It's the Majorie Taylor Greene thread!

sigh
get a new schtick besides projecting, m'kay?

you are neither clever nor edgey.

Nice evasion. I'm sure nobody noticed.

this is exactly what I'm talking about... :eyeroll:

you really do see things this way, don't you?

Still pretending that words don't lead to actions?

That they can be tenuously connected doesn't mean they are to blame. You take an action, you alone are responsible for that choice, regardless of what was said to you.

Couldn't get a good military up and running that way.

I guess in your world inciting to riot is not a crime.

Edit @Diacanu

There is truth to that. You would have to ask a military person how they navigate it.

In my world, threats and incitement are a separate category from words that are just mean and hurtful.

In YOUR world, too. In EVERYONE'S world. But some people seem to struggle with the concept.

And no, if @Bailey reads this, that was not an invitation to some tedious, long-winded lawyerballing.

Yoi’re wrong, but maybe if you type it on all caps and getreally outraged, that’ll make everyone think you’re right.

Yes, we know that your views nowadays are mostly just expressed via red hot raging vibes, rather than any sort of rationality.

He always makes it about cancelled edge-lord comedians.

When, if I were a true towering intellect, I would just say "you're wrong" without elaborating, then mince off on my merry way.

I don't think the Orange Man Bad club needs me to prop it up.

Rationality would be a good starting point for correcting this diseased mentality of "offense is injury and words are violence. "

And no, you may not ask me to google search a notorized, verbatim quote for you.

Geez, he just can't get the whole "effeminate = weak/stupid" thing de-programmed out of his head.
In spite of that a drag queen creamed the Club Q shooter.

Making a lot of hay out of a single word, there. Maybe it's possible to mince in a manly masculine way. You don't know. Don't project your gender norms on everyone else.

If you have to act defensive about creating a strawman have you considered not building one?

I just know that game, and it's not worth putting any effort into what will be dismissed as an unworthy source or a narrow anecdote. I'm sure a two second google search on "words are violence" will yield you a dozen insufferable screechbags (that's not gendered, Diacanu, so shut the fuck up) figuratively shouting into an echo chamber of like-minded screechbags, physical or virtual.

http://wordforge.net/index.php?posts/3445604/

He tries to do the same thing with me. This why I say that I’m not playing games with him. It’s glaringly obvious what he’s trying to do.

I would totally haul my groceries home in a Screech bag. But I want the Stabby Screech version.

How? You've never actually tried.

FF has, and yeah, gets dismissed because we actually have clicked his links and found them... well... not of great quality.

y'know? critical thinking and all that which the public schools system may have taught but y'all seem not to have learned?

still, a two second google search in those terms would yield hundreds of results probably because so much has been written on the subject that disagrees with your dismissive claim.

take some responsibility for once, m'kay? you keep using that word and it means a fuck of a lot more than you think it means

I've NEVER posted or linked to a source? Bullshit. Maybe not in the last five fucking minutes, but your brain damage isn't my problem.

Be specific about where your swiss cheesed excuse for a fucking brain thinks I have failed at critical reasoning. Not a lazy copy and paste or a link to someone else's thoughts.

You can't just take the emotional position you feel is most virtuous and hold it up as the objective, logical standard for everyone.

"I know you are but what am I?"
"Nuh uh YOU are teh thing!"

I and several others have linked to your post history in the past.

I'm sure there exist a few posts where you have linked to something relevant, but 98% of your content is spent trying to claim imaginary high grounds that nobody cares about.

So it's a "read your own post history to make my arguments " tactic. Can't say I expected any better, but your "point" remains unsupported .

sigh
and here we see the "it's a tactic" tactic, followed by dismissal.

it's like your signature move...

no matter, dubious you're self reflective enough to get it anyways.

I mean, seriously.

I tell you your post history is mostly vapid narcissism, you demand proof, I direct you to the proof, you reject it as playing games or some such nonsense.

Starting to get why you're a laughingstock?

How can someone be a laughingstock if they're not funny?

Ali Alexander is threatening to release evidence that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene "committed a crime" that will get her expelled from Congress: "I will not suffer this harlot. I will not be taught vows and loyalty, commitment from a whore!"

https://twitter.com/rightwingwatch/status/1611025349030318082