Still think we shouldn't accept refugees?

But never actually communist so not second world according to the classic definition. There were never allies in the classical sense either. They just purchased their weapons from them.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34173139

Oh, and in an interesting twist of fate gulf Arab states attempted to justify them not taking in a single refugee/migrant by claiming they feared doing so would lead to terrorism.

Gee, maybe they know what they are talking about?

It is a much racker website but the event seems to be real.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...smash-urinate-on-virgin-mary-statue-in-italy/

Muslim migrants in Italy attack local man as he knelt down to pray in front of a statue of the Virgin Mary holding a picture of a loved one. The muslims not only beat the praying man but also destroyed the statue and urinated on it. We can look forward to much more of the same, no doubt.

Because the actions of a few are indicative of the behavior we can expect from all... I forgot the number... How many million refugees are you pronouncing guilty by association because of these fucktards in Italy?

It is a pervasive attitude in the Muslim world. Do all do it? No, but they do indeed widely teach that everyone else is inferior and that by right of religion they can do just about anything to the infidels.

That is a problem and it is not going to be with just a handful.

Well, I guess in your case, they might be right.

http://pamelageller.com/2015/08/italy-muslim-immigrants-gang.html/

That was from last month, also in Italy. The migrants beat and then gang raped the head of a reception center then destroyed the reception center burning it down.

Yes, there are a lot of criminals and just down right animals in these mobs.

Even if you want to accept the "migrants" would you at least agree some sort of review process is in order just to make sure they are actually Syrians or Iraqis and not, say, from some where else without any conflict? Right now they are not even doing that.

I few more things we can look forward to, vastly higher crime rates. Over 70% higher according to the official stats of the government of Denmark.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_crime

So..... taking in Somali immigrants is probably a bad idea?

Syeians are exactly the same as Somalians, yes?

It said Somalis have an especially high crime rate but mid easterners in general also have dramatically higher crime rates. There are a lot of people who are going to be victimized because of this.

Well the man should have known that Christians are not allowed to pray where Muslims can see it, nor are they allowed to sing loud enough for Muslims to hear it. There are rules that European Christians are simply going to have to observe or they will be killed.

So, seriously... you coming to ScareFest or not?

So @Dinner believes that certain ethnic groups are innately prone to criminal behavior. Fascinating.

The guys I know didn't have advanced degrees. They had associate degrees at best - but they were pretty smart. They learned English pretty quick though, only knowing Wolof and some French.

Nope.

No, I do not believe it is genetic in origin, Mrs. Troll. I do believe culture is a major factor in criminality or even if people think something is acceptable or not. Guess what? Not all cultures are equal.

Darn. Well, it's your loss.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34173252

Kosovars, Albanians, and Bosnians are getting in on Germany's open door policy. Just recently Germany finally started deporting people from the Balkans (20 years to late) saying the region is safe and they are all just economic migrants. Now, villages are emptying out as all of them pretend to be Syrians despite not speaking Arabic or being from a war zone. They are just economic migrants who see an opportunity in Merkel's foolishness.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/07/story-begins-to-unravel-about-drowned-syrian-boy/

Granted it is the daily caller which is partisan but more information is coming out about the family of the dead boy in the picture.

They had lived in relative safety in Turkey for three years and the father had a job in construction working six days a week for about $17 a day which would make him lower middle class in Turkey. Further more his sister, a refugee in Canada sent the family money each month (amount not specified but they did say it was enough to cover rent so about $200 a month). That means the family was making about $700 a month, a solidly middle class amount in Turkey, and were in no danger but they wanted to do economically better by migrating to Turkey where they would presumably sign up for welfare like the other 80% of muslims there.

Their Facebook page shows the family taking vacations to Istambul, feeding pigeons, and touring historical sites. So they weren't in any danger at all, had a middle class life style for Turkey, and really were nothing more than economic migrants. The grandfather of the dead boy said the plan was once the father made it to Germany he was supposed to find a way to bring over all of his extended family and several friends.

Yeah, I am not seeing how these people are anything other than economic migrants out to work the Welfare system in Germany.

For @Anna

So they had no security concerns and we're making about the median yearly income in Turkey with money for vacationing and sight seeing.

Not exactly the desperate refugee 14D was trying to paint in the OP.

For those of us who, unlike @Dinner, are not descended from royalty:

Oh, even better. All the money spent to get to Germany was given to the family by the father's father who is a well to do dentist in Damascus and the family is also originally from Damascus which is located far away from any fighting. Proof positive they are not refugees, never were, and instead are just economic migrants.

The vast majority of these people are not refugees but simple economic migrants seeking welfare and easy living in the west.

A.k.a. jobs. Unlike your royal ancestors.

So, seriously - Hanovers, Hapsburgs, Bourbons? Who are your people?

So... No comment about how your poster child "refugees" weren't actually refugees? Of course not. I was foolish to ever expect anything of substance out of you.

Were you under the impression that I started this thread, Your Royal Highness? Go grill another steak.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rian-boy-Aylan-Kurdi-wasn-t-real-refugee.html

Anyways, more information on the not even remotely a refugee boy which 14D and Co have turned into their mascot. Talk about manipulative liars.

I love how Dinner is embracing right-wing rags and shitty blogs he'd normally refuse to accept, because today they're telling him what he wants to hear.

I'm sure that drowned toddler was a real asshole, though.

No, he wasn't old enough to do anything like that. His dad though, his dad was willing to risk the lives of his family and trade a nice comfortable middle class life in Turkey, where his family had been safe for years, because he wanted free dental care and welfare in Germany.

He sure as hell wasn't a refugee or fleeing for his life. Not even remotely, and that is the fact you keep deliberately ignoring because it doesn't suit your desired narrative. Face it, you are either an emotional fool who got played or you are a deliberate liar. Which is it? Fool or liar?

What I found odd about the article, is that they showed many photos of the child. In each of them, he has the precise, same, frozen expression.