It appears that the Congressional Black Caucus members do indeed need to apologize for their hateful speech. Many people (myself included) have looked for the videos substantiating their claims, however, there has been NO corroboration of the accusations they have hurled. They owe the Tea Party members an immediate apology.
It's despicable to accuse people of shit they didn't do. These fuckers are like some drunk frat chick accusing innocent men of raping her for attention and sympathy. They denigrate every black person who truly suffered from a racist incident and acts like this just fosters hate among the ethnicities. Unconscionable.
They should apologize. Then they should all die in a fire. I'd settle for just the dying in a fire part. It's a much more realistic possibility.
Like I said, anything to marginalize and let's add denigrate any opposition. I'm not holding my breath for an apology, best that can be hoped for is shining a light on them and showing them for the cockroaches they are. It's grown so tiresome.
They might be more likely to get an apology of sorts, if they stop terrorizing people who voted for the bill with death threats and the like. (And don't tell me that at least *some* aren't behind that shit...)
Do you have any evidence for that, or is it just a convenient explanation stemming from your own prejudices, that doesn't require any facts to back it up?
Not only that, it can't work that way. "UNICORNS ARE REAL! PROVE TO ME THEY DON'T EXIST!" "Um, how? By not showing you a unicorn horn?"
No, my point is that you guys play fast and loose with reason and logic whenever it suits you. Example: if someone gets murdered, is it a fiction until someone gets charged and/or convicted? Just because no one's been charged AT PRESENT, doesn't mean it didn't happen. It cuts both ways. Could these threats have been a fabricated lie? Possibly. But how many? All of them? And what's more likely?
I will just assume that formal logic was not your major in college and not take you to task too strongly for the glaring fallacy in your post. Instead, I will simply clarify my point: Where is your evidence that the Tea Party people are behind any of those death threats and other actions? That was your claim, not that they existed. Are you just making up the connection between them and the Tea Party, without any actual facts, simply because it fits your personal prejudices, or do you have some evidence linking the two?
Do I really have to point out why this is a horrible example? Then where is the evidence? It's like with all those videos where despite claims to the contrary, no racial slurs can be heard being shouted on any of them and no one can be seen spitting.
http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart...vernment (Big Government)&utm_content=Twitter So Andrew Brietbart has $100K on the table for anyone who can produce recorded evidence - and still there is none? :nonono: Further: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/04/how_quickly_spread_the_tea_par.html That from Jack Cashill at American Thinker, amended by Doug Ross: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2010/04/busted-smoking-gun-proof-that-democrats.html Cue the Gallant Defenders of the unbiased media... Beyond that - one wonders if the self respecting leftist can bring him or herself to condemn such blatant race-baiting, or does "ends justify the means"?
Too easy. And, Async. This one doesn't even require a college education in logic. If there was any real proof of this it would've shown up by now.
This should make Asyncritus cringe... Source. Yep, that is the AP wanting Breitbart to provide evidence of a negative. Can't these fuckers just give it up and admit they were wrong?
Pretty fucking sad if someone is offering you money for 'evidence' and you can't come up with it. If that isn't an admission of you made shit up, I don't know what is.
^ In any case, as many people as there are walking around with cell phone cameras recording things, someone would have caught a bunch of prominent congressmen walking through and would have corroborated the story. To explain the silence despite a huge reward offered, you have to assume that not one single person recorded it who was opposed to it happening, favorable to the congressmen, or simply willing to collect a huge reward. (And that, despite Chris's assurances that all these people are unemployed.) Lack of proof does not equal proof of lack, but under the circumstances it is beginning to come pretty close.
Exactly - these days every schoolyard fight, kittens bowel movement, celebrity nipple slip etc. is on the internet thanks to every man, woman + child having a camera of some sort.
I've heard that Black Caucus members are the kind of people who will come to your house stumping for votes and stop up your toilet.
