Granted, she now has an incentive to pander to Republican regressives, but she is an expert on both sports and trans issues. https://www.yahoo.com/news/caitlyn-jenner-says-transgender-girls-210220865.html What say you, wokeforge?
There is, and always has been, lots of personal profit to be had in being the member of a marginalized minority group who's willing to tell the more conservative members of the majority what they want to hear.
How come all these assholes who pretend to care about fairness in sports don't go after Michal Phelps? He's an actual certified X-Men style mutant, and those mutations unquestionably helped him dominate his sport. Why aren't these anti-transgender assholes calling for him to be stripped of his medals and banned from competing because of his genetic advantages? Hint: Because it was never about fairness in sports.
Well, if all genetic advantages are relative to the individual, should we just stop segregating sports by gender entirely?
Caitlyn Jenner has learned nothing from the last four years, no matter what her statements on Trump. Also what Doc said. I'm so tired.
or maybe...just maybe....Jenner isn't "telling them what they want to hear" but is telling it like it is. But what would she know, she's only trans and a former "best of the best" athlete. Granted I'm assuming that the trans community isn't monolithic in their thinking. Any thoughts?
Right. We want to give priority to the voices who live the experience, but if they say the wrong thing, they must be acting nefariously in their own self-intest, as @tafkats suggested. Whatever ad hominem is most convenient in the moment. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's nice how lived experience starts to matter right at the moment when we locate the one person out of 1,000 who says what we want to hear. The other 999 are just ... insufficiently objective, I guess?
On that note, some actual polling data would be great. On the other hand, Jenner has been upheld as a trans hero for years. Her opinion carries weight.
She's going to peddle half-truths in order to curry favor with the conservative base, and she'll gladly be used as a token transgender person to deflect from the criticism that what she's doing hurts transgender people all over the US. She is a very wealthy woman whose life experience is not going to be remotely average of any transgender person. She won't represent us at all, and will do more harm than good. She would be a detriment to transgender rights.
Are there any transmen that lead in their sports field? I know this sounds like a loaded question but it’s not, I’ve tried searching but all I can find are examples of transmen talking about taking part in male divisions rather than how successful they are.
Could you not already do that (in theory) for non-team sports? ie compare results in athletics, swimming etc just by the competitors weight and height?
Give me points for hitting the rim and I could be a star basketball player. As long as you don't expect me to dribble my way down the court. So I guess not.
" she is an expert on both sports and trans issues." The fuck she is. If I get started further I might not stop for 500+ words.
In point of actual historical fact, some didn't. Just as many women supported Phyllis Sclafley and not a few gay/trans people are, inexplicably, Trumpsters.
No. The only ones who held her up as any kind of example were naive cis-media who were blinded by "rich, famous, and transitioning!" Trans people were saying from the very jump "fuck no!" Hell watch her show, even the women she had on with her were spending all their time saying "what the fuck is wrong with you?" She has literally never been ANY trans person's hero or role model, nor anyone any of us pointed to and said "there's a trans icon." And none of us will react to any damn stand she takes except to say "for the love of god would you shut the fuck up and go play golf."
We're not monolithic in our thinking on many issues of debate, but other than the ones who are so right wing that they supported Trump against their own self interests, we are in near unanimous agreement that she's a privileged, entitled, ill-informed, asshole. Which is to say, your typical Republican.
I think she's doing a bit NOW. My guess is that Parschle recruiter her as the face of his next grift, and convinced her that a lot of the right wing marks will throw money at them in order to "own the libs" and both of them will make serious bank until the day she gets 20% of the vote (at most)