Jenee Sexbot 2063 tangent from MC

This makes @Bill Carson 's sammich career and hate for trans women all make sense now.

I was gonna say "get ready for more fucking homeless people then! ".

Course, the ancient world's solution to keeping women off the streets was forced arranged marriages.
Which is what incels want to bring back.
Given that incels make 99% of the crap propaganda UA watches on Youtube, I'm surprised he isn't for it.

What the fuck is this?

UA and Jenee's public humiliation kink is so fucking weird.

Exactly.

One wonders how much spousal support would be needed to keep up UA's lifestyle of living in a brokedick Jeep down by the river? Maybe a couple Arby's ketchup packets and a dead racoon? How much could @Jenee cost?

Maybe, in some very narrow and explicitly defined cases, but it does nothing to justify the "accustomed lifestyle" horse shit.

They're all liberated, strong and independent now. They can get a goddamn job and live within their means.

Corporate America says otherwise.

Corporate America would staff 100% women if it were legal to pay them less.

Again, we get back to laws that adversely affect women also adversely affect men.

Except divorce and family courts do NOT treat women and men the same.

Can you provide recent stats showing that? Cuz I don't believe that is the case. I'm not even certain it ever was. Just men of means bitching cuz they had to pay to swap out their wives for a younger version.

Seriously, if he wanted to buy a hot wife, then he has to accept responsibility for keeping her in the lifestyle in which she has become accustomed if he wants to trade her in.

That's life. Suck it.

But you're also against no fault divorces, aren't you? So presumably in this perfect world you're imagining, the partner demanding their "accustomed lifestyle" is only losing it in the first place because their spouse cheated or beat the shit out of them. I could certainly see an argument for compensation in situations like that, similar to how an employee could sue their former employer for damages.

This is a fun one. I especially like the increased chance of divorce when the man makes less money.
https://farzadlaw.com/divorce-statistics#

That shit's the core of MRA bullshit.
They start you on the "men should get custody more" stuff, then next thing you know it's "Norway is a utopia cuz no black people".
I had an ex-friend go on this ride. It never has a happy ending.

That's crap. If you're reducing it to a transaction like that, if he loses access to her "hotness," she should lose access to his money.

Cheating and abuse would be a better argument for a pay day. As in, the cheater/abuser can only ever be the one who either gets nothing, or does the PAYING.

One problem with that would be shitbag lawyers diluting the concept of "abuse" to cover basically anything, with little or no obligation to prove it.

While your link does show that men and women are treated differently, it doesn't say men get screwed in divorces more often than women do - in fact, it says the opposite.

He knew when he married her she was going to age and lose her looks. He bought it. He broke it. He pays for it.

Actually, this is not a new problem. Men have been dealing with this very issue long before there even was a US. Wealthy men have had to deal with finding a sex object who will be devoted to him and his needs and he pays "alimony" or "retirement" or whatthefuckever.

You must have a creative definition for "screwed. " I'm talking outcomes in court.

OR, she wore out her welcome and forfeited her meal ticket.

So you get to assume she was this loving, devoted spouse. Never a hypergamous mercenary.

Entirely possible.

She could be either. But, as people tend to be attracted to people similar to them, if she is, chances are, he is too. So, in my opinion, they deserve each other.

Missed this, but not necessarily.

Oh I never said they thrived afterwards. Only that family courts are biased in favor of them.

so, you want women to be even more worse off?