Do You Believe the Investigation(s) of Donald Trump & administration has been fair and unbiased?

What is more is there are so many institutional controls at the FBI even if one man is biased it won't effect the outcome. For instance each piece of evidence has to be agreed upon by two investigators and the decision to bring charges or not is brought to an independent five person expert panel.

So the lies and the smears of the far right about supposed bias because some guy texted his girlfriend during a national election to discuss which candidate each of them liked is garbage. Republicans are grasping at straws desperately trying to discredit law enforcement because they know their guy is guilty as hell.

That forum seems to have a lot of antisemitic threads.

Lying sack of dog shit. I do not post antisemitic threads.

But you are a massive racist.

Yet again you prove yourself to be a liar. Further more, you prove yourself too stupid to understand the difference between speaking out against an evil ideology which calls for others to be killed because of their personal beliefs... and race.

Hell, you keep claiming race doesn't even exist yet stupidly claim some how racism can exist. You aren't even knowledgable enough to know that said evil ideology of violence is multiethnic and multiracial, you dimwit.

The problem has always been one of ideology and not race, you stupid lying baboon.

I understand the difference very well. This is always your standard claim, but you've let the mask slip far too many times by speaking about the people you dislike in racial and ethnic terms.

Those are not contradictory claims. "Race" is not a scientific concept. Those who claim that is is, and make distinctions based on that, are racists.

But if race is not a scientific concept, then how can you call people racist? Wouldn't a better term be preference?

Racists are those who connote that race is a scientific concept. Is that clearer?

Your right. They tolerate some real nutters over there. 9-11 Truthers as well.

Now you are just a drooling imbecile. "If you believe history, all cultural references, or your lying eyes over me then you are a waycist!.

The poor simple, deluded boy, has had his head up his on ass for so long he now thinks it is normal. Also, sorry, but despite your revisionist nonsense genetic differences are simply a sciebtific fact. You are right that how we group those genetic differences is based upon a bit of subject opinion and historical presidence but your claim that those genetic differences do not exist is just more vomit and wishful thinking from revisionisy liar. Fact.

Translation: "If you disagree with my made up made up politically motivated nonsense then I will lie and call you names!"

Yes, genetic differences are scientific fact. No, that doesn't mean that different races are real.

Nice meltdown though.

I am sorry you are simple minded and fail to understand what the Koran explicitly says. That is more a reflection upon your incompetence and general refusal to acknowledge facts or reality than anything else.

Shit, you are the one having a meltdown babbling nonsense that anyone who disagrees with you is a "racist". Laughing at you and calling you stupid for saying something like that is how normal people should react.

http://time.com/91081/what-science-says-about-race-and-genetics/

Anyway, social construct theory is garbage, always has been garbage, and always will be garbage. It relies upon the faulty assumption that human evolution stopped in the ancient past and has not continued into the present plus it also ignores humans breeding with various proto-human groups who had been in different parts of Asia and Europe for millions of years. Supposedly, genetic analysis shows that there were at least three of these ancient human cousins which various ethnic groups/races have interbred with to different degrees.

Look, I know they think they are lying for a good cause, to pretend that race does not exist, but they are still just degenerate hack liars. Fact.

I guess I don’t understand what you mean by “real” as race is just genetic classification.

Do you mean poodles are just as valuable as chihuahuas? Or poodles and chihuahuas are genetically indistinguishable? Or you shouldn’t classify by breeds, just one large canine family?

Your hint that it is nothing more than opinion and nonsense is that it came from a "social scientist" instead of a real scientist. It is political spin and double speak and nothing more. The people who preach this nonsense should be clubbed in the head like a baby seal.

He is trying to say all dogs are dogs and it is imaginnary, unreasonable, and unreal that we break dogs down into discrete breeds. Yes, they are all one species, no, they are not all one breed (which is all a race is). It's a word game designed to score political points and ignore factual reality and nothing more.

You must've been castrated and had your tail bobbed at an early age if you think selective breeding of dogs is analogous to human diversity.

Even humans belong to the animal kingdom. And there are many, many breeds of dogs subject to natural selection (e.g. jackals, wolves, etc.).

There are thousands, millions even, of other species which have scientifically recognized subspecies. I reject your ignorant and uninformed notion that subspecies (or we can all them breeds or we could call them races) do not exist. You are simply an arrogant and ignorant tosser trying to push political nonsense and pretending that it is some how science. Hint: It is not. That is why it is only "social scientists" pushing this scientifically illiterate nonsense while actual scientists say something completely different.

Take your political garbage and stop trying to pretend it has anything to do with science because it does not.

Why do you keep putting social science in quotations? Are you insinuating that social/behavioral science is not a legitimate discipline?

So which one is it?

Because, as my chemistry professor at UCSB used to say they are not real sciences. Just humanities trying to pretend they are real sciences, which they are not. That is why all the real scientists base there positions on facts and evidence while "social scientists" generally just vague bull shit feelings and double talk. Even when they try to pretend to do studies which ape real science they are full of opinion and outside influences which means they are not real science.