I am sorry, to the women in the room. This is from the white men.

the playing field for LGBTQ or for all minorities? Because here in the US in some situations that field has definitely flipped. Once that quota has been met it just keeps going & going. Your mileage may vary in your location.

Can you give an example?

yes I could, but being a white conservative male I would be accused of whining & complaining & being a snowflake & racist & whatnot.

I'm assuming you aren't going to claim the LGBTQ community have sweeping advantages over us surely?

not at all. I have no experience with any LGBTQ people (that I know of anyway) in my peer group or work environment. My son knows a guy he went to high school with who became a woman or maybe vice-versa and him & all his friends are cool with the idea. I'm guessing they are a very small percentage of the total population of my neighborhood which is heavily military/law enforcement in some way, shape or form. They do have a big "gay pride" parade and festival in Augusta every summer, but I won't go to any parade or festival. I don't like crowds or heat!

I'm not misgendering anyone. You dudes are the ones misrepresenting yourselves. I'm not the man trying to expose himself in the little girl's room, you are.

You third rambling paragraph is just nonsense. Ironic that you're trying to spin your attraction to young girls though...get help.

That's some serious accusations you're making, do you have a shred of evidence to back them up?

If not you might want to think very carefully about what you are being quite blase in suggesting about people.

You might be surprised how many of those people are simply choosing a life in the closet, I can't say for sure...

That is just him. It is TLS. for the most part he is an obvious troll who uses an obvious lame. The effectiveness of the bathroom stalker line is actually brought down by the use by such an over the top character.

I'm a bit confused by this association to be honest, does @TheLonelySquire realise that proportionately the demographic most likely to abuse children is straight white cis males I wonder?

God forbid we mention the tendency for them to be members of a church fraternity (pun intended)

He has been taken aside and forced to undergo church reeducation regarding pedophelia in the ranks. It sounds like church therapy class to pray the gay away and make it look like they are doing something. I forget the name of the cult it was in, but it pops up with him every so often. I would imagine he is aware it is there, and he probably is not familiar with other groups numbers on molesting children. I would imagine the church has not presented him with the fact that transgender molesters are much more rare than religious molesters. Typical religious information bubble.

He is also right wing so he does not want to see anything but what reinforces his bubble.

I'm sure all of the thousands who have been molested by priests will take endless comfort in that, strange though how I actually feel much safer around trans people than men of the cloth.....

In all honesty I would be wary of anyone because a little bit of security can save a lot of damage. I am not saying don't let anyone touch your kids, but being alone with them is something that should be monitored. It is not just molestation, they are finding abuse from nannies and babysitters too. The problem with the churches is they have not embraced video monitoring and having multiple adults around at all times. I am not saying all priests are evil, but rather that like schoolteachers priests get trusted with the young so that is where a pedophile will seek to be if there is one.

This should have been your response to post #1 in this thread. Accusing someone without a shred of evidence?

You mean like you accuse trans people of trying to molest people in the bathroom.

Not at all, there's plenty of reason to genuinely suspect Kavanaugh did exactly what he is accused of, but a court of law has deemed it insufficient to make a legally binding case.

@Tererun, on the other hand, has not even the least whiff of suspicion about her as far as I know. Just your bigotry which is actually based not only on a lack of data, but strong data to the contrary. Add into that your apparent anti abuse training (whatever that may consist of) was actually delivered by the very social entity which is notorious (and correctly so) not only for failing to prevent abuse, but to actively support it and cover it up.

There's zero reason to suspect Kavanaugh of anything, not to mention any evidence.

@Tererun otoh, is a biological man who wears dresses. There's plenty of data supporting this.

Numerous people have accused Kavanaugh of serious crimes, that's a reason to suspect him.

No one has accused @Tererun of anything, except you plucking things out of thin air. Wearing a dress is not a crime.

Baseless, uncorroborated accusations weighed against 7 FBI investigations are not a reason to suspect anything, unless of course you are motivated by political ideology.

I never said wearing a dress would or should be a crime. I fully endorse his choice to be a colossal life fuck up. I even endorse his drug addiction. It's his life to waste.

Numerous word of mouth allegations are, they just aren't enough to put together a legal case, but that's beside the point here, you've accused @Tererun of being a child molester. What exactly have you based that on?

I would like data on that. Please express the data in rates (such as pedos per 100,000 pop). Let us see what the sex offender rates really are.

Again @Dinner, I find myself posting a perfectly factual statement and you declare "fantasy".

Just to be clear, the group statistically most likely to sexually assault children are straight, cis males. Deal with it.

Actually Turdrun has admitted to being in jail multiple times for both drug offenses and for sex offenses such as working as a cross dressing gay prostitute.

So you do have the crime rates for various groups broken down for sex offenses? Good, let us see them as you are probably very, very different from what you are claiming.

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Violent-crime/Rapes-per-million-people

Not all sex crimes but starting with rape it is amazing how sub Saharan Africa has orders of magnitude higher rates of rape rate. It is all those cis white males, eh, dullard?

It is amazing how they are also sky high in Muslim countries, huh? Tell us again about how cis white males are the problem.

Actually neither. Identity theft was the charge. I do drugs, and I only charge your mom for sex.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/11/are-sex-offenders-white/

Oh, look at that! African-American males have the highest rate of sex offenses in the U.S not the cis white males some people have claimed. How could @spot261 have gotten it so wrong?

Actually that does not confict with what he said. He said the group most likely to molest are cis white males. Since they far outnumber black males they are still the most likely to molest because there are more than them. Not only are you racist, you are also a dullard.

Wrong. “Most likely” is a function of rates not absolute numbers. Please return to junior high school.

The fact is the rates for white males are well below both blacks and Hispanics.

"In all honesty I would be wary of anyone because a little bit of security can save a lot of damage. I am not saying don't let anyone touch your kids, but being alone with them is something that should be monitored. It is not just molestation, they are finding abuse from nannies and babysitters too. The problem with the churches is they have not embraced video monitoring and having multiple adults around at all times. I am not saying all priests are evil, but rather that like schoolteachers priests get trusted with the young so that is where a pedophile will seek to be if there is one."

yes very good point (I took the liberty of highlighting) about church video monitoring. Because most churches (especially small ones) are such a tight-knit community it would offend a lot of people daring to suggest that you don't trust "brother Tom" or "sister Lisa" to be with your kids. Also many small church members have been in their communities for years and often work with and have professional relationships with fellow church families that run deep. In other words a lot of toes can be stepped on both in and out of the church. Nothing wrong with becoming a church member ,but if you are a "family first" kind of guy like myself - you tend to keep your church in an arm's distance kind of relationship.

If I were that guy in the bible who was told to sacrifice his son until god said "PSYCH!" at the last second I would have said "fuck that! I'll go worship the sun god or something - you are seriously twisted!"