That's about a ten-thousandth as bad as what Hillary did, which was so illegal that it requires immediate revocation of her security clearance, along with her staff, firings, and jail time.
Anybody else would already be in jail. A security breach is a very, very serious thing. Worse, the intelligence people think the Chinese used her unsecured e-mail system for phishing attacks against other top government officials, and are saying that pretty much every e-mail sent at the highest levels has been read by them for the past several years. Kerry has come out and said that all his e-mail communications were compromised. Thanks Hillary! Worse yet, if she's elected then one or several foreign governments hostile to the US could blackmail her by threatening to release the e-mails she withheld. She's backed herself into a corner and there's no way out.
I can't find an image macro that adequately expresses just how incredibly stupid and dishonest your every post is, so this will simply have to do for now... ALL GTURNER POSTS IN IMAGE FORM
I guess you haven't been reading the papers. From the Observer The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton: Special Prosecutor Needed Now Hillary finally hands over her server—after it's been professionally wiped clean After years of holding herself above the law, telling lie after lie, and months of flat-out obstruction, HIllary Clinton has finally produced to the FBI her server and three thumb drives. Apparently, the server has been professionally wiped clean of any useable information, and the thumb drives contain only what she selectively culled. Myriad criminal offenses apply to this conduct. Anyone with knowledge of government workings has known from inception that Hillary’s communications necessarily would contain classified and national security related information. Thanks to the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community, it is now beyond dispute that she had ultra-Top Secret information and more that should never have left the State Department. Equal to Ms. Clinton’s outrageous misconduct is that of the entire federal law enforcement community. It has long chosen to be deliberately blind to these flagrant infractions of laws designed to protect national security—laws for which other people, even reporters, have endured atrocious investigations, prosecutions, and some served years in prison for comparatively minor infractions. During the same years that Hillary was communicating about national security and world affairs off the grid, the Department of Justice has had no qualms threatening news reporters and prosecuting whistleblowers under the Espionage Act. It’s high time for a special prosecutor to be named to conduct a full investigation into Ms. Clinton’s likely commission of multiple felonies, including a conspiracy with Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and possibly others, to violate multiple laws. While the FBI and Department of Justice have willfully ignored Hillary Clinton’s outrageous conduct, they didn’t hesitate a minute to investigate and prosecute former CIA Director and national hero, General Petraeus. He was just tarred, feathered and ridden out of the CIA on a rail for sharing some information (his own notebook) with his biographer who was both in the military and had a top secret clearance. Yet, Petraeus did not have a secret server set up to house his classified and top secret information or digital satellite imagery; he destroyed nothing; and, there was no “leak.” But that’s not all. During the same years that Hillary was communicating about national security and world affairs off the grid, the Department of Justice has had no qualms threatening news reporters and prosecuting whistleblowers under the Espionage Act. To hell with the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent, even the New York Times reported that this administration prosecuted more reporters and whistleblowers for “espionage” than all prior administrations put together. Remember Fox news reporter James Rosen? The Holder Justice Department not only seized his emails immediately and without his knowledge, they suggested he was a criminal “co-conspirator” in a leak case—under the Espionage Act—which carries a ten-year term of imprisonment. And they quickly indicted former House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senator Menendez on extremely stretched or tortured views of vague criminal statutes and factual allegations of conduct that may well not be criminal. Senator Menendez can’t vacation with his best friend but Hillary Clinton and her “Foundation” can accept millions of dollars from foreign governments seeking to curry her favor. Yet there’s been no criminal investigation of Ms. Clinton and her cabal? They couldn’t seize her server months ago while it contained all the emails? They couldn’t put a stop to it from the beginning? It goes on into detail about her flagrant violations of the Espionage Act. That's the kind of thing being printed in the papers these days.
Oh, I've been reading the papers, but for actual news, rather than opinion pieces by someone with close ties to Charles Koch's Cato Institute.
Yeah. It's all LIES from the evil Koch Brothers - who are social liberals. Everyone I know who was in intelligence would just choke her out or shoot her.
Probably why I never claimed they were Ultra-Conservative, or some such along those lines, eh Georgie? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggggggghhhht! Sure they would.
Yeah. I know people who were in intelligence. I chat every day with a friend who worked at Fort Meade. One of my other chat buddies (who could've been an Air Force runway model) was in counter terrorism in the field, hunted Bosnian war criminals (and had dinner with one with nothing but a pistol in her waistband) and eventually ended up being flown between DC and Crawford Texas all the time. She was an adrenaline junkie. She dealt with a lot of very sadistic trainers, such as a guy who taught defensive driving (as in don't get boxed in by foreign operatives with AK-47's and RPGs). He didn't think he was doing his job unless everyone was bleeding or having a nervous breakdown.
Sorry, but I do chat daily with Intel people. The hot blonde was mostly a mil blogger, but was also a sex blogger, and I feel guilty to this day because our chats led her to doing some very dicey things. She'd earlier had meet ups with some guy who works for Treasury who had been a recurring thug stand-in on America's Most Wanted. He raped her (which is what she was there for) but got too rough and tried to ass rape her so she elbowed him in the face. He kidney punched her (and he was a huge, huge guy), and went ahead and ass raped her. I ended up writing a really interesting thesis on the evolutionary biology of the origins of extreme sex, which circulated around the S&M forums for some time. It's actually pretty fascinating because a lot of the traits we associate with males in other contexts, such as religious devotion, probably came from genes being selected for by women whose villages got sacked. Surviving the sack of a village for a hot girl requires an Oscar winning performance, having their world destroyed in an afternoon and having to pick the best mate out of a bunch of males who should all have been shot in the head. For a 19 to 29 year old to work their way up to Achilles after seeing their friends and family die spells the difference between being a piece of trash refugee and being queen of a major empire. But humans are very good lie detectors and so the best way for evolution to accomplish this is to get girls turned on by some male behaviors that modern feminists all condemn, and behaviors that generally result in death or prison once we became civilized. It's complicated, and it's dark.
Sorry George, but you're such a lying sack of shit, that if you said the sky was blue, I'd feel the need to check, rather than ever take you at your word. You may indeed know people who used to be in the intelligence community, but you'll likely never convince anyone here of the fact, because you've established such a reputation for blatant dishonesty.
A vote for Jeb is a vote for torture http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...by-government/article25964530/?service=mobile
Democrats for Gore http://tbo.com/ap/report-democrats-...ocial&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=buffer
3.3% would vote for him! But 18.8% would vote for Bill Clinton. Seems some people aren't clear on the 22nd amendment.
Majority of Americans back criminal probe of Hillary's e-mails That will keep getting worse because she continues to lie, evade, and destroy evidence, while the national security apparatus needs to know what information was compromised.
The man who's done his damnedest as governor to dismantle the State of Wisconsin? Of course you are. The sooner the U.S. is destroyed, the closer the End Times. But you still need to rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem. Better get busy.
What has Walker done to hurt Wisconsin? Aside from bringing the public employees unions to heel (which shouldn't even exist anyway). And prattle about this end times stuff that few Christians have any knowledge of much less believe in. You sure are big on promoting your biases and stereotypes as facts garamet.
Oh, gosh. Slashed funding for education, among other things, which would have put you on the unemployment line. Except that he slashed unemployment benefits, too.
Really? I'm just guessing here but I would suggest that even with those cuts Wisconsin's per capita spending on education and unemployment is considerably above that of Arkansas. In addition, I thought those education cuts were for higher education (college level) and I'm on record that too many Americans go to college anyway.
With Arkansas among the 10 worst states for education, you're absolutely right. Let's drag every other state toward the bottom so Dayton won't feel bad. The Dayton Kitchens Presidential Platform: Here's to the dumbing-down of all Americans!
Are you suggesting Americans can't be educated without spending of a certain level? That is a very, very narrow view of what constitutes education As for Arkansas being among the 10 worst states for education......this is 2015 garamet. Not 1985.
I'm saying "results." History teachers who are ignorant of history, for example, are a disservice to their students. The system could pay you 3x what they're paying you and you'd still be a slacker counting the days until the end of the semester.
And yet it's still one of the ten worst. And that's a conservative outfit's ranking, so you can dispense with any claim of bias against red states.
Increased spending on education doesn't insure success (it depends on what the money is spent on) but a lack of spending does insure failure.