Britain, Explain Yourself.

About that gay bar murder thing - somebody looks unfriendly, out of place and creepy the smart play might not be to get in the car with them. Damn that is beyond stupid.

This isn't the first case of Asians having a sex ring with vulnerable young girls. It's not even the second...

I've seen how many Asians view young white girls, and it's something many have been previously afraid to talk about for the cries of "racism" and the deflections using statistics (most child predators are white, however most attacks are from family members too, but these sex rings are a different beast from those kind of attacks and should be distinguished.)

The police certainly have a lot of pressure on them to be "culturally sensitive", which is a weasel phrase for ignoring things, but losing a rape victims clothing? And treating them with contempt? Arresting a victim for being drunk and disorderly? This was a systematic choice to ignore what was going on by the police and the council.

I really do get tired of the culturally sensitive bollocks, multiculturism brings in a lot of good, but if you're doing a Venn diagram of what that culture finds acceptable and what the UK finds acceptable, well the bits of that cultures view not overlapping needs to be left at the fucking border. We've enough backwards shit without importing any more.

Hopefully this will change a lot of things, and hopefully the UK Press will savage every last one of the bastards who allowed this to happen.

Yep - it seems the civilized, tolerant cultures are always played for suckers every time. It always ends up biting you in the ass.

Yeah, I gotta admit, that was a pretty pathetic attempt.

But it does go to show that some people believe there can never be too much political correctness...no matter who it hurts.

It's no shock that gul liked that post. He's showing himself more and more to be Liet light.

PC-ism at its core is about hiding the truth. First they advocate for changes in terminology (abortion becomes "reproductive freedom," gays shacking up becomes "marriage equality," global warming becomes climate change becomes climate disruption) and then they vilify, demonize and isolate anyone who doesn't follow their script. Dissension becomes "hate speech."

Liet doesn't seem to have much respect for our philosophy of innocent until PROVEN guilty. Because as we all know, anyone who's accused of wrongdoing must OBVIOUSLY be guilty and anything they say in their own defense is just a "feeble" sham. You know where we do unfortunately indulge this kind of backward liberal thinking? Sex assault allegations. We immediately label the accuser a "victim" (before ever establishing that a crime has been committed) and the accuser is shielded from scrutiny by a liberal media which has been convinced they must withhold the identities of accusers to avoid further "victimizing" them. Because, as we've been indoctrinated by liberal feminist propaganda, no woman ever fabricates rape allegations.

Sounds to me like Liet would be more comfortable living on Cardassia. Certainly explains his rush to judgement with Ferguson.

Decades ago some bright spark thought it was a good idea to bring over hundreds of thousands of impoverished, uneducated, non-English speaking people from a single, remote region of Pakistan with a radically different culture, who have given rise to a new generation of migrants that number in their millions. We are merely reaping what we had sown decades ago.

If I say "I didn't voice my concerns about Wordforge Policy X because I'm afraid Ancalagon will punch me in the face," that doesn't necessarily mean there's credible reason to think Ancalagon goes around punching people.