Jordan Peterson is not an evolutionary biologist.

I do not support Elon, therefor I cannot in good faith click on any twitter link at this point. It used to be somewhat generic when twitter was not owned by Trump loving Nazis, but for a non-news source I cannot even do one click. I know @Tuckerfan is now an elon fansucker, and I wish him well withy his new Tesla, but I am not going to twitter to read about Jordan Peterson. If that means JP will never again be seen by me because no real news source will report on his twitter tirades because they are so full of shit, then my brain is better off.

I do look forward to seeing JP cry like a little baby when people find it on youtube.

Or, conversely, it could be that this is a case of, "Look at what this idiot fucknugget has said. It's so fucking stupid that no matter what else this guy might say, he just needs to be ostracized from society." But that idea never occurred to your paranoid, narcissistic ass, did it? Nope. You just automatically assumed that people were trying to lay some kind of trap for you. As if anyone here would waste their time thinking about you and ways to pull a "Gotcha!" moment.

They watched another one. Jordy P is concerned you're not spanking it enough, it seems.

not like it'd take much thought...

In other words, that's EXACTLY what it was.

That shitty, mindless purity absolutism is what needs to be purged from society.

Well, you're not good at convincing people of your brilliant ideas with awe inspiring rhetoric and charisma, so I can only assume you mean gory waves of fascist violence.

I mean your hive mind voluntarily coming to its senses without intervention, of course.

Again, you're not a charismatic rhetorician, so "intervention" must mean gory fascist violence.
Go on, give in to it, be the murderer you always wanted to be.
Make me right forever.

You keep trying to call people here out for having a hive mind when you literally sound like every single angry, anti-SJW, white incel dude that ever existed

It's funny

In other words, that's the only result your "with us or against us" programming is capable of returning.

Yeah, you're just chock full of originality.
You're a regular 80's Marvel bullpen.
The house of ideas you are.

Jesus, the whole elevatorgate, gamergate, anti-SJW shitpile bubbled up from the floorboards in 2012.
11 years its been going on.
A decade and change now.
And they all say the same shit, and it's the same exact shit as 2012.
It hasn't evolved.
It ain't gonna.


Edit-
Y'know, it's funny, young Louis CK used to tell a joke about how Klanners have meetings, and he was like "what do they have meetings ABOUT??!?! There's no 'new business' with the Klan. 'Hey, we still hate everyone, right? Okay, meeting adjourned!'".

It's like that with CHUDs, and CK caters to their asses now.
Wild.

No, there's no "In other words" here

You literally sound like a shitty hive mind sub section of society while accusing others of being in a hive mind themselves

I get that you think you're probably a rogue, rough outsider with his own opinions but you're basically interchangeable with the sub section I'm referring to

It's just an observation, no need to get your panties in a twist

Says a guy who wants this done so it will absolutely purify society to his liking.

Tell me, you ever block someone because you couldn’t stand what they posted? You ever skip reading a post or a thread because the author is someone who you don’t like? Then you’ve done the same thing as what you’re claiming to condemn.

Unless it is a rogue hot pocket I don't think UA or any gravy seal is going to do much.

$5 says wrap around sunglasses, a goatee, and knockoff carhartt.

False. I just don't accept anyone imposing their will on me as the cost of doing business.

I'm sure I have, but the difference is in recognizing:


"I don't like this and I refuse to see it" - Perfectly fine.

"I don't like this and I urge you not to see it." - Annoying but still acceptable.

"I don't like this and I feel justified in preventing others from seeing it." -Fascist dickbaggery that needs to die in a fire.

Then you are deliberately misrepresenting me.

You're pretty hypocritical on where you apply the definitions of that.
Spreading your cheeks for your corporate masters, and sucking police boot leather out one side of your mouth, thinking anyone who wants to improve the world is a boogeymen out to drink your blood out the other.
Your bottomless gullible stupidity is only matched by your limitless narcissism.

Nobody is imposing anything while I retain the option of walking away. So much for my corporate masters.

I want bad cops to face appropriate consequences. That means arrest, trial and incarceration, with the same presumption of innocence as anyone else. Refusing to indulge rulings of collective guilt in the court of public opinion doesn't make me a "boot licker," and if it were a group sitting high enough on the victimhood totem pole, I'm sure the fashionable protest kids would permit you to agree with me.

Improve the world. Knock yourself out. Just compromise your own standard of living first, and only involve others on a strictly voluntary basis.

The fuck you don’t. You obey laws. You obey laws. You, presumably, follow social customs.

Great, now point out where I said people should be prevented from seeing what Peterson has to say.

Right there. But I guess "ostracised from society" is open to interpretation.

Nope. I’m literally comparing your words and feelings about matters with the people I’m referring to and not seeing a difference. Science, bitch

Can’t even take responsibility for what you say, not surprising in the least. Another trait you share!

In your case, you imitated the ostrich, but stuck your head in the wrong place.

Dude is basically turning into a televangelist - grifters gotta go where the money is
https://twitter.com/jtbrunton58/status/1611234509630111745?s=20

just a reminder:






Come to think of it, Henry has likely sold more books and been lecturing a lot longer than Jordy.

So...he's Mr. Rogers's Wario?

apologies that some of you will have to find out a second canadian politician's name, but...

Pierre Poilievre challenges Ontario College of Psychologists to a duel over Jordan Peterson’s honour
MARY GILLIS ( @LIVING_MARBLE )


Photo Credit
OTTAWA – Following the news that the College of Psychologists of Ontario have asked clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson to undergo retraining for social media etiquette or lose his licence, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre jumped into the fray and has challenged the College to a duel.

“I may not agree with what Jordan Peterson does online, like calling people pricks while misspelling the word prick, but I will defend to my death his right to do that, literally, with swords or pistols,” Poilievre said in a video released this weekend. “Not just his right to do that, but his right to do that without suffering any consequences from professional organizations.”

Dueling, along with publishing blasphemous libel and practicing witchcraft, was legalized when Canada’s criminal code was updated and modernized in 2017. This would be the first time a sitting MP has resorted to dueling since its legalization, as most Canadian politicians prefer to use blasphemous libel or witchcraft to settle disagreements.

“I demand satisfaction,” Poilievre continued in his video. “We all know free speech means professional licensing bodies cannot take away a man’s licence just because he’s using social media to harass people and bring shame and embarrassment to an entire profession and the licensing organization itself. A powerful man having to deal with any repercussions for his actions is woke tyranny and I won’t stand for it.”

“And to be clear, I’m not defending the honour of Jordan Peterson because I agree with his worldview. The fact that I only challenge duels on behalf of people who share my reactionary politics is a coincidence, and I challenge anyone who says otherwise to a duel.”

The video duel challenge concludes with Poilievere taking off one of his gloves, using it to solemnly slap the air, mailing it to the address for the College he found on their website, then complaining that his hand is cold because of cancel culture.

The College of Psychologists of Ontario has responded to Poilievre’s challenge by asking him questions about his childhood, his homelife, and why he feels so strongly about performatively defending another grown man from having to face the very minor consequences of his actions.

When the Beaverton attempted to reach Jordan Peterson for comment on this story, he replied with an incomprehensible statement that seemed to be about which female body type he finds most attractive, followed by a list of the names and home addresses of everyone who’s ever been mean to him.