.

If that's true, that is pretty bad. Sad as well

What if some other silly fucking example?

Ridiculous hypotheticals deserve nothing more.

You should beware, there is this really stupid guy who quotes things out of context and he is really fucking stupid, but he would trim that up to make it look like you drink and hit your wife. Then he would post stalk you and link back to this.......

Oh I get it now, we have to pay attention so we know you are still with the CHUDs my little cutie pie. Now go call me hitler again, you know that totally gets me every time you do it. Who is a worthless boy? Oh it's you. You are the worthless boy.

The difference is my examples exist in reality.

No one forced them to get married in the first place. That is one foreseeable consequence of marriage - that one might get divorced. Should people not be responsible for their choices?

I am not amused, he did not fling me around once. Oh wait, my name is tererune not turderun.

I am just always getting confused.

and the bard makes his save against UA's shitty illusion spell.