Nope, she's perfectly health, shut up.

Not "with her," but she's probably great at making the trains run on time, which is what competent means.

Republicans haven't given a shit about women's health for the last twenty years, but suddenly now it's a big fucking issue?

“Antibiotics can take care of pneumonia. What’s the cure for an unhealthy penchant for privacy that repeatedly creates unnecessary problems?”

I like that the complaint about Clinton has shifted from her potentially being too free with information to being too private.

You know, given the grueling schedule and the close exposure to thousands of people that is a non-Trump Presidential campaign, you have to figure that just about every major Presidential candidate in recent history has kept minor illnesses on the campaign trail private. The only difference with Clinton is that there are hordes of lunatic conspiracy theorists obsessively poring over every minor detail of every appearance of hers, looking for anything that might seem not quite normal. Clinton is being held by the conspiracy theorists to a remarkably different standard than all other candidates have ever been held to, and the media is playing along with the conspiracy theorists.

Anyone who shook a thousand strangers' hands a day, kissed 50 babies a day, and did this for several months straight on three hours of sleep a night would probably come down with a cold, or a mild flu, or a walking pneumonia. The only thing this story about Clinton tells us is that she's a human being.

Yabbut, only if it's bacterial pneumonia.

She wasn't at all free with information. Instead of using the government's secure e-mail systems, she used her own private system (in a closet) to hide information from the public and from government investigators. She then destroyed that information when it was under subpoena, which is willful destruction of evidence.

She's been doing that kind of thing since the Rose Law Firm billing record days.

Just because they oppose abortion?

Actually her husband Bill Clinton was known for taking strong precautions against contracting anything via shaking so many strangers hands.

They can oppose abortion without actively trying to shut down women's health clinics and programmes which offer it as one of MANY treatments. And blocking "even if the health of the mother is in jeopardy" regs.

Trump supports Planned Parenthood. He supported it on the debate stage as Republican after Republican tried to tear him down. Hillary, on the other hand, would sign a total abortion ban if someone slipped her a $12 million donation.

More proof that Clinton has something other then pneumonia:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...eurological-test-collapsed-9-11-memorial.html

Yeah it's DailyMail but you can't argue with the pictures or video. And why won't Clinton's campaign identify who the woman is?

@Zombie, the explanation in your article about the woman's ID makes sense. I would actually like to see the campaign mount a rational response. #deflect

What's this I hear now that there are claims that Hillary has used a body double recently?

No, that's just her changing host bodies.

We don't know. What is it?

Link?

There is not "but" with the Mail. It's a tabloid. None of the media shows anything other than the stumble.

Her secrecy feeds the rumor mill. Trump has also been make big hay about the name calling of people who would vote for Trump. This does seem to be helping Trump's poll numbers so my advise to the SJW crowd is shut up with the name calling nonsense because it just pisses people off and alienates them further from you.

"Hillary is actually a Goa'uld" makes about as much sense as any of your other theories, I'll give you that.

It's a lie. She's not using one.

You can't argue with pictures and video of Clinton and that woman.

Nor can you argue with the fact that the campaign will not identify who she is and what her campaign job is. That doesn't pique your interest?

http://nypost.com/2016/09/12/clinton-skips-out-on-emergency-room-during-health-episode/

More cover up and lies.........

“As soon as she got into the vehicle, she was feeling fine.

Really? That's what they expect us to believe?

Wow.

The thing with calling everything a lie, is that at some point, you actually have to prove it.

By the way, that woman could be her doctor, a trusted advisor, or her lesbian lover for all I care. But until we hear otherwise from more reliable sources, you're just making shit up.

I think anyone with an ounce of common sense would know that there is no way in hell she was feeling fine after she got in that van.

And now we have CBS editing Bill Clinton's answer to a question about her health.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cbs-news-edits-out-embarrassing-verbal-slip-in-bill-clinton-interview/

So coverup and lies. With help from the media.

Man, that is one big ass conspiracy, Zombie!

Yes it is, and it's also very real.

Just a few days ago the mainstream press was running constant stories about her coughing fits, telling people to quit asking questions about Hillary's health. They said such questions were part of a stupid conspiracy theory and that Hillary was just fine. They were trying to suppress valid concerns.

Then the 9/11 collapse happened and they immediately spun it by saying she was just a little hot and faint because the day was so broiling hot. That was immediately shown to be a lie by all the people who'd been outside, and then shown to be a lie by Hillary herself when she re-emerged and declared the day "beautiful."

Then, after about 8 hours of lies from Hillary and the press about the collapse, her doctor admitted she just had pneumonia. That too is a lie of omission, because if an elderly woman collapses from pneumonia you rush her to the ER because death might be around the corner. You have to get X-rays of her lungs, measure her blood oxygen levels, and probably put her directly on oxygen as you wait for blood work and other tests.

They did none of that. They just drove her to an apartment, as if they knew pneumonia wasn't the underlying problem.

Clinton campaign delivers talking points to the press

Hillary Clinton wanted to “power through” her pneumonia, but after Sunday’s overheating episode, it “seems like the smart thing to do” to take some downtime, even though she is “raring to get back on the trail.”

Those phrases, projecting strength, prudence, and vigor, were among the six bullet-pointed talking points about Clinton’s health the campaign distributed to its army of outside surrogates Tuesday morning. The marching orders, part of the "Daily Message Guidance" from Brooklyn headquarters, instructed Clinton allies on how to answer questions about the Democratic nominee’s pneumonia and about how she dealt with the untimely setback.

The memo — which sought to underscore Clinton’s famous stamina and to argue she had been transparent about her health — was distributed a day after Clinton’s top campaign officials assured voters that the Democratic nominee had no undisclosed medical conditions, that she’d be back on the trail within the week, and that more medical records were forthcoming.​

She's been as transparent about her health as she has been on her Benghazi e-mails. It would take federal warrants and an army of NIH and CDC security people to get close to the truth.

Yes, she probably has pneumonia, but that has about as much to do with her collapse as a yeast infection or they'd have driven her straight to the ER. She also wasn't down by dehydration or she would've been feeling woozy hours earlier because it was a cool day with a nice breeze, so her hydration levels when she collapsed wouldn't have been much different from her levels when she showed up. And unless they were giving her IV fluids in the van, she did not "immediately feel better."

What her team is doing now is confirming that all they do is lie. A person whose primary instinct is cover-up and dishonesty cannot be an effective President once that's known. Nixon resigned because he got caught hiding the truth. Hillary is worse, and anyone would be an utter fool to vote for her - unless of course they're doing so because a Hillary Presidency assures the implosion of the Democratic party. Historically, the Republicans would have been far better off if McGovern had won in 1972. Then they wouldn't have taken the hit that a dishonest President brings.

it is possible to be both corrupt and competent - Nixon was