seriously in 470 years, there've been six queens that covered 202 of them 14 kings. doing the math, ya get about 2.5 times the workload out of a queen...
Bourdain = GOAT. https://twitter.com/jfrankensteiner/status/1568045754995859456?s=46&t=N598DkxFN7NZDwHe3je46A
RIP Robin Williams. No one will say it better. Canada is a really nice apartment on top of a meth house.
Shit. Try living in that house with trump for four years. Also, fucking cops. I hate them all. and people. I hate people. I hate computers. I hate everything about this period in human history. [/rant] ... for now.
I hear that the taxpayers pay everything for the royals. I am figuring royal means welfare, and that means the world's biggest welfare queen was a white supremacist and is dead. It is almost like the UK is Alabama.
They aren't entirely taxpayer-funded. The Sovereign Grant (which runs to ~40-50 million) comes out of the government purse. They also have private investments and hereditary assets. The Crown Estate is a huge property portfolio and supports them through revenue on that as well. The general view is that the taxpayer burden is offset by the cash they bring in through tourism, but the Queen was a HUGE part of that. I can't seen hordes of Americans or Japanese rocking up to watch Charles troop the colour, if he can even be arsed to do so.
Tons of people on welfare have income and money. Als, just like american white supremacists on welfare she lost her fucking karen mind when a woman with some brown blood married into the original welfare family.
Imagine being Canada and having to mint and print a whole bunch of new money because some other country’s queen died. Loser stuff. https://twitter.com/barry/status/1567863458892226562?s=46&t=N598DkxFN7NZDwHe3je46A
Yeah, no. Just like the U.S., coins are minted every year in Canada. So they'll just change the obverse to King Charles III. Not really a big deal. Most countries change their coin designs annually anyway. As for paper currency, we actually use polymer notes that are much more durable than the cotton paper you Yanks use. There is no legal reason to change the bills until they're worn out, so it may be a few years before we start seeing banknotes with King Chuck.
Plenty of generic royal touristy stuff that doesn’t require the monarch be present. Changing of the guard, taking selfies with the guards with the tall hats, Crown Jewels, etc. i think your royalty tourism won’t be affected much. Might even improve for a while with the novelty of a king.
Here in New Zealand, the media lunkheads thought they'd be clever and assure us that banknotes featuring the Queen were still legal tender. Golly gosh, and I was about to throw out all my money! Thanks, fuckfaces. I stand by what I've said for years: once she goes, tootle pip to Monarchy. If I were a UK citizen, I wouldn't want a red cent of my tax going towards the Royal coffers when its members are privately wealthy. Also, you're looking at a white male being cast in the role for the next 100 or so years (Charles --> William --> George). I always admired The Queen's efforts to remain constant over the decades. I say finish on a high and call it a wrap.
Actually, the US currency is made from a material that is so highly controlled only 2 places are able to make it. It’s easier to “wash” the ink off one dollar bills and make them into 100 dollar bills than to recreate the paper. Not sure exactly what the tech specs are, but, I think you’re incorrect about the resilience of US currency.
Oh cheer up, pal. There's always hope that George VI will piss off to run off with an American and Lottie will take his place
Someone's been watching Reacher on Amazon Prime. Polymer banknotes are generally more secure and last much longer than cotton banknotes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_banknote