I'm pretty sure I've explained it before. I want 7.0 A1c level in my blood. elective abortions a memory The Patriots receiving the Lombardi Trophy. The Cowboys making the playoffs. The 7th Fleet in the South China Sea. The Russians in only their country. A Unified Korea with its capital in Seoul. Bashir Assad and Kim Jong in hell. People in church three times a week. The Dierks Outlaws in War Memorial Stadium in December. My retirement fund bringing in 7% annual returns. Plenty of dried, bailed hay in the barns. Star Trek on network television every year. Star Trek on the big screen every other Christmas. Honor Harrington on the small screen. sexual deviants in the closet. Sci Fi Universe, International Combat Arms, Science Digest on the newsstands Transformers returning to sanity. Really cool Battletech TROs B-1B bombers hitting targets on three continents. Lorraine Bartlett writing some decent Booktown mysteries. Decent places to buy books and magazines everywhere. A brand new nuclear powerplant beginning operation every year. U.S. astronauts on Mars. U.S. unmanned probes orbiting the outer planets. Cows grazing in the meadows. Ships of the U.S. 5th fleet patrolling the Persian Gulf. A Bush in the White House NATO in Eastern Europe new Ford pickup in my driveway Illegal aliens staying in Mexico presents under the Christmas Tree A big fire in the fireplace in January Liam Neeson in a thriller Harrison Ford in a space opera white Christmas only in the movies Arkansas Razorbacks in a News Years Day Bowl God in heaven updated to include stuff from my other list. How is that? For starters.
You want multiple wars, meaning potentially millions dead. And you want a fucking theocracy with backstreet abortions and homosexuals suffering oppression. Amongst other banalities and weirdness. Fuck you.
I said nothing about multiple wars or even one war for that matter. The only combat I mentioned involved the B-1 bombers and the occasional bombings doesn't indicate a major war necessarily. Die in a fire Henryhill.
Well, that's a very bizarre list to say the least. Putting aside all the sports and entertainment stuff, you're basically calling for a dynastic White House, a greater role for the US and NATO as world police (in direct contradiction to your previously stated isolationist views), open aerial warfare (for what reason exactly?), no immigration, forced international exclusion for other nations and religious authoritarianism that shuts down freedom of expression. What are the benefits of these things? Also, how do you define a "sexual deviant"?
Sex outside of marriage between one man and one woman. And when did I ever state "isolationist views"? You sure that wasn't someone else. ? In regards to the "dynastic White House" I guess you are referring to my "Bush in the White House" in the list. I've made no secret of my admiration for the Bush family and I how believe they are an example of how multi generational wealthy families should conduct themselves. I said nothing about "no immigration". I referred specifically to "illegal immigrants". Don't know why intelligent people can't see the distinction.
So you're saying I am a sexual deviant and I should be oppressed? No, it was you. You said international laws and treaties were irrelevant. By starting wars based on the most tenuous of reasons? Oh I know the distinction. What you don't seem to know is that not every "illegal" immigrant starts out as an illegal immigrant and vice versa. Your comment was simplistic. What your desires for oppressing other nations and pointless aerial bombing runs. What are the benefits of those?
What I don't get is what does it do for you to have deviants in the closet. Are you really that dependent on denial for your own happiness?
That he doesn't give one is revealing, don't you think? He just likes blowing brown people up. Although he did list several other items that would require major wars to accomplish.
Sex outside of marriage between one man and one woman is a perversion. At least having the decency to keep it out of public attention is not oppression. It is simple courtesy to basic morals. International laws and treaties I consider irrelevant if they attempt to impose any restriction upon the actions of the United States. Remember that the sovereignty of the United States trumps (no pun) that of any other nation on Earth due to the indispensable nature of this country. Refer to the article by noted historian Niall Ferguson on the indispensability of the United States to the rest of the world in a lengthy article in Foreign Policy magazine a few years back called "A World Without Power" I think it was called. foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/27/a-world-without-power/ I said nothing about "oppressing other nations". In regards to "aerial bombing" I assume you mean my comments on B-1Bs. The B-1 has been arguably my favorite aircraft since the mid 1970s when the first prototypes flew. And I enjoy seeing them used in action. In our modern world, there are always worthy targets of their attention.
Here you go with this nonsense about morality again. Marriage as a concept is less than 5,000 years old. Christian marriage is obviously considerably less. Humanity is 200,000 years old. Are you arguing that for 195,000 years human beings were immoral? Plus, you never answered my question (surprise). Are you calling me a sexual deviant? How insufferably arrogant. The world was doing just fine without your "indispensable" nation for thousands upon thousands of years. What makes the US indispensable? And no, US sovereignty doesn't trump that of other nations one bit - that is unless you are arguing that human beings who are not American are by default inferior. Is that what you are claiming? No interest to read that yet again. It's the only article you ever produce and it is only an opinion piece. I am asking you, not Nail Ferguson. And by the way, Ferguson doesn't claim American sovereignty trumps that of other nations, so poor example anyway. Yes you did. You said Russia should be locked within it's borders. So people should die because you like to see a plane in action???? You utter scumbag. And you wonder why people say you have a war fetish? Disgraceful.
The answer to the bombing campaign is just stunning. How he can claim not to have a war fetish is beyond me.
Of course. I thought that was obvious. I hope it doesn't offend you but then again, hard truths often do. I don't take much offense at your claim that I have a "war fetish". As I don't. I only advocate bombing people that are bad ones. Such as ISIS, targets belonging to the Assad govt. in Syria, things like that.
Of course it offends me. It's not just me is it? You're insulting 90% of the board. When you were accepting gifts and well wishes from us all, why didn't you refuse them on the basis we are all immoral deviants? Where was your superior morality then? Plus, you yet again avoided a key question. Were humans deviants for 195,000 years before the invention of marriage? Are you are you once again being a intellectual coward by running away from the tough questions? You wanted to see people die because you like seeing planes in action. You couldn't even say who until pressed repeatedly. Your primary concern was seeing weapons in action, not whether or not they were needed. That is unquestionably a war fetish. It is also a callous disregard for human life. Also, I notice you avoided answering my other questions, so I'll ask again. Are non Americans an inferior race of humans? Yes or no?