Newsmax guest: We need to be more homophobic

In case UA was in any doubt which side he's on.

https://crooksandliars.com/2023/08/newsmax-guest-says-out-loud-we-need-be

Do what?

Rape everybody?
Nope, that was a scare tactic of bad 80's movies with the thumbs up from Reagan, and none of it happened.

Force people at gunpoint into a same-sex marriage?
I mean, that's what "invalidates all marriage" was code for.
None of that went down.

Exist. They don't want gay people to exist.
Hmm, how do you un-exist someone?
Wonder how?
If only the history of fascism showed us how.
They're not radical eliminationists though.
That's melodramatic.

Yeah. Shame.
Matthew Shepard just failed to be ashamed enough, so his killers had to "take it up a notch".

I'm on my own side, answerable only for my own deeds.

Yes and those deeds involve providing aid and comfort. You practically fluff the pillows and hand these sorts a nice mug of cocoa.

Nope. That's just the popular gaslight that hopes to browbeat people into joining the "correct" club.

Yeah, because right-wing indoctrination is just full of hugs, forehead kisses, and soft-spoken passivity.
It's the left who browbeats.
Because contrarian takes are always correct.
That's why ivermectin stopped covid in its tracks, and those million people are alive.

That argument would be plausible if only you weren't so shamelessly parroting people committing and calling for awful deeds while claiming it has absolutely nothing to do with you.

"I don't follow your right or wrong! I go my own way (the wrong way)!"

Yes, we get it, while you will label and group and generalise about everyone else in the world you are the one special true independent.

That I might have some superficially similar sentiment does not mean I have ever heard somone to "parrot" them. Even if I did hear something and agree does NOT mean I endorse everything someone ever said or have any liability for their deeds. Those are not terms you get to impose on people to rationalize silencing dissent.

Yeah, guess what?
"The Nazis are wrong about Jews, holocausts, gypsies, militarily gobbling up countries, and fashion....but they're on to something about trannies and feminists"?
Still not a good look.

Communists: "I'm a communist."

Nazis:

That's some big "I've got nothing to do with farms, I get my food from the store" energy you've got there.

(You know Federal Farmer does the same thing, right?)

If only you regarded other people the same way. (Spoiler: you don't)

No one is "silencing" you, you fuckin' baby. You're just not exempt from criticism.

Still not an honest comparison to any position I hold, either. No matter how hard you and Amaris want the fantasy to be real, you do not get to divide humanity into either "people who agree with you" or "physical incarnations of evil."

And as usual, you support that with absolutely nothing, because REALITY proves stubbornly resistant to your self-serving delusions.

As opposed to dividing it into "Uncle Albert" and "things".

You don't get to tell me how I regard people. You ASK.

And bullshit there aren't any attacks on free speech.

As opposed to addressing people as individuals, not your arbitrary categories.

Tell me more about the pink hairs, and screech bags, and twitter ghouls.

You seem to be under the impression that I was debating your position. I was not. You are a shitty little fascist, and you serve no purpose other than to warn others as to what happens when you're so consumed with your own fart supply that you totally disconnect from other people. I consider your entire posting history my evidence, and like Christian fundamentalists who advocate for lower age of consent laws, you will never understanding how damning that is because you see nothing wrong with it.

Oh, no. I have long since abandoned any notion that you can defend your position. All you have is the sort of pissy, self-obsessed emotional rhetoric I would expect from a teenager.

You really can't see yourself, can you?
It's just Homer Simpson seeing Schwarzenegger's body with his head attached in the mirror forever.

Or we work it out from how you act.

Y'know, like you claim is how you determine if someone is worthy of respect.

Which you aren't.

You mean you leap to conclusions in service of narrow, arbitrary categories. If not "this," MUST be "that."

You don't get to lecture anyone about self-awareness.

There's Mister Liberty being all bossy-pants again.
Quelle surprise.

More like: If it walks like a cunt, talks like a cunt and has more jizz in it from hobos than a sock found behind Wal-Mart, it's Uncle Albert.

Who gives a fuck what you think? The people here bounce you around like a rubber ball because it's fun. They don't respect you or care about what you have to say beyond how it can be used to show just how fucking moronic you are, and you provide them ample material. They're not laughing with you, @Uncle Albert, they're laughing at you. You're not Clint Eastwood, you're Barney Fife.

Are you seriously try to tell me what I'm allowed and not allowed to say while whining about your free speech being attacked? Self awareness isn't exactly your strong suit, is it?

The call is coming from inside the house there, champ.



But back to your topic: Fuck your deluded self image. You can see whatever you want when you look in the mirror, but the rest of us that read your posts will continue to judge you based on the content of said posts.