Weren't you the one insisting that the Supreme Court absolutely wouldn't overturn Roe v. Wade? It's almost as if people get to choose what they care about without checking on what you think the race is "supposed to be about." How rude of the other voters to not consult with you.
Yup, there is still; 4 hours left, I am two strikes down, and you almost got me with that one too. Troll respect.
@Steal My Faceman was able to come in on a great twist of the nick switching Federal Fetus is known for. NotDayton was awesome and fooled many, but this was next level, and it was pitched right to a creative and fun member of the community to knock out of the park. This was the proper opportunity to not be just som,e shitty copy of ND, but rather the improvement on the OG gag. Let us not forget that ND was pretty much an old gag done new and relevant that amused us all and caught many of us on many occasion. The boy used face in his name and it is a moral imperative to have mocked him in this way. It is a fucking joy. If you are perhaps the ND owner you should applaud the new fun. Whoever that was was great and this takes nothing away from them, but it is a new person's turn. Being a true master troll means knowing when to bow to greatness you could not accomplish. There is no way the boy changes his name to anything resembling mine, and I don't know if I could bail on my character long enough to do this level of parody. Faceman is doing this with his own account, something that ND did not do.
Shut up you who posts a fucking Nazi avatar as his own. Why don't you go show @Steal My Faceman what for and sdo that shit again so he can't copy you. I am really pissed at you because it is your fault I have almost struk out and have to be super careful not to get fooled three times in a day. If you weren't such a racist little fucker there wouldn't be any question you meant spy and not black person with spook. I am sure you are dangerously close to another vacation with that dogwhistle, and if the mods cannot boot you I am certainly saying it is pretty fucking obvious you used spook to mean black person.
I’m so sad spooky season is over. Even though I don’t believe in spooks, I sure do love a good spook show.
No. I know you're using the term he used but it's bullshit. The whole "Moms for Liberty" book banning and etc shit is NOT about parental rights because if a parent WANTS support from the school for their trans kid, THAT isn't allowed. It's bigots' Rights - their right to impose their bigotry on parents who aren't as hateful as them. That said, if dumbass thinks they were voting on "parent's rights" then guess what - the GOP got their ass kicked on THAT issue too, everywhere that it was an issue the lost.
ever since adapting the policies of science and teaching children as much as they can during their formative years became a reality, and the iadvancement of technology to assist in learning the parental rights in education has become a mantra for parental abuse. What have the major "parent's rights" issues of our age been? They have been about not teaching children about sex and gender issues because learning something that is as natural as the reproductive system has been stigmified as evil by religion. Parent's rights are also about being able to beat the fuck out of your children, neglect them, or starve them of food and medicine because of superstition, lies, and ignorance that is mostly spread by religion. There is the parental right to lie to your kid about imaginary beings and folktales which have been scientifically debunked. This is again mostly due to religious teachings. There are the parental rights to give your children to adults for sexual purposes long before the legal age of consent, which again are due mostly to religious beliefs. where we once had to enforce parental rights to teach children something other than fantasy tales from books of lies and badly written age old stories, to now those people have switched up to use parental rights to physically and mentally abuse their children in hopes of stunting their growth and acceptance into modern society so they will remain with the religious cult they were unlucky enough to be born into. There shoyuld be no parental right to religious mental, emotional, and physical abuse, and as the state we have an obligation to step in and protect the abused from the organized abuses of children which is presently called organized religion. I am not saying we destroy organized religion, but it is time we restrict the dangerous application of their mind warping social and physical manipulations to a a proper age. We say that sex and violence are harmful is children are allowed to see them before they can be properly educated about their place in society, and we also restrict the use of gun and drugs asa they pose an obvious threats to the learning process of children. We do not let kids gamble because we know the dangers of self control and lack of it that adults face and understand children should not be subject to the temptation and destructive nature of that activity. It is high time we recognize religion is as mind warping and dangerous as any of those things and we should not be subjecting our children to the lies and manipulations of religious ideas before they have a proper grasp of the reality they have been born into. Once they have been presented with the reality that humans lie, and allegory and fictional storytelling are a way of entertaining ourselves and possibly can contribute to our perception of our place in the universe, we should not be telling them of these fucking fantasy beliefs.
But if you had the chance, would you hit it? Apparently, she's done actual porn. Unlike Bobo, however, she intended for other people to see her getting her freak on.
Please post the entire quote so someone knows what you’re talking about. Your post should be directed to Steal your Face, not me. My post was just that “parental rights” may be what was important to him, not everyone.
She might just be pointing out that by engaging in the intellectually dishonest argument over "parental rights" the boy made you give it some sort of credit that it is not due. Just using that perverted term in an argument makes it seem like the boy, or any republican trumpanzee twat, is making an argument for rights when they are clearly making an argument to take away rights. You are calling the fascists freedom fighters when you make absolutely no effort to point out the fact that they are arguing for the freedom to be fascist and not real freedom at all. This is why I keep on saying you are actually on the right when you come in like this and make the dumbest point possible while giving credit to the intellectually dishonest people on the right like @Uncle Albert and @Steal Your Face . You are always fluffing the fucking right, even when you are pretending to be on the left. At this point I am absolutely sure any liberal point you make is simply a troll meant to help the fail of the right because neither of these two trumpian morons can actually argue with any other liberal but you. Time and time again you have made the least effective argument against your twat boyfriend and his competition of neo dayton. You won't even parrot winning arguments from @Nova or anyone else around UA's ignore. Instead you throw up the points he wants the liberals to make because those are the points he is prepared to argue against. Again, you can get the fuck off the left side. We do not need purposeful losers like you trying to support the right by making fail arguments that make them feel like they are making points while not actually forcing winning arguments into their bubble. GTFO you slimy right wing Karen.
Could say the same about religion. No-one is saying teachers shouldn't mention God around kids. Funny that. This is entirely about excluding certain groups, and you fucking well know it.
Sorry man, but yeah, they are, and have been for decades over here. And IMO those people are correct. Leave your religion at home. God should never be taught, the history of religion can be, and that's pretty damning.
Are you seriously suggesting I secretly want a theocracy, or is this more of the bad faith bullshit you think makes you look clever? And don't come at me with "said the same thing on some subject. " You still have to refute with more than your usual boilerplate guilt by association nonsense to float that.
Here's a fun philosophical discussion; how far down your gullet does their dick have to be for the guilt to be legit? Cuz, you pretend you're only in the vague vicinity of the dick, while I contend it's smacking your uvula.
Back in reality, the premise is simple. Even if the same statement was uttered by the worst person imaginable, that does not negate the statement. That's just a lazy-minded end run around showing the work people like you are too fucking lazy to do. Kind of like calling someone a liar just because you don't LIKE what they have to say.
We've been over this. No one dogs on Hitler for being a vegetarian non-smoker. It's the Jew stuff. Your shit is spouted by bigots, and it's bigoted all by itself. Your bigoted sources are just a fun extra little bit of sundae sprinkles to point out.
