But now she's in the business of selling Chinese executives an audience with the president, using her established network. https://www.motherjones.com/politic...-chinese-execs-access-to-trump-at-mar-a-lago/ Putting all this together, it's possible we could find Trump connected to an international trafficking ring.
Future famous "Hollywood Madam" Heidi Fleiss once climbed on to President Reagan's lap. Nancy Reagan who was there joked that "its the most excited Ronnie's been in years".
I make no claims as to the veracity of the source as I know nothing about it. If it's accurate, things could get really uncomfortable for a lot of people.
Doesn’t sound like they are directly related, but: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattl...raid-prostitution-network-in-massage-parlors/
Are they talking about those jack shack review sites, like RubMaps, which literally anyone can access? Some very sophisticated police work, there.
He's been offered a plea deal. https://www.foxnews.com/us/patriots-owner-kraft-offered-plea-deal-in-florida-prostitution-case
Taking the plea deal involves taking a class on “the dangers of prostitution.” The fuck are those exactly?
So what happened with this? Turns out there was no other name. There was no "trafficking." They actually spent months specifically investigating trafficking for this case, using carefully installed hidden cameras and they could find no evidence of anything beyond pedestrian sex work. Even the 'bosses' were prostitutes, no Heidi Fleiss hollywood madams here. Maybe they got a money laundering charge or two, I don't recall. [main source has been Brown, at Reason] A big nothing story, wonder where the lie originated about all that other hyped up headlines and clickbait? Was it just to crowd out Smollet story (little did they know Jussie would find a way to lie his way to unpopularity and public disdain)? My guess would be shit journalism over lying or grandstanding prosecutors. Although these days everyone claims "trafficking" - maybe a cry for attention?
Lol imagine being so brain damaged from sucking my balls that you'd defend human trafficking. Like just last month @Paladin was defending the notion that modern slavery doesn't exist in the US, but when it's laid out in front of people, they turn a blind eye.
They’re going to release the video. https://abcnews.go.com/US/florida-p...surveillance-video-patriots/story?id=62461763
I wish they wouldn't. Why? Why is it important to release this tape to the public? Do we really need to see it happening? No. No we don't.
While I'd really rather not see a naked Robert Kraft, I'm all for laws that make public records available. Better than the other way around.
That's what I mean, though. Public record, I understand. News stations breathlessly talking about how they're obtaining a copy of the video, though, I mean seriously.
Video and audio recordings as well as photographs gathered by government agencies generally are public records.