There is no anger here. Once more, you've made an assumption, and have filled in that blank yourself. That said, yes, this is a discussion board, but you're not discussing, you're insisting, even as the second person in the discussion has already said you don't have to do that.
Once more, you're free to believe what you wish, I've never said you couldn't. That being said, what you've said here is a non-answer. You remind me of those old evangelists who would say that atheists believed in God, but they were just afraid or angry with him, and that they knew the truth. Those evangelists were fools, because they couldn't conceive that anything outside of what they accepted as universal truth was considered yet one more delusion by others. If there is anything to be learned by this, and there always is, then I have learned that discussing things with you is ultimately futile. You offer nothing, and then double down on it.
We are not intellectual equals. The validity of your beliefs are not necessarily commensurate with mine. And that's the end of it. It's obvious that you are either too stubborn to learn or you simply lack the capacity to do so.
You can always tell who the smartest person is in the room by who is loudly proclaiming they're the smartest person in the room.
I agree and know (and learned) from experience. However, John has revealed his educational background and mine is substantially greater.
"Is." Clearly his use of proper grammar makes him your intellectual superior. Now, everyone watch what @Soma posts next.
You're a loser. You always will be. I see the mistake now that it's pointed out. I had no reason to perform a spell and grammar check. You see, for me, I'm not limited to knowing only one language.