Super awesome fun Star Trek Into Darkness thread

Two words:

Chicken. Coop.

 

Given that Star Trek (2009) was awesome and Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) was even more awesomer, I expect the next official Star Trek movie to be the best film ever made.

Also, it will be so amazingly absolutely awesome that when it releases there will be mass fanboy suicides.

 

WAB's very accurate prediction just caused CaptainX to slit his wrists. Oh my!

 

Anytime you claim to be a good Christian or that you are "vastly superior" to anyone on here or in real life. The one true you have said though is "only fight those weaker than you".

 

Perhaps you could POST A LINK?

Thought not

 

A good Christian is not necessarily a good person by human standards.

A good Christian recognizes their sins and earnestly seeks forgiveness for them.

 

A bad Christian just beats his wife.

 

You attempt to justify yours by claiming that you can't control how others will react to what you do or say. Or by saying that you will use rules to cause others harm.

 

Prison sex.

 

Why yes I can. I admit the source is a little unreliable, but as the person in question he confirms all the major points of the charge only quibbling about a few of the details.

http://www.wordforge.net/showpost.php?p=2436075&postcount=82

 

Not a chicken coop.

As you can you clearly, you are the one who is a liar.

From the post in question.

Making a handful of mistakes about issue numbers of old magazines is not lying.

and not a "chicken coop" Ancalagon above simply made that up.

My parents raised broiler chickens for 30 years. In broiler houses (roughly 100 meters long). After they retired I stored a large number of boxes of old magazines in them. Hardly a "chicken coop"

See links for differences.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broiler#Rearing_House

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_coop

 

You really can't resist can you? You just can't stop digging.

Seriously dude, when all you can do is quibble about the details, you should probably just walk away from the thread.

THIS:

Back in the day Dayton couldn't figure out how to post links. After enough time people in TNZ quit falling for his trolls and refused to discuss anything with him until he start backing it up. Even though he still couldn't figure out to post links, lucky for Dayton he had 'years worth' of US News and World Reports in his fathers chicken house. After repeatedly being called out, he started posting block quotes from the house. When asked for specifics he'd even post the issue and date. This worked for a while until someone in TNZ who had access to the entire US News and World Report catalogue through their library system actually looked it up.

Dayton was lying the whole time. Just making up quotes to get out of posting links. When called out he just retreated to how stupid it was to always be asked to back up his arguments with links.

He's been a lying troll for a while in other words.

is in no appreciable way any different from this:

Back in the day Dayton couldn't figure out how to post links. After enough time people in TNZ quit falling for his trolls and refused to discuss anything with him until he start backing it up. Even though he still couldn't figure out to post links, lucky for Dayton he had 'years worth' of US News and World Reports in his fathers chicken coop. After repeatedly being called out, he started posting block quotes from the coop. When asked for specifics he'd even post the issue and date. This worked for a while until someone in TNZ who had access to the entire US News and World Report catalogue through their library system actually looked it up.

Dayton was lying the whole time. Just making up quotes to get out of posting links. When called out he just retreated to how stupid it was to always be asked to back up his arguments with links.

He's been a lying troll for a while in other words.

 

Odd that you neglected to print the truth.

I never made up quotes. Did I get issue numbers of magazines wrong? Certainly. But not having an flawless photographic memory of what one reads is not lying.

I read something and think it is interesting. A few years later something comes up that what I read if applicable and relevant to.

Am I supposed to just ignore what I've read because I don't have the exact date or issue number of a source?

I'll admit, I did find it annoying and even galling that the ONLY source most people accepted for online debates were links to online sources.

 

Shut up you stupid liar.

 

Why do you bother when you have no power at all to enforce that?

Meaningless from a complete internet nonentity.

 

Yes, yes you are quite indeed. That is what we have been stating you are for nearly 14-15 years.

The only "evidence" you had to back you up was the chicken coop. And the issue remains, you are the only one that infers the conclusions you do from your links. And when others post links you dismiss them as irrelevant or consider them to be incorrect when they consistently prove you wrong.

 

Prove it.

Case closed.

Dickhead.

 

What differentiates an internet entity from a nonentity? Which are you?

 

Given that everyone here knows a whole range of true information about me (including where I live and what I and my family look like) then I consider myself an "entity".

And given that people here repeatedly refer to real facts about me.

That is, I'm not just an unknown person hiding behind an avatar.

 

Says the guy who posts his entire life on the internet in the hope that one of those non-entities thinks he's a genius.

By the way Dayton, did you say that you didn't like using abusive insults?

 

Most of the people here are actually known to each other. They simple choose not to reveal themselves to you since you are a loathsome, untrustworthy and dangerous cretin.

 

Retaliation is allowed by myself.

I do not begin the name calling as you are well aware.

At any rate it is not for you to impose any standards upon me.

 

and if anyone tries to deny you the last word, you'll hit them?

 

Canneloni.

 

The same goes for you.

 

If that's true, then you can't impose or attempt to impose your standards of marriage or homosexuality on others.

 

Wow. For a thread about the greatest Trek movie ever made, this sure turned into a "hate Dayton" thread real fast.

 

It is not my standards I wish to impose.

 

I bet Osama Bin Laden said the same thing.