Not drooling. It's just a fact. Her age and sickness along with this recent cancer is a big sign that the end is near. Unlike her previous cancer scares they reported this one as malignant. That's not good at all even though they say they removed all the cancer.
Yep. Acknowledging the truth does no one any harm. Edit: If she were a relative of mine, I'd be getting prepared for the end. I've seen similar situations before.
Neither does allowing child refugees to cross the border, but you were practically nutting yourself that they got thrown into cages. You don't exactly have a good read on what "harm" is.
If they cross the border illegally, they might die in desert areas. Or they may carry illnesses that could harm others. Or they may be accompanied by adults that have less than honorable intent... So, you're completely wrong about harm. And since you can't really dispute my statement, you resort to personal attack. We need a wall so the immigration process is orderly. Then no one will be put in "cages" because our border won't be overrun.
Make accommodations and you will eliminate a lot of abortions because you remove one of the big reasons people have them.
She’s still exercising on a regular basis, at least before getting hurt. She’s in better shape that many people half her age. She’s a bit like my great aunt, she’s in her 80s and still running a farm with her husband.
She’s not exercising. That’s a myth. She’s 85 and has osteoporosis. She’s not in better shape than people half her age.
Someone seems bothered his fantasy of her dying is being ruined by her being more healthy than he wishes.
My grandfather was about her age when he fractured his back and because of that they discovered the early cancer in his lung and removed it easily. He was healthy too. He also was all about exercising and keeping moving. There was all the right attitude and the best chances for his age. Because of being a bit weaker he fell and hit his head. Still things were going well and the doctors were telling him he was fine from the fall, and his loss of balance was just his age. Then finally after a while of increasing problems and the good doctors saying it was nothing bad they got them to scan his head and found the brain bleed. So they drilled in and let off the pressure and he was back on his feet again and ready to exercise. That is when the antibiotic resistant hospital sickness hit him. All those trips to the hospital and his weakened immune system from the doctor's mistakes made him easily susceptible to the hard core infections floating around US hospitals. I am not saying this is what will happen. However, with people her age this is how it starts. Even if you are healthy and try hard. It is a combination of a bunch of things that often takes the healthy people once something brings them to the hospital. I hope for the best for RBG, but the weakness is going to hit her in a number of ways and cause something else to happen. She may hold out, but two years can be a long time.
She's blessed that she lives in the USA and not, say, Britain where she'd be subject to NHS guidelines for cutoffs on available services for older citizens. I counted both my parents similarly blessed when they got government funded heart surgeries in their eighties. Academic questions: does anyone know if it's legal for Brits to buy their own private health care if they have the means, or whether NHS has separate set of rules for government employees like Justice Ginsberg that exempt them from the government "guidelines"?
Once the cancer gets into the lungs, you might as well update your will. No one I know with a diagnosis lasted more than a year. OTOH, if she dies in 2020, I hope the Dems pull teeth and refuse to hear any nominations Trump puts forth.
Who controlled the Senate when Garland was nominated? Who controls the Senate if Ginsburg leaves between now and 2020? So no it won’t work for the Democrats. Without control of the Senate they can not stop a SCOTUS nominee.
