Was found negligent but no charges will be filed. Once again, celebrity triumph's over law in California.
Didn't hear a peep from you when it was Hulk Hogan's son making his friend a vegetable in a car wreck.
Nick Hogan was arrested, charged, entered a no contest plea, was sentenced to eight months in jail , 500 hours of community service, five years probation, and license suspended for three years. You're trying to compare that to a celebrity who isnt even going to get charged ? Damn you're dumb. PS: This incident happened before I ever joined wordforge so you're also dumb on that account.
It wasn't, so fuck off. If his name was Tyrone, he'd have been filled with enough lead to count as a giant pencil, and it wouldn't have been on the news.
Which is, phrasing aside, exactly what I said was going to happen when certain among us were confidently boasting that multiple unsavory butt-rapes were imminent.
Also - lest we forget - this. Which would have been just as true if the third vehicle (Jennr's) had been owned and driven by Joe Bob Jenner, a local plumber in Malibu. No celebrity required. However, the celebrity angle takes "unlikely to be charged" over into "no fucking way"
I'm not going to do the work of providing a screenshot but I just want to point to the rating I got on that post - TR gives it "Fantasy World" except it...kinda has quotes backing up what I said. I'll let the contrast speak for itself.
The multiple imminent butt rapes comment is why I gave it that rating you moron. Yes, I provided a link to an article that said Jenner would be charged. Doesn't mean I was hoping for bad things to happen to your new hero in prison so go fuck yourself.
Didn't say WHO made such comments, just that they were made. I don't think anyone was hoping that necessarily, just assuming too much. This is a simple thing: some of us were confident Jenner would be charged and likely convicted and likely do time. The prison rape implications being simply colorful language. Other's among us were confident no charge or conviction would occur. These proved correct. I was the primary one in this group. It's hardly radical to crow when you're right.
Maybe just that you seem to be happy that someone got away with negligent homicide because of their celebrity status.
I don't believe that's what it was. For starters, the woman who died was the first to collide with another vehicle, and the circumstance that led a simple rear-ender to become a fatality were basically happenstance. Negligent manslaughter would have been the strongest possible charge and that a helluva reach, even for an uncelebrated individual. As for escaping ANY consequence - that remains to be seen, but observing a thing is inevitable isn't the same as supporting it. Anyone who tells me the governor of Mississippi will not be re-elected in November will be laughed to scorn by everyone including me - that does NOT mean I'm happy about it. I do think Jenner having faced any criminal charge that would have included jail time would have been wildly irrational and having successfully avoided that is an excellent outcome...but I'd feel the same way if it was Joe Bob Jenner the plumber from Malibu. Unjust is unjust. What I DO take satisfaction in is that those who had hoped to gloat about the "freak" having to go to jail now won't get to.
Uh, no, not really, because that would be exactly what it was. Due to one person's negligence by not driving for the conditions, another person died. How is it unjust to punish someone with some jail time for killing a person because of their shitty driving?
Because it was a happenstance of events. Jenner's error was, at worst, EXACTLY the same as that of the deceased - it was simply bad luck that the second error led to a death (an error, by the way, that would likely not have happened had the first error not happened).
Negligent drivers who didn't mean to kill people are charged all the time.That's why it's called involuntary manslaughter. Are you saying nothing should ever happen to these drivers?
It depends on the circumstances, of course. But I will say that if the two here were reversed - Jenner in the initial car and the victim in the one behind - no, I wouldn't think she should be charged with such a heavy penalty either.
