They should've have neither at either point. This backs up what I've long maintained. That as loathsome as President Donald Trump is, the extremes that people who want to take him down are willing to go to far outweighs the downside of leaving him in power.
Yeah, I don't get it. Liberal Media reports Mueller properly handling the situation. This is supposed to be a smoking gun?
That is what I don't get about this right wing talking point. One of dozens of investigators showed he had questionable objectivity... And then Mueller fired him for it. Obviously, Mueller is biased?
Well, normally, I'd suggest that we should simply just let the FBI redo the investigation of Hillary with different people, but considering that Trump has been trashing the FBI on Twitter, it might be kind of difficult to find agents who could be objective on the matter....
That is because trump makes him look good. That is hard to do considering he let 3000 plus civilians die in the worst terrorist attack on domestic soil within his first year, tanked the booming economy, was the biggest government idiot since Quayle, and disgraced the us worldwide. Aside from 9/11 trump has surpassed him in every way.
President Bush "let 3,000 plus civilians die"?!?!? I didn't realize you were a "9-11 truther". And the U.S. economy entered a brief, one quarter downturn after the 9-11 attack and then grew steadily until late in 2007. Not sure by what metric you claim that President Bush was an "idiot" or "disgraced the U.S.".
Yup, 9/11 happened on his watch. I guess that makes me a truther as charged. Are you trying to imply it didn't happen? I am pretty sure the two huge world trade centers are no longer there and I can assure you there was a giant hole and a huge smoke cloud on the day they claim they fell. I also think there are videos, witnesses, rubble, ldead people, people with health problems, and even president bush claims it happened. You need to join reality
The planning and plotting for the 9-11 attacks began before President Bush even took office. As president there was little he could've done based on the information available prior to the attacks to have prevented them. The "on his watch" argument is one of the most monumentally stupid ones that people make regarding presidents. The president is not like the captain of a ship at sea with 300 people under his command. He is leader of a nation with a third of a billion people and some 4 million under his direct control.
Information like the PDB that was titled "Bin Laden Determined Strike Within US. Plans To Use Airplanes As Missles." more than a month in advance?
I've seen that. It wasn't actionable. Based on that what was the Bush Admin. supposed to do? They might as well have a report that "Bin Laden Would Like to Detonate a Nuclear Weapon in American City". Terrorist attacks without successful precedents are very difficult to seriously plan for.
You are a republican apologist. Bush could have been flying the planes into the towers and you would blame Obama. Thanks for being a liar.