Nobody treated it as such. Only in respect of the school public records. That's why, quite correctly, warnings for the initial reveal would not have been justified. The position of the mods has now been taken and there is clarity on the issue (subject to my question just above).
Clarification question gul. If I insist that I am a great teacher, highly competent or whatever in the future, does that mean that people still cannot reference the incident in question?
So totally unrelated to any poster here I would just like to mention that a friend of mine does substitute work and the money is halfway decent for how little is expected out of him. They really are just glorified baby seaters so that might be a good way to make extra cash if anyone is wondering. Just FYI without any personal information or anything.
I suspect the answer to that is yes, but what would it say about you promoting a potential falsehood when we already know the truth?
Damned if we do and damned if we don't. Seriously? You were threatening to quit not even a week ago over the report button shit because we were picking on him and trying to drive him away or some other bollocks you pulled out your ass. You can't have it both ways.
Yeah, I'll remember this the next time you want to pile on the man yourself. You can't have it both ways either. Plus, for want of using Dayton's favourite word "context", neither of you are privy to what Dayton has said to me over PM. If you were you might better understand why I have reacted the way I have. EDIT: oh, and stop pretending as if it was me who revealed these latest events.
Last time I did that you ignored it, so I can't say I have much faith in that. I have copied and pasted them into a PM.
This ruling doesn't offend me. Dayton last year gave permission to find information on his teaching that was available at that time. The April 2015 document did not exist whe Dayton gave permission to find his school docs. Thus no permission exists.
Of course the true issue is the personal info rule. It's a joke when you apply it to a person who holds himself out as a public figure. There's no anonymity with Dayton. This would be like Ted Cruz coming here and saying he's a democrat and is pro abortion. People would get warned for linking to his voting record and off board statements proving otherwise. Dayton is not a competent teacher. He's a fuck up several times over. Any statement to the contrary is a lie.
Yes, because Dayton revealing a load of his personal info and Chad posting off board links to other info makes me the stalker. Do you even think about your posts before you make them? Maybe you should just stick to ineffectual rep bombing instead.....
The fact you keep arguing in favor of the posting of this personal information which you should know better than to do. And then you keep repeating it.
Probably SSD. They pay more, and unless he has some wife and kids he won't get TANF. It is pretty much the way to go when they allow people who are nutbars to claim they cannot work despite being completely able bodied. The true welfare whores are actually on Social security as they give out cash with far less restrictions, and no oversight. Plus you can also put a little bit of SNAP on top of SS benefits. They have gotten better with limiting SNAP benefits for people receiving SSD income. Plus some states actually now require work for actual welfare which SSD only requires you to go get evaluated by a doctor and resubmit your reasons every so often. SSD cannot do a lot of drug tests because opiate pain killers and psych meds are a part of the doctor's prescription. They also make a lovely secondary income for many SSD recipients.
I argued in favour of it because, in my opinion, Dayton had given permission for it. I have never disclosed anything here that was outside of his permission, nor sought the same. I did not uncover the information in question, nor was I aware of it (because, surprise surprise, I had not gone looking for it), so You're failing at life as usual.