Already asked and answered. That you are incapable of understanding the answer in no way obligates me to provide a new and different answer.
Claiming to know how Richard Simmon's responded to an ad for a particular sex toy, is about a thousand times gayer.
Also, this thread is about John Castle. Who likes vaping. Which is really a form of cock-smoking. Ergo, this thread is double gay.
Castle isn't gay. Not according to this anyhow... https://twitter.com/visionrazor/status/271423321269219328
Who's to say it isn't you? And by you, I mean the character, not any one particular person who's running him.
Of course a girl is going to limp away when you ask her to scissor you and she ain't got but one leg. How insensitive.
But haven't you previously and recently claimed you are often lying on here and orchestrating a massive troll? How do we know that the Twitter account isn't set up by you - or at least someone you are conspiring with?
To be fair, the author of that twitter account is a far better writer than John Castle could ever hope to be, so while it may be his co-conspirator it's not him.
So you claim to be the only person behind the persona? Very interesting. I hope you have a trademark, because some of the others might not agree with your claim.
Well, now, I wonder why I would lie here. It really is a mystery, isn't it? I mean, with the completely dishonest shit you people pull, what ever could possess me to be less than forthcoming with all of you?
That's not a parody. It's an impersonation. Interestingly, Twitter does not share your sense of humor about that kind of thing.
Then what credible belief are we supposed to have that you have no involvement in that Twitter account? Can't have it both ways skinofdouche. Either it's a big "amusing" troll by you, or you're being truthful about things. Which is it? If you are routinely lying then I that that confirms what I have always said, that you are desperate for attention in any way possible.
Why haven't you had it shut down then? Well, I know why, because a a quick Google of Twitter's rules shows why.... 1) You have no trademark. 2) The account name is "visionrazor", not your real name or the other handle you use on there. 3) The bio says "not the failed writer", it it's not claiming to be you. Therefore, parody, no? Seems to me that you would have tried to have it taken down if it breached the rules, which suggests that either you tried and failed, or you were content for it to stay to either generate some attention for yourself or you were otherwise involved in it.
