Jews bitch about (vaguely) swastika shaped retirement home

So you agree it's NOT "exactly" the same as a swastika.

Then why ask me about the square, when I have already said the swastika shape isn't objectioable?

Still not letting you turn it around. Defend the position you started with, or concede the point.

never mind...you just did

What point? I had two, and I'm defending both:

(1) The shape of the swastika is not objectionable.

(2) The shape of the swastika is significantly more complex and unique than that of a circle or square.

I never said either [1] and [2] weren't true, but nice Packarding again on [2].

You changed my claim that complexity is irrelevant into a false claim that there was no difference in geometric complexity between a square and a swastika. Three times now you've tried to change the argument, and I'm having none of it.

Now address the real issue. Or concede the point.

In a lame, pedantic, trying to make a point by being as picky as humanly possible way, you have a slight point. It's not "exactly" the correct proportions of the approved Nazi swastika symbol as used on their flags and vehicles. It is, however, shaped exactly like a swastika, to anyone with rational perceptions who isn't trying to be pedantic and argumentative.

I claim the complexity and uniqueness of the swastika is relevant to its significance. You deny this. You compare it to circles and squares. I call that comparison unfounded. And meanwhile, you try to change that disagreement into a disagreement about objectionability, which it isn't.

No, I say that the complexity of the symbol is irrelevant. If it were a square instead of a swastika, then it would be a square that is burned into the psyche.

That being the case, it would be much harder to avoid a square in everyday life.

Thus, GOSUB Post #18.

Yeah, and I deny this, for 3 reasons I have repeated several times now. Instead of addressing them, you have repeated that to you, complexity seems irrelevant. Which is your prerogative. Meanwhile, I will continue saying what I have argued for all along.

BTW, Japan DID have a circle as its symbol during WW2. And yet that shape is not "burned into the psyche" the way the swastika is.

Essentially you're saying that the only reason they have a symbol to hate is because it isn't a simple shape. But what if it was?

What if the Nazi flag had been the current flag of Japan?

Again, luckily not, and GOSUB Post #18.

Which ethnic group is the Jewish counterpart regarding hatred of a shape for Japan?

Chinese?

Perhaps. Is there anything round in China?

Not eyes!

No, there are extra line segments in the building which are not present in a swastika. Your statement is like saying a square is exactly the same as a pentagon. They're not exactly the same, although there is a similarity.

That's because the Jews have a better marketing department.

You're an engineer, aren't you.