I've found many religious writers with aspirations to academia fall into that category. Being driven by your faith makes it very difficult indeed to present a case which stands up to rational analysis unless you are willing to evaluate it from a neutral perspective, at which point it stops really being "faith"
I think you're misunderstanding one another there. Unless I am very much mistaken, you're both saying that faith is not something that the faithful examine from a neutral perspective, at least not when they deal with it AS faith.
By the way, I tried a hot sauce rated at 6 million Scoville units recently. I can tell you that was too far for Paladin.
Maybe not, but the point was the moment you start rationally analysing a thing or employing critical thinking it no longer falls under the remit of faith.