God, what a thing to be cheering for. Being a partisan zombie has brought you so fucking low. I feel sad for the remaining speck of human buried inside you that must be crying. I'm sorry, speck of human, I can't save you. It's beyond my powers.
Who cares? Why does that matter? Argument from popularity is another of those fallacies. Remember when you cried like a little high-chair baby that you don't debate well, and I gave you that fallacy chart, and you ignored it? Don't cry that you fail anymore, I tried to help, and you gave me the finger.
Or for the South to rise again. Or for Trump to slay the paedo demons. Or for the fucking Rapture. FF: "It's not JUST me that's a fucking moron, so it's OK!!!!".
That wasn't really the point I was trying to make. I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty sure he's up there in popularity with Alex Jones so it's a highly anticipated podcast and I have no doubt we'll all be hearing about it tomorrow.
Fuck's sake, do you even listen to the shit you say? I mean, this is JohnM and the Lake Whores level.
to be fair, it's more about him saying stuff that makes me giddy with schadenfreude. dude is a laughingstock to all but his devotees-and frankly, they get made a lot of fun of too. (as per JP in his open letter that I linked to) I'm pausing to consider how L Ron Hubbard-esque the whole schtick is...
I’m talking about the memes that portray trans people as predatory “groomers.” Those aren’t anti-trans?
Attempting to and advocating for trans to be deprived of opportunities to compete in sports in ‘anti-trans’.
60's FF- "Aw, gee whiz, I'm not anti-black, I just don't want my daughter to date them, or to live next to them, or for them to eat at my lunch counters, or to get their spit on my favorite fountain. Which....requires them to not be in public life ever, ever, ever. But that's not ANTI! It's just...um....y'know...uhhh...*runs away*".
Hah. Rogan and Peterson combined. Dicky's hemorrhoids must be extra bloody this week from all the brick shitting. @Diacanu
Not predatory groomers, parents that groom their kids to become trans. They indulge their flights of fancy or steer them in a certain direction rather than just let them be kids. I mean we're talking about moms that start painting their son's fingernail or let them grow their hair long and wear dresses when they're three. Do you really think a three year old can wrap their head around concepts like sex and gender?
We need the hat trick, Rogan, Peterson and Jones. Dicky's head would explode. See @Diacanu, I can make shit up too.
I know manly goth men that paint their fingernails. I also know a very manly man with painted toenails. I know many manly men with long hair. Some of them are Sikhs, some of them are aboriginal, some of them identify as Vikings, some of them are metalheads. The language skills deteriorate as the bigotry increases. If they can't wrap their head around it, why do you think any of the above harms them? Before WWII, pink was considered a male colour and blue was considered a female colour. Were all the little boys that grew up surrounded by pink harmed by that? Or are the boys growing up now surrounded by blue the ones being harmed and they just don't know it?