Public Denied Access to Calendars of Elected Officials

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by KIRK1ADM, Jun 5, 2011.

  1. KIRK1ADM

    KIRK1ADM Bored Being

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,200
    Location:
    Calexico, Mexifornia
    Ratings:
    +3,798
    I can't say that I'm really all that interested in their day to day lives either. But, that doesn't mean they have the right to hide or for that matter deny those who pay their salaries access to that information.
  2. KIRK1ADM

    KIRK1ADM Bored Being

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,200
    Location:
    Calexico, Mexifornia
    Ratings:
    +3,798
    Not at all. I don't resent it in the least. Shove your lies, tales of fiction and the like up your ass.
  3. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    Ah. That's why you didn't bother mentioning as a comparator.
  4. KIRK1ADM

    KIRK1ADM Bored Being

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,200
    Location:
    Calexico, Mexifornia
    Ratings:
    +3,798
    One wasn't required. Well except for maybe you. :shrug: Now go kill yourself. Because you really are a lying sack of uselessness.
  5. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    I agree. Your bringing your experience of working in some small SoCal municipality is irrelevant to your topic, yet you did bring it into the discussion, then failed to understand the irony in my previous post.

    Of course, you've also failed to explain how merely having access to a public official's calendar will ensure the accuracy of that calendar. It's almost as if you've never heard of a business keeping two sets of books. :mystery: