Is this garamet's dumbest statement... EVAR?

That was NOT an attempt at failed sarcasm. We know you better than that.

That was a blatant disregard for the fact that Iraq invaded a soverign neighboring country and an attempt to pin the consequences for THEIR actions on our military.

Try again.

Well we did go there earlier and fuck up a buncha stuff, right?!

Unbelievable.

So nothing was happening in Iraq back in 1991?

garamet has never taken money for sex.

apostle83's girlfriend has (we assume) never taken money for sex.

apostle83 says garamet is a whore.

Therefore...

Therefor, Garamet is a slut.

Apostle doesn't have a girlfriend. Rework that.

Thank you, Miss Cleo.

Let me guess. Wordforge is going to attempt to turn this into another 47-page "We know what garamet REALLY meant to say!" isn't it?

You guys managed a whole week without trolling me, and you're to be commended for that.

But you can hunker down in your own little corner of the schoolyard and play with each other this time around.

No. It was all happening in Kuwait.

Nobody is trolling you. We would have preferred you stayed out of this thread.

Oh.

What did you really meant to say?

Wait a minute....now people are making threads over supposed dumb statements?????

I think we will need a whole forum for that.

The Baba Room?

Have you seen the trailer for 88 Minutes? The part where Pacino's yelling "Did I blow up my car? Did I shoot bullets at myself?"

Either Tamar and Sokar and apostle are going to argue that Saddam bombed *himself* in 1991, or they don't know what "infrastructure" means.

Someone's gonna haul out the "He killed x-million of his own people and there are mass graves and and and..."

WHICH, JUST TO BE CLEAR, I AM NOT DISPUTING.

But that wasn't what I was talking about yesterday.

BY "INFRASTRUCTURE," I SPECIFICALLY MEANT THE THINGS, NOT THE PEOPLE, THAT WERE DESTROYED BY THE U.S. BOMBING CAMPAIGN IN JANUARY 1991.

Now, let's see how many ways they can spin it. The grownups have better things to do.

Edit: Sorry to shout, MAoHS. You and I were apparently posting simultaneously.

I guess it's safe to say you failed English, amirite?

DUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRR!

You stupid dumbass. You start a thread with her name in it and expect her to stay out?

D'oh.

Most people will go into a thread with their name on it. Even if it's started by a 'tard.

Jeez.

Garamet, you owe me a Tylenol 3 for the worsening of my headache from seeing that damned red font.

No, by now Garamet should know to stay out of all threads, especially the ones with her name on them.

^ Ladykiller up there seems to think he matters in any way.

Well, which is it? 1991 or 1999?

1991. I specifically said "January 1991." Go back and read the other thread.

But here, whore, you said 1999.

Looks like a simple typo to me.

I was too busy trying to get the size and color right. It is a typo. Funny apostle didn't notice the other two instances where I said "1991."

But, of course, we know apostle never makes typos.

Did he ever cite the actual article, or did he just start the thread and then abandon it?

Anyway, I've edited it so there'll be no further confusion.

I made a mistake and I corrected it. Everybody write that down, mmkay? Bookmark it while you're at it.

Yeah. I thought she meant 1998.

You were obviously too busy posting that letter from Wired.

What a FAIL of a dodge. It shows your whorish nature.

I'll take that as a "no."

[-]Do you know how stupid you sound when your only insult is "whore"?[/-]

Strike that. Of course not.

Retards like you make everyone who has a legit problem with Garamet look bad.

^Let him be. He's doing what he does best.

I'm betting there wasn't even any such letter in Wired.

Fuck off, whore.