Good luck with that. Politics corrupts everyone. By your logic, once someone wins political office they should immediately be killed. Not going to happen.
Hillary is more corrupt than a typical politician by several orders of magnitude. That's why the FBI agents regard her as "Satan incarnate". She is the rot that must be rooted out if the Republic and the rule of law is to survive. If necessary, millions of people may have to die to make that happen, but it will have to happen.
Riiiight. That's why 2 decades of investigations have failed to turn up any evidence that could put her in jail. Well, that explains everything. The FBI is looking for Satan, who's a myth, when instead they should be looking for lizard aliens, because those are totally real, and Hillary's one of them. Amirite? Or to put it another way, "We must burn the village in order to save it." On the off-chance that anybody here was laboring under the delusion that gtardo had the moral high ground, this ought to disabuse you of that fact. Killing millions of people to bring down one politician isn't exactly what one would call an "ideal solution," or even an acceptable one, at that.
Actually almost every investigation turned up plenty of evidence to put her in jail, but politicians and prosecutors balked because there is absolutely no precedent to putting a First Lady in prison while her husband is still running the country. It would horribly diminish respect abroad and completely damage the President's freedom of action and image, and thus the image of the United States. So Hillary kept escaping prosecution for felony after felony. As just one minor example, in her sworn testimony to Congress she committed perjury, over and over again. She also repeatedly lied under oath to Federal investigators. Anyone else would already be in jail. Remember what happened to Scooter Libby for failed recollection? We may be left with no other alternative. She must be executed by lethal injection, die in prison, or blow her brains out in the White House situation room as her last defenders tell her it's over, Americans have the building surrounded, and she lost.
Did she perjure herself? Why yes, she did. She said she never sent or received any classified materials on her private system. She lied. The FBI confirmed she lied. That is perjury. She said she only used one device, a Blackberry, for all her communications. She used dozens of different devices. She lied. That is perjury. She said she turned over all work-related e-mails to the State Department. She didn't. The FBI confirmed she didn't. She lied. That is perjury. And she mishandled classified information, which carries a ten year jail penalty per offence, and ordered her underlings to likewise mishandle classified information. And she'll likely be indicted by the FBI for public corruption for her Clinton Foundation activities.
What do you know about Assange? Why do you blindly trust foreign individuals? Why do you believe this is some super do-gooder who would throw away his life doing good instead of someone who has been compromised and blackmailed into doing what he is doing? Same thing happened to Anonymous. Anonymous, a ragtag group of super hackers who are out to expose the truth and anyone can just put on a Guy Fawkes mask on and be an official Anonymous spokesperson. Now who puts on the Guy Fawkes mask praising Vladimir Putin and threatens if Trump isnt elected WW3 will start? Oh you say they dont want Hillary? They why didnt they say if Hillary is elected? If Johnson or Stien is elected WW3 starts as well? Mark my words, you guys royally fucked up nominating this guy who shovels coal into your hate oven and if he gets elected you will see the door open from the Trojan horses belly and the real intentions emerge and its going to be ugly for all of us.
Look the site has a story about German soldiers from WW1 trash talking our troops from WW1. Nice site you quote.
He wont address that and if anyone questions him on it they will be detained. Thats how dictators operate.
As do lots of people. Most of them never see jail time. Mark Fuhrman committed perjury in the OJ trial. How much jail time did he serve? And? You keep harping on this like it's something significant. Essentially, you can commit perjury and not have to suffer the consequences for it no matter who you are. What on earth makes you think that a powerful politician is going to be held to a higher standard than you or I? If you'd been paying attention, you'd know that she's more likely to get a medal than a prison term for such things. There's a slight chance that one of her underlings might be charged, but that'd be pretty unusual. Generally, you only get charged with such things if you're someone like Snowden or Manning and do it without permission of your superior. Riiiiiiiight. Keep telling yourself that. Even if Trump wins, all of this will quickly be forgotten. Hillary's rich, so she get's a pass so long as she doesn't steal from other rich people.
I really don't understand how it is that people fail to get this point. Sure, g'tardo doesn't get it because of some phenomenally motivated reasoning, but there are a lot of otherwise seemingly sensible people who think Clinton is particularly corrupt or dishonest despite two-and-a-half decades of constant investigation of everything she does turning up nothing worse than the fact that she took the same technically improper shortcut everyone else in a similar position took to do her job. The email "scandal" is like finding out that Hillary drove 80 in a 65 MPH zone once when she was late for work, and that's the only "scandal" where it's actually been shown that she did something improper. There's worse that comes out about Trump on a quarter-hourly basis than has ever come out about Clinton.
Then what's going to happen is that Republicans are just going to murder all the Democrat politicians. Will they go to jail for it? Of course not, because laws no longer apply to politicians because Democrats insist that laws don't apply to politicians. Now why did Scooter Libby go to jail? Why did CIA Director David Petraeus resign within three days of the DNI finding out about his mishandling of classified information, why did he plead guilty, and why did the FBI recommend felony prosecution? Why did he get two years and a $100,000 fine, since what he did was nothing compared to willfully opening the conduct of almost the entire State Department to foreign hackers? A Navy machinist mate was just sentenced to a year in jail (he was facing 5 to 6 years) for taking two photos of his submarine's reactor compartment so he could show his family where he works. Why did CIA Director John Deutch have to get a Presidential pardon for having a classified file on his home computer? Hillary had a server with hundreds of classified files. Why did a State Department employee get sentenced to a year in jail for taking a memory device home with classified information on it? Under no standard of justice should Hillary escape prison for any of the many, many felonies she has committed. But she went far beyond these other cases where people went to prison. She not only mishandled classified information, she lied to investigators, lied to Congress, destroyed the evidence, and obstructed justice. And what she did is far worse than just destruction of evidence. What she destroyed was key to figuring out what foreign intelligence agencies may have accessed. We can't know the extent of the damage she caused because she destroyed the information needed by our own side to assess what programs have been compromised. For that alone she should get life in prison.
There will be enough evidence to charge her. Especially when people start flipping because they don't want to face a decade or more in prison for her. And if you think the Democrats won't do what the Republicans did to Nixon I got some bad news for you: #1 Most Democrats in the House and Senate despise Hillary Clinton #2 Most Democrats facing the facts of her corruption will find it far easier to go to her and tell her she has to resign or they will side with the Republicans and remove her from office then to face the voters wrath. The Democrats will be looking out for themselves and then the party. Hillary will be a distant third on the care list. #3 The majority of the media may be on the lefts side but they've got no real love for Hillary. They would dump her as fast as they did in 2008 when they ran to Obama's side. In fact right now your starting to see cracks in the media where even they can't keep a straight face when talking about Hillary. #4 Democrats would have no problem going to Kaine as POTUS. If he can pick up a VP that everyone on the left likes they may even feel that they've got a chance to win in 2020. So maybe she does serve a full term but it's far from certain. Republicans certainly do not need to dominate anything as they will likely have Democrat help in bouncing her if push comes to shoving out the door.
Read this, its real good https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilve...rump-misinfo?utm_term=.eoZ1vZoLkG#.cmp8k6WXbJ
I'll take all that seriously when they start telling us about their investigation into the amateurish corruption in the Trump Foundation. Not that I much care if she's charged. But it would be nice if the FBI had a non-partisan interest in scandal.
Why would the FBI care about the Trump Foundation compared to having Hillary catastrophically damage US national security for profit?
Yes....yes.... we get it.... you don't care...... Even though you post obsessively on the subject like the rest of us.....
and an equivilant number of years of showboating GOP congressmen wasting tens of millions trying to be the white knight who brings her down.
I post obsessively about how monstrously awful Trump is, I post about Clinton only to the extent that I choose to dispute utter bullshit that's easily refuted by information in the public record, or to mock people that think trivial things amount to "Crime Family" But if I need to write it in crayon for you, then once more: I am as desperately passionate that Trump lose as anyone you'll ever come in contact with, if that results in, by default, saying "Clinton is just an ordinary corrupt politician, not a diabolical Bond villain" then sure, whatever. But don't mistake my obsession with Trump's loss as some misapprehension that Hillary is the transcendent savior of the 21st century.
the nightmare in our future is if the GOP comes up with a guy who pushes the same buttons Trump does without being a fucking narcissistic idiot - hell even Donald Jr might be enough.
and then closing up the great majority of early voting sites used predominantly by blacks - total coincidence of course. Very unfortunate those mostly Democrats now fine themselves in 4 hour lines! Sad!
Here's a guy who gleefully cites the idea that the FBI thinks she is "Satan incarnate" while at the same time being completely convinced that the entirely unbiased and neutral paragon of justice which is the FBI will do it's job in an honorable fashion and reach fair conclusions...and sees no contradiction in that.
sooooooo.... They had tons of evidence while Bill was in office but choose to do nothing so as not to hurt his work as president.... BUT once Bill left office they were so busy dusting the lamps for 8 years that they never got around to doing anything at all about it, including undermining her election to the senate... AND couldn't be bothered to produce evidence which would convince congressional Republicans to not approve her appointment to SoS because they were busy tying their shoes at the time... BUT Now that she's on the verge of actually becoming president herself, they will surely completely ignore the choice they made when her hubby was president and boldly waltz into the Oval Office and perp walk her out??? I guess you must be going for comedy or something here but, frankly, you have no real talent.
Any time you are dealing in fake goods, or total bullshit, and seeking to make money, what is the one indefensible item you need? A GULLIBLE MARK!!!! Trump voters are the largest motherload of those in the history of ever. gturner pretty much has to laugh off this story, because he'd lose 3/4 of his bookmarks if he took it seriously.