Bwahahahahahaha!!! Avanatti arrested for woman beating!!!

I'm on my cell phone at the moment, so can't link to the article, but this is just so fucking delicious.

Now watch all those who wanted to crucify Kavenaugh rush to lecture us about how we have to be patient and cautious and wait for all the info to come in and due process yadda yadda yadda.....

So, it seems he beat the shit out of his estranged wife, and is now whining that none of this is fair because "she hit me first!'



And just like that, Avenatti can kiss goodbye his chances at a prime-time talker on cable news, along with his 2020 aspirations.

Leading article on wapo.
Michael Avenatti, attorney for Stormy Daniels in two lawsuits against Trump, is arrested on suspicion of domestic violence
https://wapo.st/2TerEKj

The lawyer for the estranged wife is now denying that it was her that was the victim.


What if he slapped Stormy around?!?!?!?!

Indeed. What a horrible thing to do to another human being. When it comes to domestic abuse, I don't understand it. All I can think is that it involves domination, power, maybe jealousy? It's terrible, regardless.

Some on here claim it's no big deal, and dismiss it by claiming that they weren't responsible because they were angry and doesn't count if it doesn't cause physical injury.

Shrug. He's a slimeball. That surprises you? I thought you were in the same business.

Bullfuckingshit. You wanted Kavenaugh nailed to a cross the moment Ford came forward. But when it's one of your boys who likes to show the ladies who's boss, you're all "let's not rush to judgment."

Goddamn I love watching you clowns wallow in hypocrisy.

They would be wrong, and if Avenatti ends up being guilty, he should get help. No sane human being should think that beating the shit out of their partner is justifiable.

If he ends up being guilty, huh?

Suddenly we're a big believer in due process, are we?

https://wordforge.net/index.php?threads/kavanaugh-accuser-comes-forward.116471/page-66#post-3084822

Kindly fuck off now, you gobshite.

And so he dumb reps my response.

All you did was pay some superficial lip service to the idea of a fair trial. You exposed your bias when you proclaimed she was 100% telling the truth, and your belief that he should have been disqualified for the SCOTUS. Can't have it both ways John, you either believe in due process or you believe in destroying a man's career based on allegations alone.

For his next mind reading trick, he's going to give us the Super Lotto numbers!

Mind reading?

No John, the difference between you and me is that I never presumed Ford or the other women were telling the truth because I don't know them, don't know their histories or their motives, don't know if they're emotionally unbalanced and looking for attention, don't know if they were promised things by political operatives.

You, on the other hand, claim to know to a 100% certainty that Ford was being truthful, despite the fact that you don't know her, don't know anything about her other than what you read in the press, and weren't present to witness anything first hand.

So really, which one of us is being unreasonable here?

You clearly are. Your supposed positions are entirely based more or less on politics alone. Well the circus that politics have turned into. If the same accusation came from Trump, one of his lawyers or anyone the left didn’t like who’d be defending him and mocking liberals for imagined posts before all he facts came out. I could make a shitty bot and recreate your posts enough that no one would notice the difference. You’re a shitty troll and there’s nothing sadder than a shitty troll.

No, my positions are based on logic and common sense. I wasn't at the high school party 35 years ago, so I can't claim to know what happened. I also can't claim to know to a 100% certainty that Ford was telling the truth, because I wasn't there. So it becomes a question of credibility. John claims to know things to a 100% certainty, leading me to think he must have some kind of clairvoyant ability, or telepathic mutation like Charles Xavier.

See, I believe in the concept of due process. Innocent until proven guilty. I don't believe in Trial By Twitter. Guilt isn't established by Facebook poll.

Hilarious.

Kavanaugh is a rapist. No investigation needed. The women's word is good enough.

Dipshit lawyer in this story? Let's wait for an investigation.

You’re agreeing with an already disproven Flashy post.

This Wohl guy IMHO needs to eat a bullet. He's making things more difficult.

What's not proven about it?

Avenatti was arrested. It just turns out it's another woman who is the victim and not his ex.

It's nice to see you're no longer on the believe all women train. Funny how that works.

Seriously, you’re not looking very astute at the moment.

#ibelieveher

#notallstrawmen